Role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-55

  Hartung, Daniel M ^c   Guise, Jeanne Marie ^a   Fagnan, Lyle J ^a   Davis, Melinda M ^a   Stange, Kurt C ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

community networks; comparative effectiveness research; patient centered care; practice based research; translational research

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMMUNITY CARE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE BASED RESEARCH NETWORK; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH PRIORITY; REVIEW; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84886944664     PISSN: 20426305     EISSN: 20426313     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/cer.11.7     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Learning What Works Best: the Nation's Need for Evidence on Comparative Effectiveness in Healthcare. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, DC, USA (2007).
2. Wennberg J, Gittelsohn J. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science 182(117), 1102-1108 (1973).
3. Congressional Budget Office. Research on the Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Treatments. Congressional Budget Office, Washington, DC, USA (2007).
4. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA (2009).
5. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA (2009).
6. Green LA, Hickner J. A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 19(1), 1-10 (2006).
7. Lindbloom EJ, Ewigman BG, Hickner JM. Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research. Med. Care 42(Suppl. 4), III45-III49 (2004).
8. Fagnan LJ, Handley MA, Rollins N, Mold J. Voices from left of the dial: reflections of practice-based researchers. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 23(4), 442-451 (2010).
9. Green LA, Fryer GE Jr, Yawn BP, Lanier D, Dovey SM. The ecology of medical care revisited. N. Engl. J. Med. 344(26), 2021-2025 (2001).
10. Helfand M, Tunis S, Whitlock EP et al. A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research. Clin. Transl. Sci. 4(3), 188-198 (2011).
11. Sloane PD, Dolor RJ, Halladay J. Increasing the role of practice networks in medical research. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 22(4), 348-351 (2009).
12. Nutting PA, Beasley JW, Werner JJ. Practice-based research networks answer primary care questions. JAMA 281(8), 686-688 (1999).
13. Pace WD, Cifuentes M, Valuck RJ, Staton EW, Brandt EC, West DR. An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(5), 338-340 (2009).
14. Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Skinner JS. Geography and the debate over Medicare reform. Health Aff. (Millwood) Suppl. Web Exclusives, W96-W114 (2002).
15. Libby AM, Pace W, Bryan C et al. Comparative effectiveness research in DARTNet primary care practices: point of care data collection on hypoglycemia and over-the-counter and herbal use among patients diagnosed with diabetes. Med. Care 48(6), S39-S44 (2010).
16. Gill JM, Mainous AG 3rd, Koopman RJ et al. Impact of EHR-based clinical decision support on adherence to guidelines for patients on NSAIDs: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Fam. Med. 9(1), 22-30 (2011).
17. Atlas SJ, Grant RW, Lester WT et al. A cluster-randomized trial of a primary care informatics-based system for breast cancer screening. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 26(2), 154-161 (2011).
18. Tinetti ME, Studenski SA. Comparative effectiveness research and patients with multiple chronic conditions. N. Engl. J. Med. 364(26), 2478-2481 (2011).
19. Gold R, DeVoe J, Shah A, Chauvie S. Insurance continuity and receipt of diabetes preventive care in a network of federally qualified health centers. Med. Care 47(4), 431-439 (2009).
20. Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Preference- Sensitive Care. In: A Dartmouth Atlas Project Topic Brief. Dartmouth Center for Evaluative Clinical Services, Lebanon, NH, USA (2007).
21. Woolf SH, Chan EC, Harris R et al. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision-making. annals of internal medicine. Ann. Intern. Med. 143(4), 293-300 (2005).
22. O'Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Legare F et al. Toward the tipping point: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 26(3), 716-725 (2007).
23. Horn SD, Gassaway J. Practice based evidence: incorporating clinical heterogeneity and patient-reported outcomes for comparative effectiveness research. Med. Care 48(Suppl. 6), S17-S22 (2010).
24. Pace WD, Fagnan LJ, West DR. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) relationship: delivering on an opportunity, challenges, and future directions. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 24(5), 489-492 (2011).
25. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice based research: blue highways on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 297(4), 403-406 (2007).
26. Green LA, Hames CG Sr, Nutting PA. Potential of practice-based research networks: experiences from Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN). J. Fam. Pract. 38(4), 400-406 (1994).
27. Taylor RB. Family Medicine: Principles and Practice. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA (2003).
28. Tapp H, Dulin M. The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 235(3), 290-299 (2010).
29. Balas EA, Boren SA. Yearbook of medical informatics. In: Managing Clinical Knowledge for Health Care Improvement. Schattauer, Germany (2000).
30. Woolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA 299(2), 211-213 (2008).
31. Avorn J, Fischer M. 'Bench to behavior': translating comparative effectiveness research into improved clinical practice. Health Aff. 29(10), 1891-1900 (2010).
32. Dorsey ER, de Roulet J, Thompson JP et al. Funding of US biomedical research, 2003-2008. JAMA 303(2), 137-143 (2010).
33. Kerner JF. Knowledge translation versus knowledge integration: a 'funder's' perspective. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 26(1), 72-80 (2006).
34. Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann. Fam. Med. 3(Suppl. 1), S12-S20 (2005).
35. Mold JW, Cacy DS, Dalbir DK. Management of laboratory test results in family practice. An OKPRN study. Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. J. Fam. Pract. 49(8), 709-715 (2000).
36. Fagnan LJ, Davis M, Deyo RA, Werner JJ, Stange KC. Linking practice-based research networks and Clinical and Translational Science Awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad. Med. 85(3), 476-483 (2010).