IMPACCT Kids' Care: A real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 351-357

  Likumahuwa Ackman, Sonja ^a   Angier, Heather ^a   Sumic, Aleksandra ^b   Harding, Rose L ^a   Cottrell, Erika K ^a   Cohen, Deborah J ^a   Nelson, Christine A ^b   Burdick, Timothy E ^a,c,d   Wallace, Lorraine S ^e   Gallia, Charles ^f   Devoe, Jennifer E ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OCHIN Inc ^*  (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Oregon Clinic   (United States)

^e THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f OREGON HEALTH AUTHORITY   (United States)

Author keywords

community networks; comparative effectiveness research; consumer participation; patient engagement; patient centered outcomes research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; FAMILY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CENTER; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDY DESIGN; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; METHODOLOGY; OREGON; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TRENDS;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; OREGON; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84939443727     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.15.24     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(2), 181-194 (2012).
2. Lavallee DC, Williams CJ, Tambor ES, Deverka PA. Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success? J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(5), 397-407 (2012).
3. Mikesell L, Bromley E, Khodyakov D. Ethical communityengaged research: a literature review. Am. J. Public Health 103(12), e7-e14 (2013).
4. Tapp H, White L, Steuerwald M, Dulin M. Use of community-based participatory research in primary care to improve healthcare outcomes and disparities in care. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 2(4), 405-419 (2013).
5. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 19, 173-202 (1998).
6. Greenwood J. Action research: a few details, a caution and something new. J. Adv. Nurs. 20(1), 13-18 (1994).
7. Malterud K. Action research-a strategy for evaluation of medical interventions. Fam. Pract. 12(4), 476-481 (1995).
8. Hart E, Bond M. Making sense of action research through the use of a typology. J. Adv. Nurs. 23(1), 152-159 (1996).
9. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 297(4), 403-406 (2007).
10. Hartung DM, Guise JM, Fagnan LJ, Davis MM, Stange KC. Role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(1), 45-55 (2012).
11. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann. Fam. Med. 3(Suppl. 1), S12-S20 (2005).
12. Shah SG, Robinson I. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. Inc. Leadersh. Health Serv. 19(6-7), 500-515 (2006).
13. Coulter A. Evidence based patient information is important, so there needs to be a national strategy to ensure it. BMJ 317(7153), 225-226 (1998).
14. Kinzie MB, Cohn WF, Julian MF, Knaus WA. A usercentered model for web site design: needs assessment, user interface design, and rapid prototyping. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 9(4), 320-330 (2002).
15. Hoffman A, Montgomery R, Aubry W, Tunis SR. How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies. Health Aff. (Millwood) 29(10), 1834-1841 (2010).
16. Angier H, Wiggins N, Gregg J, Gold R, Devoe J. Increasing the relevance of research to underserved communities: lessons learned from a retreat to engage community health workers with researchers. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 24(2), 840-849 (2013).
17. Ahmad R, Kyratsis Y, Holmes A. When the user is not the chooser: learning from stakeholder involvement in technology adoption decisions in infection control. J. Hosp. Infect. 81, 163-168 (2012).
18. Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E et al. Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Rockville, MD, USA (2014).
19. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematicreview. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14, 89 (2014).
20. Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27, 985-991 (2012).
21. Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 312(15), 1513-1514 (2014).
22. (Ahrq) AHRQ. The Effective Health Care Program Stakeholder Guide www. ahrq. gov
23. Guise J-M, O'haire C, Mcpheeters M et al. A practice-based tool for engaging stakeholders in future research: a synthesis of current practices. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66, 666-674 (2013).
24. Devoe J, Angier H, Likumahuwa S et al. Use of qualitative methods and user-centered design to develop customized health information technology tools within federally qualified health centers to keep children insured. J. Ambul. Care Manage. 37(2), 148-154 (2014).
25. Devoe JE, Gold R, Cottrell E et al. The ADVANCE network: accelerating data value across a national community health center network. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(4), 591-595 (2014).
26. Devoe JE, Sears A. The OCHIN community information network: bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patientcentered medical village. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 26(3), 271-278 (2013).
27. Devoe JE, Gold R, Spofford M et al. Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-Based Research Network (SNW-PBRN). J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 24(5), 597-604 (2011).
28. Heintzman J, Likumahuwa S, Nelson C et al. "Not a kidney or a lung": challenges to conducting practice-based research in community health. Centers Fam. Med. 46(2), 105-111 (2014).
29. Arkind J, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Warren N et al. Early lessons learned from developing a patient engagement panel: challenges and opportunities. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. (In Press).
30. Devoe JE, Krois L, Edlund T, Smith J, Carlson NE. Uninsurance among children whose parents are losing medicaid coverage: results from a statewide survey of Oregon families. Health Serv. Res. 43(1 Pt 2), 401-418 (2008).
31. Devoe JE, Baez A, Angier H, Krois L, Edlund C, Carney PA. Insurance + access health care: typology of barriers to health care access for low-income families. Ann. Fam. Med. 5(6), 511-518 (2007).
32. Devoe JE, Marino M, Angier H et al. Effect of expanding medicaid for parents on children's health insurance coverage: lessons from the Oregon experiment. JAMA Pediatr. 169(1), e143145 (2015).
33. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Qualitative analysis: how to begin making sense. Fam. Pract. Res. J. 14(3), 289-297 (1994).
34. Torgerson DJ. Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ 322(7282), 355-357 (2001).
35. The Henry J. Kaiser Foundation: Summary of the Affordable Care Act. http://kff. org
36. Jaspers MW, Steen T, Van Den Bos C, Geenen M. The think aloud method: a guide to user interface design. Int. J. Med. Inform. 73(11-12), 781-795 (2004).
37. Morville P. User Experience Design. Semantic Studios http://semanticstudios. com
38. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute: Cycle I funding announcement: improving healthcare systems. www. pcori. org