Planning postdisaster operations in a highway network network design model with interdependencies

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2459, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-10

  Kepaptsoglou, Konstantinos L ^a   Konstantinidou, Maria A ^a   Karlaftis, Matthew G ^a   Stathopoulos, Antony ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HIGHWAY PLANNING;

DAILY ACTIVITY; DESIGN MODELS; EMERGENCY LOGISTICS; HIGHWAY NETWORKS; NETWORK DESIGN; NETWORK SUPPORT; POST DISASTERS; RAPID RECOVERY; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; WELL BEING;

DISASTERS;

EID: 84938578645     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2459-01     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Peeta, S., S. Salman, D. Gunnec, and K. Viswanath. Pre-Disaster Investment Decisions for Strengthening a Highway Network. Computers and Operations Research. Vol. 37. No. 10,2010, pp. 1708-1719.
2. Du, L., and S. Peela. A Bilevel Stochastic Optimization Model to Enhance Transportation Network Survivability and Reduce Response Times Under Disasters. Presented at 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2012.
3. Karlaftis, M.G., K.L. Kepaptsoglou, and S. Lambropoulos. Fund Allocation for Transportation Network Recovery Following Natural Disasters. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 133. No. 1,2007, pp. 1-7.
4. Iida, Y., F. Kurauchi, and H. Shimada. Traffic Management System Against Major Earthquakes. IATSS Research. Vol. 24. No. 2. 2000. pp. 1-9.
5. Ben-Ayed, O., D. E. Boyce, and C. E. Blair. A General Bi-level Linear Programming Formulation of the Network Design Problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 22. No. 4. 1988. pp. 311-318.
6. Waller, S., and A. K. Ziliaskopoulos. Stochastic Dynamic Network Design Problem. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1771. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001. pp. 106-113.
7. Yin, Y, and H. Ieda. Optimal Improvement Scheme for Network Reliability. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1783. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002. pp. 1-6.
8. Dimitriou, L., T. Tsekeris, and A. Stathopoulos. Evolutionary Combinatorial Programming for Discrete Road Network Design with Reliability Requirements. In Applications of Evolutionary Computing: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 444. (M. Giacobini, A. Brabazon, S. Cagoni, G.A. Di Caro, R. Drechsler, M. Farooq, A. Fink, E. Lutton, P. Machado, S. Minner, M. O'Neill, J. Romero, F. Rothlauf, G. Squillero, H. Takagi, A. S. Uyar, and S. Yang, eds.). Springer, Berlin, 2007. pp. 678-687.
9. Altay, N., and W.G. Green III. OR/MS Research in Disaster Operations Management. European Journal of Operational Reseanh, Vol. 175. No. 1. 2006. pp. 475-193.
10. Hopkins, D.C., J.L. Lumdsen, and J.A. Norton. Wellington's Lifeline in Earthquakes Project: An Outline of a Major Review. Lifeline Earthquake Engineering: Proceedings of the 3rd U.S. Conference (M.A. Cassaro, ed.). American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 1991. pp. 774-804.
11. Church, R., and M. P. Scapara. Analysis of Facility Systems' Reliability When Subject to Attack or a Natural Disaster. In Critical Infrastructure Reliability and Vulnerability (A.T. Murray and T.H. Grubesic, eds.). Springer, Berlin, 2007.
12. Chang, S.E., and N. Nojima. Measuring Post-Disaster Transportation System Performance: The 199. Kobe Earthquake in Comparative Perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Vol. 35. No. 6. 2001. pp. 475-494.
13. Murray-Tuite, P.M., and U.S. Mahmassani. Methodology for Determining Vulnerable Links in a Transportation Network. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 1882. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. pp. 88-96.
14. Sohn, J. Evaluating the Significance of Highway Network Links Under the Rood Damage: An Accessibility Approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 40. No. 6,2006, pp. 491-506.
15. Jenelius, E., T. Petersen, and L.-G. Mattsson. Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Vol. 40. No. 7. 2006. pp. 537-560.
16. Ukkusuri, S. V, and W. F. Yushimito. A Methodology to Assess the Criti-cality of Highway Transportation Networks. Journal of Transportation Security, Vol. 2. No. 1-2,2009, pp. 29-46.
17. Poorzahedy, H. and S. Bushehri. Network Performance Improvement Under Stochastic Events with Long-Term Effects. Transportation, Vol. 32. No. 1,2005, pp. 65-85.
18. Hadas, Y., and A. Laor. Network Design Model with Evacuation Constraints. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 47. No. 1,2013, pp. 1-9.
19. El-Adaway, I., and O. El-Anwar. Developing Optimal Hazard Investment Strategies. Proc, Construction Research Congress: Innovation for Reshaping Construction Practice (J. Ruwanpura, Y. Mohamed, and S. Lee, eds.), Banff, Alberta, Canada, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va., 2010. pp. 420-429.
20. Heaney, J. P., J. Peterka, and L.T. Wright. Research Needs for Engineering Aspects of Natural Disasters. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. Vol. 6. No. 1,2002, pp. 4-14.
21. Wang, Z., W. Lum, T. Shantz, and C. Roblee. Earthquake Planning, Response and Recovery Research Needs: CALTRANS's Perspectives. Public Works Management and Policy, Vol. 7. No. 1. 2002. pp. 46-51.
22. Kalafatas, G., and S. Peeta. Planning for Evacuation: Insights from an Efficient Network Design Model. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 15. No. 1,2009, pp. 21-30.
23. Yazici, A., and K. Ozbay. Evacuation Network Modeling via Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Probabilistic Demand and Capacity Constraints. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2196. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. pp. 11-20.
24. Xie, C, D.-Y. Lin, and T. S. Waller. A Dynamic Evacuation Network Optimization Problem with Lane Reversal and Crossing Elimination Strategies. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46. No. 3,2010, pp. 295-316.
25. Ng, M., and T. S. Waller. Reliable Evacuation Planning via Demand Inflation and Supply Deflation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46. No. 6,2010, pp. 1086-1094.
26. Xie, C., and M.A. Turnquist. Lane-Based Evacuation Network Optimization: An Integrated Lagrangian Relaxation and Tabu Search Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19. No. 1. 2011. pp. 40-63.
27. Chen, Y.-W., and G.-H. Tzeng. A Fuzzy Multi-Objective Model for Reconstructing Post-Earthquake Road-Network by Genetic Algorithm. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 1. No. 2. 1999. pp. 45-55.
28. Tzeng, G.-H., Y.-W. Chen, and C.-Y. Lin. Fuzzy Multi-Objective Reconstruction Plan for Post-Earthquake Road Network by Genetic Algorithm. In Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Volume 48. (Y.Y. Haimes and R.E. Steuer, eds.), Springer, Berlin, 2000. pp. 510-528.
29. Bana e Costa, C.A., C. S. Oliveira, and V. Vieira. Prioritization of Bridges and Tunnels in Earthquake Risk Mitigation Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Application to Lisbon. Omega, Vol. 36. No. 3,2008, pp. 442-450.
30. Karlaftis, M.G., K. Kepaptsoglou, and S. Lambropoulos. Fund Allocation for Transportation Network Recovery Following Natural Disasters. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 133. No. 1,2007, pp. 1-8.
31. Orabi, W. A.B. Senouci, K. El-Rayes, and H. A!-Derham. Optimizing Resource Utilization During the Recovery of Civil Infrastructure Systems. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 26. No. 4. 2010. pp. 237-246.
32. Orabi, W., K. El-Rayes, A. Senouci, and H. Al-Derham. Optimizing Post-Disaster Reconstruction Planning for Damaged Transportation Networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135. No. 10. 2009. pp. 1039-1048.
33. Feng, C. M., and C. C. Wen. Traffic Control Management for Earthquake-Raided Area. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5. 2003. pp. 3261-3275.
34. Feng, C. M., and C. C. Wen. A Bi-level Programming Model for Allocating Private and Emergency Vehicle Flows in Seismic Disaster Areas. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5. 2005. pp. 1408-1423.
35. Feng, C.M., and C.C. Wen. A Fuzzy Bi-level and Multi-Objective Model to Control Traffic Flow into the Disaster Area Post Earthquake. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 6. 2005. pp. 4253-4268.
36. Sumalee, A., and F. Kurauchi. Network Capacity Reliability Analysis Considering Traffic Regulation After a Major Disaster. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 6. No. 3-4, 2006. pp. 205-219.
37. Long, D., G. Shi, and Y. Wang. One-Way Traffic Organization Based on Traffic Load and Road Equity. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 10. No. 6. 2010. pp. 109-114.
38. Chase, A., and E. Avineri. Maximizing Motorway Capacity Through Hard Shoulder Running: UK Perspective. The Open Transportation Journal, Vol. 2. No. 1. 2008. pp. 7-18.
39. Cohen, S. Using the Hard Shoulder and Narrowing Lanes to Reduce Traffic Congestion: Some Lessons from an Experience on the Paris Motorway Network. Proc, 12th IEE International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control (RTIC 2004). London, 2004. pp. 149-153.
40. Veld, R. and H. Taale. Evaluation of Hard Shoulder Running and Other Extra Lanes. EEG/11/7. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
41. Riegelhuth, G., and A. Pilz. Temporary Hard Shoulder Use in Hessen- Experiences and Strategic Planning. Presented at i2TERN Conference 2007. Aalborg, Denmark, 2007.
42. Xie, C, M. A. Turnquist, and S. T Waller. A Hybrid Lagrangian Relaxation and Tabu Search Method for Interdependent-Choice Network Design Problems. In Hybrid Algorithms for Service, Computing and Manufacturing Systems: Routing and Scheduling Solutions (J. R. Montoya-Torres, A.A. Juan, L.H. Huatuco, J. Faulin, and Gloria L. Rodriguez-Verjan, eds.), IGI Global. Hershey, Pa., 2012. pp. 294-324.
43. Eiben, A.E., and J.E. Smith. Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Springer, Berlin, 2003.
44. Syswerda, G. Uniform Crossover in Genetic Algorithms. Proc, 3rd International Conference on Genetic Algorithms (J. D. Schaffer, ed.), Morgan-Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, Calif, 1989. pp. 2-9.
45. Beasley, J. E., and PC. Chu. A Genetic Algorithm for the Set Covering Problem. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 94. No. 3. 1996. pp. 392-404.
46. Gen, M. and R. Cheng. Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.
47. Dempe, S. Foundations of llilevel Programming. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2002.
48. Xu, T. H. Wei, and G. Hu. Study on Continuous Network Design Problem Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 16. No. 2. 2009. pp. 1322-1328.
49. Sharma, S., S. V Ukkusuri, and TV Malhew. Pareto Optimal Multi-objective Optimization for Robust Transportation Network Design Problem. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Hoard, No. 2090. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. pp. 95-104.
50. Gallo, M., L. D'Acierno, and B. Monlella. A Meta-Heurislie Approach for Solving the Urban Network Design Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 201. No. 1. 2010. pp. 144-157.
51. Chakroborty, P. Genetic Algorithms for Optimal Urban Transit Network Design. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering. Vol. 18. No. 2,2003, pp. 184-200.
52. Bar-Gera, H. Origin-Based Algorithm for the Traffic Assignment Problem. Transportation Science, Vol. 36. No. 4,2002, pp. 398-417.
53. Slavin, H., J. Brandon, and A. Rabinowicz. An Empirical Comparison of Alternative User Equilibrium Traffic Assignment Methods. Presented at 200. European Transport Conference (ETC), Strasbourg, France, 2006.
54. Smith, H. Fires Sweep Greece Turning Villages to Ash and Killing 46. The Observer, Aug. 25. 2007. p. 35. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/aug/26/greecc, Accessed July 27,2013.