Chilling-induced water stress: Variation in shoot turgor maintenance among wild tomato species from diverse habitats

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1991-1999

  Easlon, Hsien Ming ^a   Asensio, José Salvador Rubio ^b   St Clair, Dina A ^a   Bloom, Arnold J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Plant Abiotic Stress Department cebascsic   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Chilling; Drought; Elevation; Root; Solanaceae; Solanum; Tomato

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CHROMOSOME; COLD TOLERANCE; DROUGHT STRESS; ELEVATION; FRUIT; INTROGRESSION; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); ROOT; SHOOT; SOIL TEMPERATURE; WATER STRESS; WILD POPULATION; WILTING;

ADAPTATION; ALTITUDE; ARTICLE; COLD; DEHYDRATION; DROUGHT; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTYPE; ELEVATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INBREEDING; INDUCED HYPOTHERMIA; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT ROOT; ROOT; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO;

ADAPTATION; CHILLING; DROUGHT; ELEVATION; ROOT; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; TOMATO;

ALTITUDE; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; COLD TEMPERATURE; DEHYDRATION; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTYPE; GENOTYPE; INBREEDING; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT SHOOTS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84885352326     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1200508     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AROCA, R., F. TOGNONI, J. J. IRIGOYEN, M. Sánchez-Díaz, and A. PARDOSSI. 2001. Different root low temperature response of two maize genotypes differing in chilling sensitivity. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 39: 1067-1073.
2. AROCA, R., P. VERNIERI, J. J. IRIGOYEN, M. Sánchez-Díaz, F. TOGNONI, and A. PARDOSSI. 2003. Involvement of abscisic acid in leaf and root of maize (Zea mays L.) in avoiding chilling-induced water stress. Plant Science 165: 671-679
3. BAGNALL, D., J. WOLFE, and R. W. KING. 1983. Chill-induced wilting and hydraulic recovery in mung bean plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 6: 457-464.
4. BARRS, H. W., and P. E. WEATHERLY. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water defi cits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15: 413-428.
5. BLOOM, A. J., M. A. ZWIENIECKI, J. B. PASSIOURA, L. B. RANDALL, N. M. HOLBROOK, and D. A. ST. CLAIR. 2004. Water relations under root chilling in a sensitive and tolerant tomato species. Plant, Cell & Environment 27: 971-979.
6. CANADY, M. A., V. MEGLIC, and R. T. CHETELAT. 2005. A library of Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines in cultivated tomato. Genome 48: 685-697.
7. CAPELL, B., and K. DOERFFLING. 1993. Genotype-specifi c differences in chilling tolerance of maize in relation to chilling-induced changes in water status and abscisic acid accumulation. Physiologia Plantarum 88: 638-646.
8. EASLON, H. M., and J. H. RICHARDS. 2009. Drought response in self-compatible species of tomato (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 96: 605-611.
9. EHLERINGER, J., O. B JÖRKMAN, and H. A. MOONEY. 1976. Leaf pubescence: Effects on absorptance and photosynthesis in a desert shrub. Science 192: 376-377
10. EPSTEIN, E., and A. J. BLOOM. 2005. Mineral nutrition of plants: Principles and perspectives, 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
11. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identifi cation and fi ne mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
12. FENNELL, A., and A. H. MARKHART. 1998. Rapid acclimation of root hydraulic conductivity to low temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 879-884.
13. GEISENBERG, C., and K. STEWART. 1986. Field crop management. In J. G. Atherton and J. Rudich [eds.], The tomato crop: A scientifi c basis for improvement, 511-557. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
14. GOODSTAL, F. J., G. R. KOHLER, L. B. RANDALL, A. J. BLOOM, and D. A. ST. CLAIR. 2005. A major QTL introgressed from wild Lycopersicon hirsutum confers chilling tolerance to cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111: 898-905.
15. HIJMANS, R. J., S. E. CAMERON, J. L. PARRA, P. G. JONES, and A. JARVIS. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965-1978.
16. KEBEDE, H., B. MARTIN, J. NIENHUIS, and G. KING. 1994. Leaf anatomy of 2 Lycopersicon species with contrasting gas-exchange properties. Crop Science 34: 108-113.
17. LABATE, J. A., S. GRANDILLO, T. FULTON, S. MUÑOS, A. L. CAICEDO, I. PERALTA, Y. JI, and R. T. CHETELAT. 2007. Tomato. In C. Kole [ed.], Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, vol. 5, Vegetables, 1-125. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
18. MARKHART, A. H., E. L. FISCUS, A. W. NAYLOR, and P. J. KRAMER. 1979. Effect of temperature on water and ion transport in soybean and broccoli systems. Plant Physiology 64: 83-87.
19. MARTIN, B., C. G. TAUER, and R. K. LIN. 1999. Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use effi ciency in tomato. Crop Science 39: 1775-1783.
20. MONFORTE, A. J., and S. D. TANKSLEY. 2000. Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: A tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 43: 803-813.
21. NAKAZATO, T., M. BOGONOVICH, and L. C. MOYLE. 2008. Environmental factors predict adaptive phenotypic differentiation within and between two wild Andean tomatoes. Evolution 62: 774-792.
22. NAKAZATO, T., D. L. WARREN, and L. C. MOYLE. 2010. Ecological and geographic modes of species divergence in wild tomatoes. American Journal of Botany 97: 680-693.
23. PATTERSON, B. D., R. PAULL, and R. SMILLIE. 1978. Chilling resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. & Bonpl., a wild tomato with a wide altitudinal distribution. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5: 609-617.
24. PÉREZ, D. J. J., J. J. IRIGOYEN, and M. Sánchez-Díaz. 1997. Chilling of drought-hardened and non-hardened plants of different chilling-sensitive maize lines changes in water relations and ABA contents. Plant Science 122: 71-79.
25. RAMOS, L. J., K. R. NARAYANAN, and R. T. MCMILLAN. 1992. Association of stomatal frequency and morphology in Lycopersicon species with resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria. Plant Pathology 41: 157-164.
26. RICK, C. M. 1973. Potential genetic resources in tomato species: Clues from observations in native habitats. In A. M. Srb [ed.], Genes enzymes and populations, 255-269. Plenum, New York, New York, USA.
27. RICK, C. M. 1976. Tomato Lycopersicon escultentum (Solanaceae). In N. W. Simmonds [ed.], Evolution of crop plants, 268-273. Longman, London, UK.
28. RICK, C. M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. In J. G. Hawkes, R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding [eds.], The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae, 667-678. Linnean Society Symposium Series No 7. Academic Press, London, UK.
29. RICK, C. M., M. HOLLE, and W. Thorp Robbin. 1978. Rates of cross-pollination in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: Impact of genetic variation in fl oral characters. Plant Systematics and Evolution 129: 31-44.
30. RICK, C. M., and J. I. YODER. 1988. Classical and molecular genetics of tomato: Highlights and perspectives. Annual Review of Genetics 22: 281-300.
31. SMITH, S. D., and I. E. PERALTA. 2002. Ecogeographic surveys as tools for analyzing potential reproductive isolating mechanisms: An example using Solanum juglandifolium Dunal, S. ochranthum Dunal, S. lycopersicoides Dunal, and S. sitiens I.M. Johnston. Taxon 51: 341-349.
32. SPOONER, D. M., I. E. PERALTA, and S. KNAPP. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes. [ Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.] Taxon 54: 43-61.
33. TORRECILLAS, A., C. GUILLAUME, J. J. ALARCÓN, and C. Ruiz-Sánchez. 1995. Water relations of two tomato species under water stress and recovery. Plant Science 105: 169-176.
34. TRUCO, M. J., L. B. RANDALL, A. J. BLOOM, and D. A. ST. CLAIR. 2000. Detection of QTLs associated with shoot wilting and root ammonium uptake under chilling temperatures in an interspecifi c backcross population from Lycopersicon esculentum × L. hirsutum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1082-1092.
35. TURNER, N. C. 1981. Techniques and experimental approaches for the measurement of plant water status. Plant and Soil 58: 339-366.
36. VALLEJOS, C. E., and R. W. PEARCY. 1987. Differential acclimation potential to low temperatures in two species of Lycopersicon: Photosynthesis and growth. Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 1303-1307.
37. VENEMA, J. H., L. VILLERIUS, and P. R. Van Hasselt. 2000. Effect of acclimation to suboptimal temperature on chilling-induced photodamage: Comparison between a domestic and a high-altitude wild Lycopersicon species. Plant Science 152: 153-163.
38. WILSON, J. M. 1976. Mechanism of chill-hardening and drought-hardening of Phaseolus vulgaris leaves. New Phytologist 76: 257-270.
39. YAKIR, D., J. R UDICH, B. A. B RAVDO, and S. M ALKIN. 1986. Prolonged chilling under moderate light: Effect on photosynthetic activity measured with the photoacoustic method. Plant, Cell & Environment 9: 581-588.
40. YOUNG, K. R., C. U. U LLOA, J. L. LUTEYN, and S. K NAPP. 2002. Plant evolution and endemism in Andean South America: An introduction. Botanical Review 68: 4-21.