Individual differences in the rubber-hand illusion: Predicting self-reports of people's personal experiences

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 169-177

  Haans, Antal ^a   Kaiser, Florian G ^b   Bouwhuis, Don G ^a   IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Body image disturbances; Illusions (perception); Individual differences; Measurement; Rubber hand illusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMAN; ILLUSION; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SELF REPORT; TOUCH; VISION;

ADULT; AGED; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SELF REPORT; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84865824972     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.07.016     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2003, 270:1499-1506.
2. Bond T.G., Fox C.M. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences 2007, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
3. Botvinick M. Probing the neural basis of body ownership. Science 2004, 305:782-783.
4. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
5. Burrack A., Brugger P. Individual differences in susceptibility to experimentally induced phantom sensations. Body Image 2005, 2:307-313.
6. Charles E.P. The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets. Psychological Methods 2005, 10:206-226.
7. de Vignemont F., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Body mereology. Human body perception from the inside out 2006, 147-170. Oxford University Press, New York. G. Knoblich, I.M. Thornton, M. Grosjean, M. Shiffrar (Eds.).
8. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 2004, 305:875-877.
9. Folegatti A., Farnè A., Salemme R., de Vignemont F. The rubber hand illusion: Two's a company, but three's a crowd. Consciousness and Cognition 2012, 21:799-812.
10. Gorsuch R.L. Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 1997, 68:532-560.
11. Haans, A., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (in preparation). Individual and situational determinants of rubber-hand illusion: Body image instability, mental motor ability, and fake hand orientation. Manuscript.
12. Haans A., IJsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A.W. The effect of similarities in skin texture and hand shape on perceived ownership of a fake limb. Body Image 2008, 5:389-394.
13. Holmes N.P., Snijders H.J., Spence C. Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership. Perception & Psychophysics 2006, 68:685-701.
14. Holmes N.P., Spence C. Dissociating body image and body schema with rubber hands. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:211-212.
15. IJsselsteijn W.A., de Kort Y.A.W., Haans A. Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2006, 15:455-464.
16. Juhel J., Neiger H. The illusory movement sensation paradigm: Some personality correlates. Personality and Individual Differences 1993, 14:293-296.
17. Kammers M.P.M., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C., Hogendoorn H., de Vignemont F., Schutter D.J.L.G. Is this hand for real? Attenuation of the rubber hand illusion by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the inferior parietal lobule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 21:1311-1320.
18. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 2007, 317:1096-1099.
19. Lewis E., Lloyd D.M. Embodied experience: A first-person investigation of the rubber hand illusion. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2010, 9:317-339.
20. Linacre J.M. Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best?. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1998, 2:266-283.
21. Linacre J.M. Construction of measures from many-facet data. Journal of Applied Measurement 2002, 3:486-512.
22. Linacre J.M. Data variance: Explained, modeled and empirical. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2003, 17:942-943.
23. Linacre J.M. Facets (version 3.67.1) 2010, (Computer software), Oregon, Beaverton, Winsteps.com.
24. Linacre J.M. Dichotomizing rating scales. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2009, 23:1228.
25. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P.M., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 2008, 107:978-998.
26. Longo M.R., Schüür F., Kammers M.P.M., Tsakiris M., Haggard P. Self awareness and the body image. Acta Psychologica 2009, 132:166-172.
27. MacLachlan M., Desmond D., Horgan O. Psychological correlates of illusory body experiences. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2003, 40:59-66.
28. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Ehrsson H.H. On the other hand: Dummy hands and peripersonal space. Behavioral Brain Research 2008, 191:1-10.
29. Mussap A.J., Salton N. A 'rubber-hand' illusion reveals a relationship between perceptual body image and unhealthy body change. Journal of Health Psychology 2006, 11:627-639.
30. Paladino M.P., Mazzurega M., Pavani F., Schubert T. Synchronous multisensory stimulation blurs self-other boundaries. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1202-1207.
31. Peled A., Ritsner M., Hirschmann S., Geva A.B., Modai I. Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients. Biological Psychiatry 2000, 48:1105-1108.
32. Rohde M., Di Luca M., Ernst M.O. The rubber hand illusion: Feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PloS One 2011, 6. (6 Serial No. e21659).
33. Schumacker R.E., Lunz M.E. Interpreting the chi-square statistics reported in the many-faceted Rasch model. Journal of Outcome Measurement 1997, 1:239-257.
34. Shimada S., Fukuda K., Hiraki K. Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PloS One 2009, 4. (7 Serial No. e6185).
35. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
36. van Strien J.W. Classificatie van links- en rechtshandige proefpersonen. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en Haar Grensgebieden 1992, 47:88-92.
37. Wright B.D., Linacre J.M. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994, 8:370.