Temperament and psychopathological syndromes specific susceptibility for rubber hand illusion

Psychiatry Research

Volumn 229, Issue 1-2, 2015, Pages 410-419

  Kállai, János ^a   Hegedüs, Gábor ^a   Feldmann, Ádám ^a   Rózsa, Sándor ^a   Darnai, Gergely ^b   Herold, Róbert ^a   Dorn, Krisztina ^c   Kincses, Péter ^a   Csathó, Árpád ^a   Szolcsányi, Tibor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^b EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Body schema; Interpersonal sensitivity; Multimodal integration; Peripersonal space; Schizotypy; Self integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL DISSOCIATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARANOIA; PERSONALITY TEST; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RUBBER HAND ILLUSION; SCHIZOTYPAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; SYMPTOM CHECKLIST 90 R; TEMPERAMENT; TEMPERAMENT AND CHARACTER INVENTORY; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CHARACTER; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HAND; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

RUBBER;

AVOIDANCE LEARNING; BODY IMAGE; CHARACTER; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; RUBBER; TEMPERAMENT; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939464355     PISSN: 01651781     EISSN: 18727123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.109     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Albrecht M.A., Martin-Iverson M.T., Price G., Lee J., Iyyalol R., Waters F. Dexamphetamine effects on separate constructs in the rubber hand illusion test. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011, 217(1):39-50.
2. Asai T., Mao Z., Sugimori E., Tanno Y. Rubber hand illusion, empathy, and schizotypal experiences in terms of self-other representations. Conscious. Cogn. 2011, 20(4):1744-1750.
3. Barnsley N., McAuley J.H., Mohan R., Dey A., Thomas P., Moseley G.L. The rubber hand illusion increases histamine reactivity in the real arm. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21(23):R945-R946.
4. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2004, 34(2):163-175.
5. Blanke O., Metzinger T. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13(1):7-13.
6. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands' feel'touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
7. Brozzoli C., Gentile G., Ehrsson H.H. That's near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(42):14573-14582.
8. Cascio C., Foss-Feig J., Burnette C., Heacock J., Cosby A. The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioception. Autism 2012, 16(4):406-419.
9. Chmielewski M., Bagdy R.M., Markon K., Ring A.J., Ryder A.G. Openness to experiences, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: resolving the controversy. J. Personal. Disord. 2014, 28(4):483-499.
10. Claridge G.E. Schizotypy: Implications for Illness and Health 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Cloninger C.R., Svrakic D.M. Integrative psychobiological approach to psychiatric assessment and treatment. Psychiatry: Interpers. Biol. Process. 1997, 60(2):120-141.
12. Cloninger C.R., Svrakic D.M., Przybeck T.R. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1993, 50(12):975-990.
13. Costantini M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion: sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Conscious. Cogn. 2007, 16(2):229-240.
14. De Fruyt F., Van De Wiele L., Van Heeringen C. Cloninger's psychobiological model of temperament and character and the five-factor model of personality. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2000, 29(3):441-452.
15. Derogatis L.R. Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Handbook of Psychiatric Measures 2000, 81-84. American Psychiatric Association.
16. De Vignemont F., Singer T. The empathic brain: how, when and why?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10(10):435-441.
17. De Vignemont F. Body schema and body image-Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):669-680.
18. Dinn W.M., Harris C.L., Aycicegi A., Greene P., Andover M.S. Positive and negative schizotypy in a student sample: neurocognitive and clinical correlates. Schizophr. Res. 2002, 56(1):171-185.
19. Eshkevari E., Rieger E., Longo M.R., Haggard P., Treasure J. Increased plasticity of the bodily self in eating disorders. Psychol. Med. 2011, 42:819-828.
20. Ferri F., Costantini M., Salone A., Di Iorio G., Martinotti G., Chiarelli A., Merla A., Di Giannantonio M., Gallese V. Upcoming tactile events and body ownership in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2014, 152(1):51-57.
21. Folegatti A., Farnè A., Salemme R., De Vignemont F. The Rubber Hand Illusion: Two'sa company, but three'sa crowd. Conscious. Cogn. 2012, 21(2):799-812.
22. Gallagher S., Cole J. Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. J. Mind Behav. 1995, 16:369-389.
23. Germine L., Benson T.L., Cohen F., Hooker C.I.L. Psychosis-proneness and the rubber hand illusion of body ownership. Psychiatry Research 2013, 207(1):45-52.
24. Graham K.T., Marin-Iverson M.T., Holmes N.P., Jablensky A., Waters F. Deficit in agency in schizophrenia, and additional deficits in body image, body scheme, and internal timing, in passivity symptoms. Front. Psychiatry 2014, 5(126):1-11.
25. Haans A., Kaiser F.G., Bouwhuis D.G., Ijsselsteijn W.A. Individual differences in the rubber-hand illusion: predicting self-reports of people's personal experiences. Acta Psychol. 2012, 141(2):169-177.
26. Hegedüs G., Darnai G., Szolcsányi T., Feldmann Á., Janszky J., Kállai J. The rubber hand illusion increases heat pain threshold. Eur. J. Pain 2014, 18(8):1173-1181.
27. Henry J.D., Bailey P.E., Rendell P.G. Empathy, social functioning and schizotypy. Psychiatry Res. 2008, 160(1):15-22.
28. Holi M.M., Sammallahti P.R., Aalberg V.A. A Finnish validation study of the SCL-90. Acta Psychiatrica Scand. 1998, 97(1):42-46.
29. Holmes N.P. Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 218(2):273-282.
30. Empathic Accuracy 1997, Guilford Press, New York. W.J. Ickes (Ed.).
31. IJsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A.W., Haans A. Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 2006, 15(4):455-464.
32. Kammers M.P., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C., Hogendoorn H., De Vignemont F., Schutter D.J. Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 21(7):1311-1320.
33. Lenzenweger M.F. Schizotypy and schizophrenia: The view from experimental psychopathology 2011, Guilford Press, New York.
34. Lewis E., Lloyd D.M. Embodied experience: a first-person investigation of the rubber hand illusion. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 2010, 9(3):317-339.
35. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008, 107(3):978-998.
36. Lopez C., Bieri C.P., Preuss N., Mast F.W. Tactile and vestibular mechanisms underlying ownership for body parts: a non-visual variant of the rubber hand illusion. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 511:120-124.
37. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behav. Brain Res. 2008, 191:1-10. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.041.
38. Mast F.W., Preuss N., Hartmann M., Grabherr L. Spatial cognition, body representation and affective processes: the role of vestibular information beyond ocular reflexes and control of posture. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2014, 8(44):1-14.
39. Meltzoff A.N., Decenty J. What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapproachment between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. The Neuroscience of Social Interaction 2003, 109-130. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford. C. Froth, D. Wolpert (Eds.).
40. Morgan H.L., Turner D.C., Corlett P.R., Absalom A.R., Adapa R., Arana F.S., Pigott J., Gardner J., Everitt J., Haggard P., Fletcher P.C. Exploring the impact of ketamine on the experience of illusory body ownership. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 69(1):35-41.
41. Moseley G.L., Gallace A., Spence C. Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical 'body matrix'. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2012, 36(1):34-46.
42. Mussap A.J., Salton N. A'rubber-hand' illusion reveals a relationship between perceptual body image and unhealthy body change. J. Health Psychol. 2006, 11:627-639.
43. Ocklenburg S., Peterburs J., Rüther N., Güntürkün O. The rubber hand illusion modulates pseudoneglect. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 523(2):158-161.
44. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
45. Paladino M.P., Mazzurega M., Pavani F., Schubert T.W. Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21(9):1202-1207.
46. Paillard J. Vectorial versus configural encoding of body space. A neural basis for a distinction between Body schema and Body image. Body Image and Body Schema: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Body 2005, 89-111. John Benjamins Publishing. H. De Preester, V. Knockaert (Eds.).
47. Paton B., Hohwy J., Enticott P.G. The rubber hand illusion reveals proprioceptive and sensorimotor difference in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2012, 42(9):1870-1883.
48. Peled A., Ritsner M., Hirschmann S., Geva A.B., Modai I. Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biol. Psychiatry 2000, 48(11):1105-1108.
49. Petkova V.I., Khoshnevis M., Ehrsson H.H. The perspective matters! Multisensory integration in ego-centric reference frames determines full-body ownership. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2(35):1-7.
50. Pineda J.A. Sensorimotor cortex as a critical component of an'extended' mirror neuron system: does it solve the development, correspondence, and control problems in mirroring?. Behav. Brain Funct. 2008, 4(47):1-16.
51. Preston C., Ehrsson H.H. Illusory changes in body size modulate body satisfaction in a way that is related to non-clinical eating disorder psychopathology. PLOS One 2014, 9(1):e85773.
52. Rognini G., Sengül A., Aspell J.E., Salomon R., Bleuler H., Blanke O. Visuo-tactile integration and body ownership during self-generated action. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 37(7):1120-1129.
53. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PLoS One 2011, 6(6):e21659.
54. Rózsa, S., Kállai, J., Osváth, A., Bánki, M. CS, 2005. Temperament and character: Cloningers' psychobiological model. (Temperamentum és karakter: Cloninger pszichobiológiai modellje.) Medicina Kiadó, Budapest. (in Hungarian).
55. Sass A.A., Parnas J. Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophr, Bull. 2003, 29(3):427-444.
56. Sforza A., Bufalari I., Haggard P., Aglioti S.M. My face in yours: Visuo-tactile facial stimulation influences sense of identity. Soc. Neurosci. 2010, 5(2):148-162.
57. Stallings M.C., Hewitt J.K., Cloninger C.R., Heath A.C., Eaves L.J. Genetic and environmental structure of the tridimensional personality questionnaire: three or four temperament dimensions?. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 70(1):127-140.
58. Tajadura-Jiménez A., Tsakiris A. Balancing the "inner"and the "outer" self: interoceptive sensitivity modulates self-other boundaries. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2014, 143(2):736-744.
59. Thakkar K.N., Nichols H.S., McIntosh L.G., Park S. Disturbances in body ownership in schizophrenia: evidence from the rubber hand illusion and case study of a spontaneous out-of-body experience. PLoS One 2011, 6(10):e27089.
60. Tsakiris M. My body int he brain: A neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):703-712.
61. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 2005, 31(1):80-91.
62. Unoka Zs, Rózsa S., Ko N., Kállai J., Fábián Á., Simon L. Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of Derogatis Symptom Checklist. A Derogatis-féle tünetlista hazai alkalmazásával szerzett tapsztalatok). Psychiatria Hungarica 2004, 19(3):28-35. in Hungarian.