Attentional sensitization of unconscious visual processing: Top-down influences on masked priming

Advances in Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 50-61

  Kiefer, Markus ^a   Adams, Sarah C ^a   Zovko, Monika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attentional control; Automatic processes; Consciousness; Semantic priming; Subliminal perception; Unconscious visual processing; Visuo motor priming

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859093204     PISSN: 18951171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5709/acp-0102-4     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Ansorge, U., Fuchs, I., Khalid, S., & Kunde, W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychological Research, 75, 351-365.
2. Ansorge, U., Heumann, M., & Scharlau, I. (2002). Influences of vi-sibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 528-545.
3. Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-Trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 952-975.
4. Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Scharlau, I. (2011). Top-down contingent feature-specific orienting with and without aware ness of the visual input. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 108-119.
5. Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Worschech, F. (2010). Attentional capture by masked color singletons. Vision Research, 50, 2015-2027.
6. Ansorge, U., Kiefer, M., Khalid, S., Grassl, S., & König, P. (2010). Testing the theory of embodied cognition with subliminal words. Cognition, 116, 303-320.
7. Ansorge, U., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2009). Goal-driven attentional capture by invisible colours. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 648-653.
8. Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2005). Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 762-777.
9. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroence-phalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-355.
11. Bode, S., & Haynes, J. D. (2008). Decoding sequential stages of task preparation in the human brain. NeuroImage, 45, 606-613.
12. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
13. Boucart, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Lorenceau, J. (1995). Automatic access to object identity: Attention to global information, not to particular physical dimensions, is important. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 584-601.
14. Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. J. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 341-358.
15. Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1990). Semantic priming and re-petition priming from masked words: Evidence for a center-surround attentional mechanism in perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 341-350.
16. Chiappe, P. R., Smith, M. C., & Besner, D. (1996). Semantic priming in visual word recognition: Activation blocking and domains of processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 249-253.
17. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
18. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
19. Deacon, D., & Shelley-Tremblay, J. (2000). How automatically is meaning accessed: A review of the effects of attention on semantic processing. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, e82-94.
20. Dehaene, S., Changeux, J. P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 204-211.
21. Draine, S. C., & Greenwald, A. G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 286-303.
22. Duscherer, K., & Holender, D. (2002). No negative semantic priming from unconscious flanker words in sight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 839-853.
23. Eckstein, D., & Perrig, W. J. (2007). The influence of intention on masked priming: A study with semantic classification of words. Cognition, 104, 345-376.
24. Gaillard, R., Del Cul, A., Naccache, L., Vinckier, F., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2006). Nonconscious semantic processing of emotional words modulates conscious access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 7524-7529.
25. Goschke, T. (2002). Volition und kognitive Kontrolle [Volition and cognitive control]. In J. Müsseler & W. Prinz (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Allgemeinen Psychologie [Textbook of general psychology] (pp. 271-321). Heidelberg: Spektrum, Akademischer Verlag.
26. Hamker, F. H. (2005). The reentry hypothesis: The putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, ITfor attention and eye movement. Cerebral Cortex,15, 431-447.
27. Haynes, J. D., Sakai, K., Rees, G., Gilbert, S., Frith, C., & Passingham, R. E. (2007). Reading hidden intentions in the human brain. Current Biology, 17, 323-328.
28. Held, B., Ansorge, U., & Müller, H. (2010). Masked singleton effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2069-2086.
29. Henik, A., Friedrich, F. J., Tzelgov, J., & Tramer, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157-168.
30. Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284-291.
31. Hopfinger, J. B., Woldorff, M. G., Fletcher, E. M., & Mangun, G. R. (2001). Dissociating top-down attentional control from selective perception and action. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1277-1291.
32. Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., & Grange, J. A. (2009). The role of cue-Target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 466-476.
33. Jaśkowski, P., Skalska, B., & Verleger, R. (2003). How the self controls its "automatic pilot" when processing subliminal information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 911-920.
34. Kellenbach, M. L., & Michie, P. T. (1996). Modulation of event-related potentials by semantic priming: Effects of color-cued selective attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 155-173.
35. Kemp-Wheeler, S. M., & Hill, A. B. (1992). Semantic and emotional priming below objective detection threshold. Cognition & Emotion, 6, 113-128.
36. Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (1999). Effects of temporal cueing on residual visual discrimination in blindsight. Neuropsychologia, 37, 479-483.
37. Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (2004). Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight. Neuropsychologia, 42, 831-835.
38. Kiefer, M. (2002). The N400 is modulated by unconsciously perceived masked words: Further evidence for an automatic spreading activation account of N400 priming effects. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 27-39.
39. Kiefer, M. (2007). Top-down modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: A gating framework. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 289-306.
40. Kiefer, M., & Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: Evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 184-198.
41. Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (2010). Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: Task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 464-489.
42. Kiefer, M., Martens, U., Weisbrod, M., Hermle, L., & Spitzer, M. (2009). Increased unconscious semantic activation in schizophrenia patients with formal thought-disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 114, 79-83.
43. Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2011). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence, and future directions. Cortex. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21621764
44. Kiefer, M., Schuch, S., Schenck, W., & Fiedler, K. (2007). Mood states modulate activity in semantic brain areas during emotional word encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1516-1530.
45. Kiefer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2000). Time course of conscious and unconscious semantic brain activation. NeuroReport, 11, 2401-2407.
46. Kiefer, M., Weisbrod, M., Kern, I., Maier, S., & Spitzer, M. (1998). Right hemisphere activation during indirect semantic priming: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 64, 377-408.
47. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). Playing chess unconsciously. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 292-298.
48. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Priming from novel masked stimuli depends on target set size. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 37-45.
49. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and inference in task switching: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874.
50. Koch, C., & Tsuchiya, N. (2007). Attention and consciousness: Two distinct brain processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 16-22.
51. Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223-242.
52. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
53. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 9596-9601.
54. Logan, G. D. (1989). Automaticity and cognitive control. In U. J. S. & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 52-74). New York: Guilford Press.
55. Mari-Beffa, P., Valdes, B., Cullen, D. J., Catena, A., & Houghton, G. (2005). ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 293-305.
56. Martens, U., Ansorge, U., & Kiefer, M. (2011). Controlling the unconscious: Attentional task sets modulate subliminal semantic and visuo-motor processes differentially. Psychological Science, 22, 282-291.
57. Martens, U., & Kiefer, M. (2009). Specifying attentional top-down influences on subsequent unconscious semantic processing. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 5, 56-68.
58. Mattler, U. (2003). Priming of mental operations by masked stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 167-187.
59. Maxfield, L. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects. Consciousness & Cognition, 6, 204-218.
60. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
61. McCarthy, G., & Nobre, A. C. (1993). Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 210-219.
62. Merikle, P. M., Joordens, S., & Stolz, J. A. (1995). Measuring the relative magnitude of unconscious influences. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 422-439.
63. Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
64. Morris, J. S., Öhman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala. Nature, 393, 467-470.
65. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
66. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 106, 226-254.
67. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic progresses in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Neumann, O. (1990). Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception. Psychological Research, 52, 207-215.
69. Nobre, A. C., & McCarthy, G. (1995). Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming. The Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 1090-1098.
70. Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. (1998). Emotional conditioning to masked stimuli: Expectancies for aversive outcomes following nonrecognized fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 69-82.
71. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
72. Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of attention: From modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3990-3998.
73. Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 11458-11463.
74. Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160-174.
76. Raz, A., Kirsch, I., Pollard, J., & Nitkin-Kaner, Y. (2006). Suggestion reduces the Stroop effect. Psychological Science, 17, 91-95.
77. Raz, A., Moreno-Iniguez, M., Martin, L., & Zhu, H. (2007). Suggestion overrides the Stroop effect in highly hypnotizable individuals. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 331-338.
78. Reuss, H., Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hommel, B. (2011). Unconscious activation of task sets. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 556-567.
79. Reuss, H., Pohl, C., Kiesel, A., & Kunde, W. (2011). Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82-91.
80. Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703-714.
81. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
82. Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., & Henninghausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
83. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
84. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
85. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-88). North-Holland: Elsevier.
86. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
87. Tapia, E., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Shooner, C. R. (2010). Role of task-directed attention in nonconscious and conscious response priming by form and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 74-87.
88. Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2003). Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14, 391-412.
89. Trapp, S., Schroll, H., & Hamker, F. H. (2012). Open and closed loops: A computational approach to attention and consciousness. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(1), 1-8.
90. Treue, S., & Martínez-Trujillo, J. C. (1999). Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 399, 575-579.
91. Van Boxtel, J. J. A., Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2010). Consciousness and attention: On sufficiency and necessity. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 217.
92. Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA, 100, 6275-6280.
93. Wiese, H., Schweinberger, S. R., & Neumann, M. F. (2008). Perceiving age and gender in unfamiliar faces: Brain potential evidence for implicit and explicit person categorization. Psychophysiology, 45, 957-969.
94. Wolbers, T., Schoell, E. D., Verleger, R., Kraft, S., McNamara, A., Jaśkowski, P., & Büchel, C. (2006). Changes in connectivity profiles as a mechanism for strategic control over interfering subliminal information. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 857-864.