Different Games for Different Motives: Comment on Haesevoets, Folmer, and Van Hiel (2015)

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 506-508

  Thielmann, Isabel ^a,b   Böhm, Robert ^c   Hilbig, Benjamin E ^a  

^a University of Koblenz Landau   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938584073     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.2007     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Betsch, C., Böhm, R., & Korn, L. (2013). Inviting free-riders or appealing to prosocial behavior? Game-theoretical reflections on communicating herd immunity in vaccine advocacy. Health Psychology, 32(9), 978-985. doi:10.1037/a0031590
2. Binmore, K. (2010). Social norms or social preferences? Mind & Society, 9(2), 139-157. doi:10.1007/s11299-010-0073-2
3. Bruins, J. J., Liebrand, W. B. G., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1989). About the saliency of fear and greed in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), 155-161. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420190207
4. Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 817-869.
5. Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
6. Dhont, K., Van Hiel, A., & De Cremer, D. (2012). Externalities awareness in anticommons dilemmas decreases defective behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(3), 228-238. doi:10.1002/bdm.718
7. Engelmann, D., & Strobel, M. (2004). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 857-869. doi:10.2307/3592796
8. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism-experimental evidence and new theories. In S.-C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol 1.) Foundations. (pp. 615-691). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/S1574-0714(06)01008-6
9. Haesevoets, T., Folmer, C. R., & Van Hiel, A. (2015). Cooperation in mixed-motive games: The role of individual differences in selfish and social orientation. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 445-458.
10. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY US: Wiley.
11. Kollock, P. (1998). Social dilemmas: The anatomy of cooperation. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 183-214. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.183
12. Osborne, M. J., & Rubinstein, A. (1994). A course in game theory. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
13. Simpson, B. (2006). Social identity and cooperation in social dilemmas. Rationality and Society, 18(4), 443-470. doi:10.1177/1043463106066381
14. Van Lange, P. A. M., De Cremer, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond: basic principles of social interaction. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). (pp. 540-561). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
15. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ, US: Princeton University Press.
16. Wilke, H. A. M. (1991). Greed, efficiency and fairness in resource management situations. European Review of Social Psychology, 2(1), 165-187. doi:10.1080/14792779143000051
17. Yamagishi, T., Mifune, N., Li, Y., Shinada, M., Hashimoto, H., Horita, Y., Simunovic, D. (2013). Is behavioral pro-sociality game-specific? Pro-social preference and expectations of pro-sociality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(2), 260-271. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.002
18. Zhao, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2015). The role of interpersonal traits in social decision making: Exploring sources of behavioral heterogeneity in economic games. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 19(3), 277-302. doi:10.1177/1088868314553709