Comparison of toxicity values across zebrafish early life stages and mammalian studies: Implications for chemical testing

Reproductive Toxicology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2015, Pages 3-10

  Ducharme, Nicole A ^a   Reif, David M ^c   Gustafsson, Jan Ake ^a,b   Bondesson, Maria ^a  

^a University of Houston   (United States)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human exposure; Meta analysis; Teratogen; Toxicity; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZO PARA DIOXIN; BENZO[A]PYRENE; CHLORPYRIFOS;

ACUTE TOXICITY; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEALTH HAZARD; LETHALITY; MAMMAL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; RAT; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; TERATOGENICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; ZEBRA FISH; ANIMAL; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; DRUG EFFECTS; EMBRYOLOGY; LARVA; LD50; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES;

DANIO RERIO; MAMMALIA; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS; RATTUS; RODENTIA; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; LARVA; LETHAL DOSE 50; MICE; RABBITS; RATS; TOXICITY TESTS; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84939415843     PISSN: 08906238     EISSN: 18731708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. National Research Council Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy 2007, The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
2. US EPA Framework for an EPA chemical safety for sustainability research program. Washington, DC 2011.
3. Skidmore J. Resistance to zinc sulphate of the zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio Hamilton-Buchanan) at different phases of its life history. Ann Appl Biol 1965, 56(1):47-53.
4. Howe K., et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature 2013, 496(7446):498-503.
5. Sipes N.S., Padilla S., Knudsen T.B. Zebrafish: as an integrative model for twenty-first century toxicity testing. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2011, 93(3):256-267.
6. Busquet F., et al. OECD validation study to assess intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility of the zebrafish embryo toxicity test for acute aquatic toxicity testing. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2014, 69(3):496-511.
7. Beker van Woudenberg A., et al. A category approach to predicting the developmental (neuro) toxicity of organotin compounds: the value of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryotoxicity test (ZET). Reprod Toxicol 2013, 41(0):35-44.
8. de Jong E., et al. Comparison of the mouse Embryonic Stem cell Test: the rat Whole Embryo Culture and the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test as alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing of six 1,2,4-triazoles. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2011, 253(2):103-111.
9. Ali S., van Mil H.G., Richardson M.K. Large-scale assessment of the zebrafish embryo as a possible predictive model in toxicity testing. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(6):e21076.
10. Parng C., et al. Zebrafish: a preclinical model for drug screening. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2002, 1(Pt 1):41-48.
11. Ducharme N.A., et al. Meta-analysis of toxicity and teratogenicity of 133 chemicals from zebrafish developmental toxicity studies. Reprod Toxicol 2013, 41:98-108.
12. Padilla S., et al. Zebrafish developmental screening of the ToxCast Phase I chemical library. Reprod Toxicol 2012, 33(2):174-187.
13. Wetmore B.A., et al. Integration of dosimetry: exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment. Toxicol Sci 2012, 125(1):157-174.
14. Zar J.H. Significance testing of the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. J Am Stat Assoc 1972, 67(339):578-580.
15. US EPA Health effects test guidelines: OPPTS 870.1300 acute inhalation, toxicity 1998, United States Environmental Protection Agency Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic, Substances, Washington DC.
16. US EPA Health effects test guidelines: OPPTS 870.1100 acute oral, toxicity 2002, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticides and Toxic, Substances, Washington DC.
17. US EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.1200 Acute Dermal Toxicity 1998, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pesticides and Toxic, Substances, Washington, DC.
18. Gilliom R.J., Barbash J.E., Crawford C.G., Hamilton P.A., Martin J.D., Nakagaki, et al. Pesticides in the nation's streams and ground water, 1992-2001: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1291 2006, 172. U.S.G. Survey.
19. Nebert D.W., Puga A., Vasiliou V. Role of the Ah receptor and the dioxin-inducible [Ah] gene battery in toxicity, cancer, and signal transduction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993, 685:624-640.
20. Takeuchi S., et al. In vitro screening for aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonistic activity in 200 pesticides using a highly sensitive reporter cell line: DR-EcoScreen cells, and in vivo mouse liver cytochrome P450-1A induction by propanil, diuron and linuron. Chemosphere 2008, 74(1):155-165.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Fourth report on human exposure to environmental chemicals 2009, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
22. Wetmore J.B., et al. Impact of race on cumulative exposure to antihypertensive medications in dialysis. Am J Hypertens 2013, 26(2):234-242.
23. Brannen K.C., et al. Development of a zebrafish embryo teratogenicity assay and quantitative prediction model. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 2010, 89(1):66-77.
24. Selderslaghs I.W., Blust R., Witters H.E. Feasibility study of the zebrafish assay as an alternative method to screen for developmental toxicity and embryotoxicity using a training set of 27 compounds. Reprod Toxicol 2012, 33(2):142-154.
25. Soldin O.P., Braverman L.E., Lamm S.H. Perchlorate clinical pharmacology and human health: a review. Ther Drug Monit 2001, 23(4):316-331.
26. Edginton A.N., Ritter L. Predicting plasma concentrations of bisphenol A in children younger than 2 years of age after typical feeding schedules, using a physiologically based toxicokinetic model. Environ Health Perspect 2009, 117(4):645-652.
27. Vandenberg L.N., et al. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol 2007, 24(2):139-177.
28. US EPA Prenatal developmental toxicity study 1998, USEPA, Washington DC.
29. US EPA Recommended use of body weight 3/4 as the default method in derivation of the oral reference, dose 2011, Office of the Science, Advisor. Risk Assessment Forum 2011, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.