A Review on Carotid Ultrasound Atherosclerotic Tissue Characterization and Stroke Risk Stratification in Machine Learning Framework

Current Atherosclerosis Reports

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Sharma, Aditya M ^a   Gupta, Ajay ^b   Kumar, P Krishna ^c,j   Rajan, Jeny ^c,j   Saba, Luca ^d   Nobutaka, Ikeda ^e   Laird, John R ^f   Nicolades, Andrew ^g,h   Suri, Jasjit S ^i,j,k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KARNATAKA   (India)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

^e NATIONAL CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH AND MEDICINE   (Japan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

ⁱ Monitoring and Diagnostic Division   (United States)

^j Global Biomedical Technologies Inc   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Carotid artery disease; Computer aided diagnosis; Machine learning; Plaque morphology; Tissue characterization; Ultrasonic features; Vascular atherosclerosis

Indexed keywords

ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; BLOOD VESSEL WALL; CAROTID ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ECHOGRAPHY; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TISSUE STRUCTURE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASE; COMPLICATION; STROKE;

ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CAROTID ARTERY DISEASES; HUMANS; RISK FACTORS; STROKE;

EID: 84938339653     PISSN: 15233804     EISSN: 15346242     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11883-015-0529-2     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Cardiovascular disease report. World heart federation 2010.http://www.world-heartfederation.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/WHD2010/FINALStateofthHeartCVDReport121010.pdf. 2010.
2. WHO factsheet on cardiovascular disease. (Last updated on March 2013) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/
3. Giannoukos G, Min M. Mathematical and physical modelling of the dynamic fluidic impedance of arteries using electrical impedance equivalents. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2014;37(5):711–7.
4. Friera F, Leticia, Ibáñez B, Fuster V. Imaging subclinical atherosclerosis: is it ready for prime time? A Rev J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014;7(7):623–34. This article offers an overview of the traditional and emerging non-invasive imaging modalities used to detect early atherosclerosis.
5. Katakami N, Takahara M, Kaneto H, Sakamoto KY, Yoshiuchi K, Irie Y, et al. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of carotid plaque improves the prediction of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients a pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2640–6.
6. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. 1997;96(5):1432–7.
7. Wu TH, Kuo HC, Tain YL, Lin KM, Chien SJ. Common carotid artery intima-media thickness is useful for diagnosis of the acute stage of Kawasaki disease. BMC Paediatr. 2014;14(1):98.
8. Granada JF, Feinstein SB. Imaging of the vasa vasorum. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5 Suppl 2:S18–25.
9. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220(1):179–85.
10. Reiter M, Horvat R, Puchner S, Rinner W, Polterauer P, Lammer J, et al. Plaque imaging of the internal carotid artery-correlation of B-flow imaging with histopathology. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(1):122–6.
11. Das M, Braunschweig T, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH, Krings T, Langer S, et al. Carotid plaque analysis: comparison of dual-source computed tomography (CT) findings and histopathological correlation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(1):14–9.
12. Schuster L, Hauser T, Essig M. Significance of MR angiography for imaging diagnostics of carotid artery diseases. Radiologe. 2010;50(7):597–606.
13. Wyman RA, Mays ME, McBride PE, Stein JH. Ultrasound-detected carotid plaque as a predictor of cardiovascular events. Vasc Med. 2006;11(2):123–30.
14. Polak JF, Shemanski L, O’Leary DH. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovasc Health Study Radiol. 1998;208(3):649–54.
15. AbuRahma AF, Wulu JT, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1772–5.
16. Xiong L, Deng YB, Zhu Y, Liu YN, Bi XJ. Correlation of carotid plaque neovascularization detected by using contrast-enhanced US with clinical symptoms. Radiology. 2009;251(2):583–9.
17. Yoshida K, Narumi O, Chin M, Inoue K, Tabuchi T, Oda K, et al. Characterization of carotid atherosclerosis and detection of soft plaque with use of black-blood MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(5):868–74.
18. Gupta A, Mtui EE, Baradaran H, Salama G, Pandya A, Kamel H, et al. CT angiographic features of symptom-producing plaque in moderate-grade carotid artery stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;36(5):1–8. This study is about the association between soft and hard (calcified) plaque thickness measurements on CTA and symptomatic disease status in patients with moderate-grade carotid artery stenosis.
19. Gupta A, Baradaran H, Kamel H, Pandya A, Mangla A, Dunning A, et al. Evaluation of computed tomography angiography plaque thickness measurements in high-grade carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 2014;45(3):740–5.
20. Madani A, Beletsky V, Tamayo A, Munoz C, Spence JD. High-risk asymptomatic carotid stenosis ulceration on 3D ultrasound vs TCD microemboli. Neurology. 2011;77(8):744–50.
21. Saba L, Anzidei M, Marincola BC, Piga M, Raz E, Bassareo PP, et al. Imaging of the carotid artery vulnerable plaque. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(3):572–85. This paper explains the concept of “vulnerable plaque” and also describes the imaging characteristics of “vulnerable carotid plaques.”.
22. Joshi FR, Lindsay AC, Obaid DR, Falk E, Rudd JH. Non-invasive imaging of atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J-Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(3):205–18. Explains the importance of imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging methods and thier capability of reporting the underlying pathology.
23. Portanova A, Hakakian N, Mikulis DJ, Virmani R, Abdalla WM, Wasserman BA. Intracranial vasa vasorum: insights and implications for imaging. Radiology. 2013;267(3):667–79.
24. Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmani R, Yao JS. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(5):755–65.
25. Mughal MM, Khan MK, DeMarco JK, Majid A, Shamoun F, Abela GS. Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery plaque. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011;9(10):1315–30.
26. Keenan NG, Sheppard MN, Nott DM, Pennell DJ, Mohiaddin RH. Carotid plaque rupture. Lancet. 2009;374(9702):1703.
27. Lindenmaier TJ, Buchanan DN, Pike D, Hartley T, Reid RD, Spence JD, et al. One, two and threedimensional ultrasound measurements of carotid atherosclerosis before and after cardiac rehabilitation: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11(1):39.
28. McCarthy MJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM, Jones L, London NJM, Bell PRF, et al. Angiogenesis and the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: an association between symptomatology and plaque morphology. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30(2):261–8.
29. Dunmore BJ, McCarthy MJ, Naylor AR, Brindle NP. Carotid plaque instability and ischemic symptoms are linked to immaturity of microvessels within plaques. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(1):155–59.
30. Feinstein SB. The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287(2):H450–7.
31. Shah F, Balan P, Weinberg M, Reddy V, Neems R, Feinstein M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization: a new surrogate marker of atherosclerosis? Vasc Med. 2007;12(4):291–7.
32. Dumont TM, Rughani AI. National trends in carotid artery revascularization surgery: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(6):1251–7.
33. Schneider PA, Naylor AR. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis-medical therapy alone versus medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy or stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(2):274–81.
34. Virmani R, Ladich ER, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD. Histopathology of carotid atherosclerotic disease. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(5):S219–S3.
35. Loizou CP, Petroudi S, Pantziaris M, Nicolaides AN, Pattichis CS. An integrated system for the segmentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque ultrasound video. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61(1):86–101.
36. El-Barghouty N, Nicolaides A, Bahal V, Geroulakos G, Androulakis A. The identification of the high risk carotid plaque. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11(4):470–8.
37. Lal BK, Hobson II RW, Pappas PJ, Kubicka R, Hameed M, Chakhtura EY, et al. Pixel distribution analysis of B-mode ultrasound scan images predicts histologic features of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(6):1210–7.
38. Irie Y, Katakami N, Kaneto H, Takahara M, Sakamoto KY, Kosugi K, et al. The risk factors associated with ultrasonic tissue characterization of carotid plaque in type 2 diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complicat. 2014;28(4):523–7.
39. Nicolaides AN, Kakkos SK, Kyriacou E, Griffin M, Sabetai M, Thomas DJ, et al. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(6):1486–96.
40. European Carotid Plaque Study Group. Carotid artery plaque composition—relationship to clinical presentation and ultrasound B-mode imaging. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;10(1):23–30.
41. Chiu B, Shamdasani V, Entrekin R, Yuan C, Kerwin WS. Characterization of carotid plaques on 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging by registration with multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(10):1567–80.
42. Hitchner E, Zayed MA, Lee G, Morrison D, Lane B, Zhou W. Intravascular ultrasound as a clinical adjunct for carotid plaque characterization. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(3):774–80.
43. Irshad K, Millar S, Velu R, Reid AW, Diethrich EB, Reid DB. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound in carotid interventions. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14(2):198–207.
44. Diethrich EB, Margolis MP, Reid DB, Burke A, Ramaiah V, Rodriguez-Lopez JA, et al. Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of carotid artery disease: the Carotid Artery Plaque Virtual Histology Evaluation (CAPITAL) study. J Endovascther. 2007;14(5):676–86.
45. González A, López-Rueda A, Gutiérrez I, Moniche F, Cayuela A, Bustamante A, et al. Carotid plaque characterization by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound related to the timing of carotid intervention. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(6):764–73.
46. Acharya UR, Krishnan, Muthu Rama Krishnan M, Vinitha Sree S, Sanches J, Shafique S, et al. Plaque tissue characterization and classification in ultrasound carotid scans: a paradigm for vascular feature amalgamation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2013;62(2):392–400. Proposed a CAD system to effectively classify symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques from B-mode ultrasound carotid images. Several grayscale features are extracted that quantify the textural differences inherent in the plaque regions and selected the most significant among them.
47. Erikson KR, Fry FJ, Jones JP. Ultrasound in medicine—a review. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrasonics. 1974;21(3):144–70.
48. Hurtut T, Gousseau Y, Schmitt F. Adaptive image retrieval based on the spatial organization of colors. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2008;112(2):101–13.
49. Christodoulou CI, Pattichis CS, Kyriacou E, Nicolaides A. Image retrieval and classification of carotid plaque ultrasound images. Open Cardiovasc Imaging J. 2010;2:18–28.
50. Wilhjelm JE, Gronholdt ML, Wiebe B, Jespersen SK, Hansen LK, Sillesen H. Quantitative analysis of ultrasound B-mode images of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: correlation with visual classification and histological examination. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(6):910–22.
51. Niu L, Qian M, Yang W, Meng L, Xiao Y, Wong KKL, et al. Surface roughness detection of arteries via texture analysis of ultrasound images for early diagnosis of atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76880.
52. Wagner RF, Smith SW, Sandrik JM, Lopez H. Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrasonics. 1983;30(3):156–63.
53. Guan F, Ton P, Ge S, Zhao L. Anisotropic diffusion filtering for ultrasound speckle reduction. Sci China Technol Sci. 2014;57(3):607–14.
54. Magnin PA, von Ramm OT, Thurstone FL. Frequency compounding for speckle contrast reduction in phased array images. Ultrason Imaging. 1982;4(3):267–81.
55. Zacharatos H, Hassan AE, Qureshi AI. Intravascular ultrasound: principles and cerebrovascular applications. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(4):586–97.
56. Christodoulou CI, Pattichis CS, Pantziaris M, Nicolaides A. Texture based classification of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003;22(7):902–12.
57. Tsiaparas NN, Golemati S, Andreadis I, Stoitsis JS, Valavanis I, Nikita KS. Comparison of multiresolution features for texture classification of carotid atherosclerosis from B-mode ultrasound. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2011;15(1):130–7.
58. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet. 1973;3(6):610–21.
59. Gupta L, Srinath MD. Contour sequence moments for the classification of closed planar shapes. Pattern Recogn. 1987;20(3):267–72.
60. Asvestas P, Golemati S, Matsopoulos GK, Nikita KS, Nicolaides AN. Fractal dimension estimation of carotid atherosclerotic plaques from B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28(9):1129–36.
61. Wu CM, Chen YC, Hsieh KS. Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(2):141–52.
62. Deans, S. R. The Radon transform and some of its applications. Courier Dover Publications 2007.
63. Fogel I, Sagi D. Gabor filters as texture discriminator. Biol Cybern. 1989;61(2):103–13.
64. Acharya UR, Faust O, Alvin APC, Krishnamurthi G, Seabra JCR, Sanches J, et al. Understanding symptomatology of atherosclerotic plaque by image-based tissue characterization. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2013;110(1):66–75.
65. Mirmehdi, M., Xie, X., Suri, J.S. Handbook of texture analysis. Imperial College Press 2009.
66. Acharya UR, Faust O, Alvin APC, Vinitha Sree S, Molinari F, Saba L, et al. Symptomatic vs. asymptomatic plaque classification in carotid ultrasound. J Med Syst. 2012;36(3):1861–71. This article presents a CAD system which analyzes ultrasound images and classifies them into symptomatic and asymptomatic based on a combination of discrete wavelet transform, higher order spectra and textural features. Also proposed an integrated index, a unique number called symptomatic asymptomatic carotid index (SACI) to discriminate symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid ultrasound images.
67. Acharya UR, VinithaSree S, Molinari F, Saba L, Nicolaides AN, Suri JS. An automated technique for carotid far wall classification using grayscale features and wall thickness variability. J Clin Ultrasound. 2014;42(5):302–11. This article describes a Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) method for identification of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid ultrasound images to be applied for the early diagnosis of atherosclerosis, on images that could contain a light plaque.
68. Abd-Allah F, Abo-Krysha N, Baligh E. Carotid atherosclerosis: socio demographic issues, the hidden dimensions. Perspect Med. 2012;1(1):167–9.
69. Shrivastava VK, Londhe ND, Sonawane RS, Suri JS. Reliable and accurate psoriasis disease classification in dermatology images using comprehensive feature space in machine learning paradigm. Exp Syst Appl. 2015;42(15):6184–95.
70. El-Baz A, Beache GM, Gimel’farb G, Suzuki K, Okada K, Elnakib A, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis systems for lung cancer: challenges and methodologies. Intl J Biomed Imaging. 2013;2013:1–46.
71. Suri JS, Kathuria C, Molinari F. Atherosclerosis disease management. London: Springer; 2010.
72. Sanches JM, Laine AF, Suri JS. Ultrasound imaging: advances and applications. London: Springer; 2012.
73. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 1987;2(1):37–52.
74. Acharya UR, Vinitha Sree S, Muthu Rama Krishnan M, Molinari F, Saba L, Ho SYS, et al. Atherosclerotic risk stratification strategy for carotid arteries using texture-based features. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38(6):899–915. This article presents a CAD based ultrasound characterization methodology that classifies the patient into symptomatic and asymptomatic classes using two kinds of datasets: (1) plaque regions in ultrasound carotids segmented semi-automatically and (2) far wall gray-scale IMT regions along the common carotid artery segmented automatically.
75. Acharya UR, Faust O, Vineetha Sree S, Molinari F, Saba L, Nicolaides A, et al. An accurate and generalized approach to plaque characterization in 346 carotid ultrasound scans. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2012;61(4):1045–53. The article describes a patented CAD system called Atheromatic™ for symptomatic versus asymptomatic plaque classification in carotid ultrasound images. Feature extraction is done using a combination of discrete wavelet transform and averaging algorithms and SVM is used for classification.
76. Mougiakakou SG, Golemati S, Gousias I, Nicolaides AN, Nikita KS. Computer-aided diagnosis of carotid atherosclerosis based on ultrasound image statistics, laws’ texture and neural networks. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(1):26–36.
77. Kyriacou E, Pattichis MS, Pattichis CS, Mavrommatis A, Christodoulou CI, Kakkos S, et al. Classification of atherosclerotic carotid plaques using morphological analysis on ultrasound images. J Appl Intell. 2009;30(1):3–23.
78. Kohavi, R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Proceedings of International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence 1995; 14(2): 1137–1145.
79. Pedro LM, Sanches JM, Seabra J, Suri JS, Fernandes e Fernandes J. Asymptomatic carotid disease—a new tool for assessing neurological risk. Echocardiography. 2014;31(3):353–61. A new computer-assisted HDU method to study the echomorphology of the carotid plaque and to determine a risk score for developing appropriate symptoms is proposed in this study. A clinical score—enhanced activity index (EAI)—was obtained and correlated with the presence or absence of ipsilateral appropriate ischemic symptoms.
80. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW, Fletcher GS. Clinical epidemiology: the essentials. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
81. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2006;27(8):861–74.
82. Flach, P. The many faces of ROC analysis in machine learning. ICML Tutorial 2004.
83. Ferrero GVS, Seabra J, Leor OR, Vida AS, Aja-Fernández S, Palencia C, et al. Gamma mixture classifier for plaque detection in intravascular ultrasonic image. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014;61(1):44–61.
84. AbuRahma AF, Thiele SP, Wulu Jr JT. Prospective controlled study of the natural history of asymptomatic 60% to 69% carotid stenosis according to ultrasonic plaque morphology. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(3):437–43.
85. Wold, H. Partial least squares. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences 1985.
86. Scholkopft, B., Mullert, K.R. Fisher discriminant analysis with kernels. Neural networks for signal processing IX 1999.
87. Molinari F, Zeng G, Suri JS. A state of the art review on intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2010;100(3):201–21.
88. Molinari F, Meiburger KM, Saba L, Acharya UR, Ledda G, Zeng G, et al. Ultrasound IMT measurement on a multi-ethnic and multi-institutional database: our review and experience using four fully automated and one semi-automated methods. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2012;108(3):946–60. This article compares fully automated and semi-automated IMT measurement techniques. This was the first time that completely automated and user-driven techniques have been compared on a multi-ethnic dataset, acquired using multiple original equipment manufacturer (OEM) machines with different gain settings, representing normal and pathologic cases.
89. Steinl DC, Kaufmann BA. Ultrasound imaging for risk assessment in atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(5):9749–69.
90. Molinari F, Zeng G, Suri JS. Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010;57(5):1112–24.
91. Saba L, Meiburger KM, Molinari F, Ledda G, Anzidei M, Acharya UR, et al. Carotid IMT variability (IMTV) and its validation in symptomatic versus asymptomatic Italian population: can this be a useful index for studying symptomaticity? Echocardiography. 2012;29(9):1111–9.
92. Saba L, Mallarini G, Sanfilippo R, Zeng G, Montisci R. Intima media thickness variability (IMTV) and its association with cerebrovascular events: a novel marker of carotid atherosclerosis? Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2(1):10–8.
93. Acharya, R. Advances in cardiac signal processing. S. M. Krishnan, J. A. Spaan, J. S. Suri (Eds.). Berlin: Springer 2007.
94. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664–72.
95. Saba L, Potters F, van der Lugt A, Mallarini G. Imaging of the fibrous cap in atherosclerotic carotid plaque. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(4):681–9.
96. Virmani R, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A. Pathology of the thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque. J Interv Cardiol. 2003;16(3):267–72.
97. Spagnoli LG, Bonanno E, Sangiorgi G, Mauriello A. Role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(11):1800–15.
98. Maseri A, Fuster V. Is there a vulnerable plaque? Circulation. 2003;107(16):2068–71.
99. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2014;7(10):1025–38.
100. Acharya UR, Mookiah MRK, Sree SV, Afonso D, Sanches J, Shafique S, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque tissue characterization in 2D ultrasound longitudinal carotid scans for automated classification: a paradigm for stroke risk assessment. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013;51(5):513–23.
101. Kakkos SK, Stevens JM, Nicolaides AN, Kyriacou E, Pattichis CS, Geroulakos G, et al. Texture analysis of ultrasonic images of symptomatic carotid plaques can identify those plaques associated with ipsilateral embolic brain infarction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(4):422–9.
102. Kyriacou EC, Petroudi S, Pattichis CS, Pattichis MS, Griffin M, Kakkos S, et al. Prediction of high-risk asymptomatic carotid plaques based on ultrasonic image features. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2012;16(5):966–73.
103. Tsiaparas NN, Golemati S, Andreadis I, Stoitsis J, Valavanis I, Nikita KS. Assessment of carotid atherosclerosis from B-mode ultrasound images using directional multi scale texture features. Meas Sci Technol. 2012;23(11):114004.