Enjoyment of commute: A comparison of different transportation modes

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 537-549

  Páez, Antonio ^a   Whalen, Kate ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Active transportation; Actual commute time; Attitudes; Ideal commute time; Students; University campus

Indexed keywords

LAND USE; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENTS;

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATIONS; ACTUAL COMMUTE TIME; ATTITUDES; IDEAL COMMUTE TIME; UNIVERSITY CAMPUS;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

COMMUTING; MOBILITY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENT; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL TIME;

CANADA; HAMILTON [ONTARIO]; ONTARIO [CANADA];

EID: 77953539480     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Almeida P., Silva P. The peak of oil production - timings and market recognition. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1267-1276.
2. Al-Rukaibi F., Ali M.A., Aljassar A.H. Traffic safety attitudes and driving behavior of university students - case study in Kuwait. Transportation Research Record 2006, (1969):65-71.
3. American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2010. Response Rates: An Overview. (accessed 04.04.10). http://www.aapor.org/Response_Rates_An_Overview.htm.
4. Anable J., Gatersleben B. All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2005, 39(2-3):163-181.
5. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6. Cao X.Y., Mokhtarian P.L. How do individuals adapt their personal travel? A conceptual exploration of the consideration of travel-related strategies. Transport Policy 2005, 12(3):199-206.
7. Choo S., Collantes G.O., Mokhtarian P.L. Wanting to travel, more or less: exploring the determinants of the deficit and surfeit of personal travel. Transportation 2005, 32(2):135-164.
8. Cliff A.D., Ord J.K. Spatial Autocorrelation 1973, Pion, London.
9. Cliff A.D., Ord J.K. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications 1981, Pion, London.
10. Curtin R., Presser S., Singer E. The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment. Public Opinion Quarterly 2000, 64(4):413-428.
11. du Toit L., Cerin E., Leslie E., Owen N. Does walking in the neighbourhood enhance local sociability?. Urban Studies 2007, 44(9):1677-1695.
12. Dugundji E.R., Walker J.L. Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies - an empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects. Travel Demand 2005 2005, (1921):70-78.
13. Dugundji E., Páez A., Arentze T. Social networks, choices, mobility, and travel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2008, 35:956-960.
14. Fowler F.J. Survey Research Methods 1984, SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills.
15. Gatersleben B., Uzzell D. Affective appraisals of the daily commute - comparing perceptions of drivers, cyclists, walkers, and users of public transport. Environment and Behavior 2007, 39(3):416-431.
16. Getis A. Spatial weight matrices. Geographical Analysis 2009, 41(4):404-410.
17. Getis A., Griffith D.A. Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geographical Analysis 2002, 34(2):130-140.
18. Goetzke F. Network effects in public transit use: evidence from a spatially autoregressive mode choice model. Urban Studies 2008, 45(2):407-417.
19. Grannis R. From the Ground Up: Translating Geography into Community through Neighbor Networks 2009, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
20. Greene W.H. Econometric Analysis 2002, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. fifth ed.
21. Griffith D.A. Advanced Spatial Statistics: Special Topics in the Exploration of Quantitative Spatial Data Series 1988, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
22. Griffith D.A. A linear regression solution to the spatial autocorrelation problem. Journal of Geographical Systems 2000, 2(2):141-156.
23. Griffith D.A. Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering: Gaining Understanding through Theory and Scientific Visualization 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
24. Handy S., Weston L., Mokhtarian P.L. Driving by choice or necessity?. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2005, 39(2-3):183-203.
25. Haskell W.L., Lee I.M., Pate R.R., Powell K.E., Blair S.N., Franklin B.A., Macera C.A., Heath G.W., Thompson P.D., Bauman A. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2007, 39(8):1423-1434.
26. Johansson M.V., Heldt T., Johansson P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2006, 40(6):507-525.
27. Kamruzzaman, M., Hine, J., Gunay, B., Blair, N., in press. Using GIS to visualise and evaluate student travel behaviour. Journal of Transport Geography. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.004.
28. Larson J. Surviving commuting. American Demographics 1998, 20(7).
29. Larson P.D., Poist R.F. Improving response rates to mail surveys: a research note. Transportation Journal 2004, 43(4):67-74.
30. Lownes, N.E., Yannes, C.D., Garrick, N., Johnston, R., 2010. Operationalizing Place Making in a Choice Experiment Context. Paper Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
31. Lucas J., Heady R. Flextime commuter and their driver stress, feelings of time urgency, and commute satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology 2002, 16:565-571.
32. Martin E. Survey questionnaire construction. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement 2005, 723-732. Elsevier, Oxford. K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.).
33. Mokhtarian P.L., Salomon I. How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2001, 35(8):695-719.
34. Mokhtarian P.L., Salomon I., Redmond L.S. Understanding the demand for travel: it's not purely 'derived'. Innovation 2001, 14(4).
35. Ory D.T., Mokhtarian P.L. When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2005, 39(2-3):97-123.
36. Ory D.T., Mokhtarian P.L. Modeling the structural relationships among short-distance travel amounts, perceptions, affections, and desires. Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice 2009, 43(1):26-43.
37. Ory D.T., Mokhtarian P.L., Redmond L.S., Salomon I., Collantes G.O., Choo S. When is commuting desirable to the individual?. Growth and Change 2004, 35(3):334-359.
38. Paez A., Scott D.M. Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environment and Planning A 2007, 39(3):647-665.
39. Redmond L.S., Mokhtarian P.L. The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation 2001, 28(2):179-205.
40. Rodriguez D.A., Joo J. The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transportation Research Part D - Transport and Environment 2004, 9(2):151-173.
41. Salomon I., Mokhtarian P.L. Coping with congestion: understanding the gap between policy assumptions and behavior. Transportation Research Part D - Transport and Environment 1997, 2(2):107-123.
42. Sanches, S.D., de Arruda, F.S., 2002. Incorporating nonmotorized modes in a mode choice model. Highway Safety: Work Zones, Law Enforcement, Motorcycles, Trucks, Older Drivers, and Pedestrians (1818) 89-93.
43. Shannon T., Giles-Corti B., Pikora T., Bulsara M., Shilton T., Bull F. Active commuting in a university setting: assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change. Transport Policy 2006, 13(3):240-253.
44. Steg L. Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A - Policy and Practice 2005, 39(2-3):147-162.
45. Tolley R. Green campuses: cutting the environmental cost of commuting. Journal of Transport Geography 1996, 4(3):213-217.
46. Turcotte, M., 2005. Like Commuting? Worker's Perceptions of their Daily Commute, Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 11-008.
47. Visser P.S., Krosnick J.A., Marquette J., Curtin M. Mail surveys for election forecasting? An evaluation of the Columbus Dispatch poll. Public Opinion Quarterly 1996, 60(2):181-227.