Erratum to Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge (Psychon Bull Rev, 10.3758/s13423-014-0784-1);Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1068-1075

  Kemmerer, David ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concepts; Embodied cognition; Language comprehension; Semantics

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; MOTOR CORTEX; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

COMPREHENSION; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTOR CORTEX;

EID: 84938975418     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1031-8     Document Type: Erratum

References (94)

1. Andrews, M., Frank, S., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Reconciling embodied and distributional accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 359–370.
2. Aravena, P., Courson, M., Frak, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., & Nazir, T. (2014). Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 163.
3. Aravena, P., Delevoye-Turrell, Y., Deprez, V., Cheylus, A., Paulignan, Y., Frak, V., & Nazir, T. (2012). Grip force reveals the context sensitivity of language-induced motor activity during “action word” processing: Evidence from sentential negation. PLoS ONE, 7, e50287.
4. Arévalo, A., Baldo, J. V., & Dronkers, N. F. (2012). What do brain lesions tell us about theories of embodied semantics and the human mirror neuron system? Cortex, 48, 242–254.
5. Augustinova, M., & Ferrand, L. (2014). Automaticity of word reading: Evidence from the semantic Stroop paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 343–348.
6. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16, 1818–1823.
7. Bak, T. H., & Hodges, J. R. (2004). The effects of motor neurone disease on language: Further evidence. Brain and Language, 89, 354–361.
8. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. DeVega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment (pp. 245–283). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2008). Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13269–13273.
10. Besner, D., Stolz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221–225.
11. Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 527–536.
12. Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914.
13. Boulenger, V., Metouff, L., Thobois, S., Broussolle, E., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008a). Word processing in Parkinson’s disease is impaired for action verbs but not for concrete nouns. Neuropsychologia, 46, 743–756.
14. Boulenger, V., Silber, B. Y., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008b). Subliminal display of action words interferes with motor planning: A combined EEG and kinematic study. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102, 130–136.
15. Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12, 177–210.
16. Dalla Volta, R., Fabbri-Destro, M., & Gentilucci, M. (2014). Spatiotemporal dynamics during processing of abstract and concrete verbs: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 61, 163–174.
17. Da Silva, H. S., Machado, J., Cravo, A., Parente, M. A. M. P., & Carthery-Goulart, M. T. (2014). Action/verb processing: Debates in neuroimaging and the contribution of studies in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 8, 3–13.
18. De Grauwe, S., Willems, R. M., Rueschemeyer, S. A., Lemhöfer, K., & Schriefers, H. (2014). Embodied language in first- and second-language speakers: Neural correlates of processing motor verbs. Neuropsychologia, 56, 334–349.
19. Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J. P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70, 200–227.
20. Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2013). A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, 862–869.
21. De Zubicaray, G., Arciuli, J., & McMahon, K. (2013). Putting an “end” to the motor cortex representations of action words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1957–1974.
22. Dove, G. (2011). On the need for embodied and disembodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 242.
23. Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2006). Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. NeuroImage, 32, 570–582.
24. Fernandino, L., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., Blindauer, K., Hiner, B., Spangler, K., & Desai, R. H. (2013). Parkinson's disease disrupts both automatic and controlled processing of action verbs. Brain and Language, 127, 65–74.
25. Fernandino, L., & Iacoboni, M. (2010). Are cortical motor maps based on body parts or coordinated actions? Implications for embodied semantics. Brain and Language, 112, 44–53.
26. Filipovic, L. (2007). Talking about motion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. Gerfo, E. L., Oliveri, M., Torriero, S., Salerno, S., Koch, G., & Caltagirone, C. (2008). The influence of rTMS over prefrontal and motor areas in a morphological task: Grammatical vs. semantic effects. Neuropsychologia, 46, 764–770.
28. Goldfarb, L., Aisenberg, D., & Henik, A. (2011). Think the thought, walk the walk—Social priming reduces the Stroop effect. Cognition, 118, 193–200.
29. Graziano, M. S. A., & Aflalo, T. N. (2007). Mapping behavioral repertoire onto the cortex. Neuron, 56, 239–251.
30. Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114, 211–244.
31. Grossman, M., Anderson, C., Khan, A., Avants, B., Elman, L., & McCluskey, L. (2008). Impaired action knowledge in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology, 71, 1396–1401.
32. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
33. Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 21, 191–201.
34. Hillis, A. E., Heidler-Gray, J., Newhart, M., Chang, S., Ken, L., & Bak, T. H. (2006). Naming and comprehension in primary progressive aphasia: The influence of grammatical word class. Aphasiology, 20, 246–256.
35. Hoenig, K., Sim, E. J., Bochev, V., Herrnberger, B., & Kiefer, M. (2008). Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: Dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motor, and motion-related areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1799–1814.
36. Ibáñez, A., Cardona, J.F., Dos Santos, Y.V., Blenkmann, A., Aravena, P., Roca, M., … Bekinschtein, T. (2013). Motor-language coupling: Direct evidence from early Parkinson’s disease and intracranial recordings. Cortex, 49, 968-984.
37. Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Hessels, S. (2003). Item-specific control of automatic processes: Stroop process dissociations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 638–644.
38. Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37.
39. Kemmerer, D., & Gonzalez Castillo, J. (2010). The two-level theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system. Brain and Language, 112, 54–76.
40. Kemmerer, D., Gonzalez Castillo, J., Talavage, T., Patterson, S., & Wiley, C. (2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language, 107, 16–43.
41. Kemmerer, D., Miller, L., MacPherson, M. K., Huber, J., & Tranel, D. (2013). An investigation of semantic similarity judgments about action and non-action verbs in Parkinson's disease: Implications for the Embodied Cognition Framework. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 146.
42. Kemmerer, D., Rudrauf, D., Manzel, K., & Tranel, D. (2012). Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex, 48, 826–848.
43. Kiefer, M., Adams, S. C., & Zovko, M. (2012). Attentional sensitization of unconscious visual processing: Top-down influences on masked priming. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8, 50–61.
44. Klepp, A., Weissler, H., Niccolai, V., Terhalle, A., Geisler, H., Schnitzler, A., & Biermann-Ruben, K. (2014). Neuromagnetic hand and foot motor sources recruited during action verb processing. Brain and Language, 128, 41–52.
45. Kuipers, J. R., van Koningsbruggen, M., & Thierry, G. (2013). Semantic priming in the motor cortex: Evidence from combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and event-related potentials. Neuroreport, 24, 646–651.
46. Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2014). Neurocognitive insights on conceptual knowledge and its breakdown. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120392.
47. Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
48. Lebois, L.A.M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C.D., & Barsalou, L.W. (in press). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science.
49. Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50. Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (Eds.). (2006). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Lifshitz, M., Aubert-Bonn, N. A., Fischer, A., Kashem, I. F., & Raz, A. (2013). Using suggestion to modulate automatic processes: From Stroop to McGurk and beyond. Cortex, 49, 463–473.
52. Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273–302.
53. Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Cieslak, M., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2010). The role of personal experience in the neural processing of action-related language. Brain and Language, 112, 214–222.
54. Maieron, M., Fabbro, F., & Skrap, M. (2013). Seeking a bridge between language and motor cortices: A PPI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 249.
55. Majid, A., Boster, J. S., & Bowerman, M. (2008). The cross-linguistic categorization of everyday events: A study of cutting and breaking. Cognition, 109, 235–250.
56. Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Tsuda, N., & Majid, A. (2008). Talking about walking: Biomechanics and the language of locomotion. Psychological Science, 19, 232–240.
57. Malt, B. C., & Majid, A. (2013). How thought is mapped into words. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 583–597.
58. Mayka, M. A., Corcos, D. M., Leurgans, S. E., & Vaillancourt, D. E. (2006). Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 31, 1453–1474.
59. McGregor, W. B. (2002). Verb classification in Australian languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
60. Meyer, K., & Damasio, A. R. (2009). Convergence and divergence in a neural architecture for recognition and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 32, 376–382.
61. Mirabella, G., Iaconelli, S., Spadacenta, S., Federico, P., & Gallese, V. (2012). Processing of hand-related verbs specifically affects the planning and execution of arm reaching movements. PLoS ONE, 7, e35403.
62. Moody-Triantis, C., Humphreys, G. F., & Gennari, S. P. (2014). Hand specific representations in language comprehension. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 360.
63. Moseley, R. L., Pulvermüller, F., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Sensorimotor semantics on the spot: Brain activity dissociates between conceptual categories within 150 ms. Scientific Reports, 3, 1928.
64. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65. Papeo, L., & Caramazza, A. (2014). When “ultra-rapid” word-related motor activity is not faster than “early”: Commentary on Shtyrov, Butorina, Nikolaeva, and Stroganova (2014). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, XX, XXX.
66. Papeo, L., Rumiati, R. I., Cecchetto, C., & Tomasino, B. (2012). On-line changing of thinking about words: The effect of cognitive context on neural responses to verb reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 2348–2362.
67. Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PLoS ONE, 4, e4508.
68. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582.
69. Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 458–470.
70. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005a). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797.
71. Pulvermüller, F., Shtyrov, Y., & Ilmoniemi, R. (2005b). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 884–892.
72. Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor, premotor cortices by actions, action words, and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47, 388–396.
73. Reilly, J., Harnish, S., Garcia, A., Hung, J., Rodriguez, A. D., & Crosson, B. (2014). Lesion symptom mapping of manipulable object naming in nonfluent aphasia: Can a brain be both embodied and disembodied? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 287–312.
74. Repetto, C., Colombo, B., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2013). The effects of rTMS over the primary motor cortex: The link between action and language. Neuropsychologia, 51, 8–13.
75. Rueschemeyer, S. A., Ekman, M., van Ackeren, M., & Kilner, J. (2014). Observing, performing, and understanding actions: Revisiting the role of cortical motor areas in the processing of action words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1644–1653.
76. Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language, 105, 83–90.
77. Schuil, K.D.I., Smits, M., & Zwaan, R.A. (2013). Sentential context modulates the involvement of the motor cortex in action language processing: An fMRI study. Frontiers in human
78. Shtyrov, Y., Butorina, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Stroganova, T. (2014). Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, E1918-E1923.
79. Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1083–1092.
80. Simmons, W. K., Hamann, S. B., Harenski, C. N., Hu, X. P., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102, 106–119.
81. Slobin, D. I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
82. Slobin, D. I. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
83. Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
84. Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. (2013). At the mercy of strategies: The role of motor representations in language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 27.
85. Urgesi, C., Candidi, M., & Avenanti, A. (2014). Neuroanatomical substrates of action perception and understanding: An anatomic likelihood estimation meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping studies in brain injured patients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 344.
86. Van Dam, W. O., van Dijk, M., Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2012). Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2322–2333.
87. Van Dam, W. O., Brazil, I. A., Bekkering, H., & Rueschemeyer, S. A. (2014). Flexibility in embodied language processing: Context effects in lexical access. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 407–424.
88. Van Valin, R. D. (2006). Some universals of verb semantics. In R. Mairal & J. Gil (Eds.), Linguistic universals (pp. 155–178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89. Watson, C. E., Cardillo, E. R., Ianni, G. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2013). Action concepts in the brain: An activation-likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1191–1205.
90. Willems, R., & Casasanto, D. (2011). Flexibility in embodied language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 116.
91. Willems, R., & Francken, J. C. (2012). Embodied cognition: Taking the next step. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 582.
92. Willems, R., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010a). Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right- and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21, 67–74.
93. Willems, R., Toni, I., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010b). Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2387–2400.
94. Zwaan, R. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–234.