The effect of motoric fluency on metamemory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1014-1019

  Susser, Jonathan A ^a   Mulligan, Neil W ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

Judgments of learning; Memory; Metamemory; Motoric fluency; Recall

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEMORY; METACOGNITION; RECALL; WRITING;

FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; METACOGNITION; WRITING;

EID: 84938964295     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0768-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alban, M. W., & Kelley, C. M. (2013). Embodiment meets metamemory: Weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1628–1634. doi:10.1037/a0032420
2. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564
3. Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., & Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 610–632. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90016-8
4. Benjamin, A. S. (2003). Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory. Memory & Cognition, 31, 297–305. doi:10.3758/BF03194388
5. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55–68. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55
6. Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2013). Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 41, 897–903. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0307-8
7. Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2014). Perceptual fluency, auditory generation, and metamemory: Analyzing the perceptual fluency hypothesis in the auditory modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 429–440. doi:10.1037/a0034407
8. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
9. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123–1139. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1123
10. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
11. Gonzalez, R., & Nelson, T. O. (1996). Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 159–165. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.159
12. Hayes, A. E., Paul, M. A., Beuger, B., & Tipper, S. P. (2008). Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: The roles of action fluency and eye gaze. Psychological Research, 72, 461–472. doi:10.1007/s00426-007-0125-3
13. Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., & Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 22–34. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.22
14. Koriat, A., & Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 478–492. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.001
15. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 643–656. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643
16. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
17. MacLeod, C. M., & Kampe, K. E. (1996). Word frequency effects on recall, recognition, and word fragment completion tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 132–142. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.132
18. Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J., & Guttentag, R. (2001). Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs? Memory & Cognition, 29, 222–233. doi:10.3758/BF03194916
19. Mueller, M. L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2014). The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people’s beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.007
20. Mulligan, N. W., & Lozito, J. P. (2004). Self-generation and memory. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 175–214). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
21. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.1.109
22. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
23. Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 615–625. doi:10.1037/a0013684
24. Susser, J. A., Mulligan, N. W., & Besken, M. (2013). The effects of perceptual fluency and list composition on judgments of learning (JOLs). Memory & Cognition, 41, 1000–1011. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0323-8
25. Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2010). Metacognitive errors contribute to the difficulty in remembering proper names. Memory, 18, 522–532. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.481818
26. Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2012). The effectiveness of updating metacognitive knowledge in the elderly: Evidence from metamnemonic judgments of word frequency. Psychology and Aging, 27, 683–690. doi:10.1037/a0025838