Theme and variations: Evolutionary diversification of the HET-s functional amyloid motif

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Daskalov, Asen ^a,c   Dyrka, Witold ^a,b   Saupe, Sven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^b WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLOID; FUNGAL PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMYLOID; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FUNGAL PROTEINS; POSITION-SPECIFIC SCORING MATRICES; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS;

EID: 84938152169     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep12494     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. T. Eichner & S. E. Radford A diversity of assembly mechanisms of a generic amyloid fold. Mol Cell 43, 8 (2011).
2. T. P. Knowles, M. Vendruscolo & C. M. Dobson The amyloid state and its association with protein misfolding diseases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15, 384 (2014).
3. M. Jucker & L. C. Walker Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 501, 45 (2013).
4. J. L. Silva, C. V. De Moura Gallo, D. C. Costa & L. P. Rangel Prion-like aggregation of mutant p53 in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 39, 260 (2014).
5. J. Greenwald & R. Riek Biology of amyloid: structure, function, and regulation. Structure 18, 1244 (2010).
6. C. L. Pham, A. H. Kwan & M. Sunde Functional amyloid: widespread in Nature, diverse in purpose. Essays in biochemistry 56, 207 (2014).
7. A. K. Syed & B. R. Boles Fold modulating function: bacterial toxins to functional amyloids. Frontiers in microbiology 5, 401 (2014).
8. G. A. Newby & S. Lindquist Blessings in disguise: biological benefits of prion-like mechanisms. Trends Cell Biol 23, 251 (2013).
9. J. Li et al. The RIP1/RIP3 necrosome forms a functional amyloid signaling complex required for programmed necrosis. Cell 150, 339 (2012).
10. A. Daskalov et al. Signal Transduction by a Fungal NOD-Like Receptor Based on Propagation of a Prion Amyloid Fold. PLoS Biol 13, e1002059 (2015).
11. A. Daskalov, M. Paoletti, F. Ness & S. J. Saupe Genomic clustering and homology between HET-S and the NWD2 STAND protein in various fungal genomes. Plos One 7, e34854 (2012).
12. C. Seuring et al. The mechanism of toxicity in HET-S/HET-s prion incompatibility. PLoS Biol 10, e1001451 (2012).
13. J. Greenwald et al. The mechanism of prion inhibition by HET-S. Mol Cell 38, 889 (Jun 25, 2010).
14. A. Balguerie et al. Domain organization and structure-function relationship of the HET-s prion protein of Podospora anserina. Embo J 22, 2071 (2003).
15. C. Ritter et al. Correlation of structural elements and infectivity of the HET-s prion. Nature 435, 844 (2005).
16. H. Van Melckebeke et al. Atomic-resolution three-dimensional structure of HET-s(218-289) amyloid fibrils by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 132, 13765 (2010).
17. C. Wasmer et al. Amyloid fibrils of the HET-s(218-289) prion form a beta solenoid with a triangular hydrophobic core. Science 319, 1523 (2008).
18. L. Benkemoun et al. Two structurally similar fungal prions efficiently cross-seed in vivo but form distinct polymers when coexpressed. Mol Microbiol 82, 1392 (2011).
19. C. Wasmer et al. Structural similarity between the prion domain of HET-s and a homologue can explain amyloid cross-seeding in spite of limited sequence identity. J Mol Biol 402, 311 (Sep 17, 2010).
20. V. Mathur, C. Seuring, R. Riek, S. J. Saupe & S. W. Liebman Localization of HET-S to the cell periphery, not to [Het-s] aggregates, is associated with [Het-s]-HET-S toxicity. Mol Cell Biol 32, 139 (2012).
21. X. Cai et al. Prion-like Polymerization Underlies Signal Transduction in Antiviral Immune Defense and Inflammasome Activation. Cell 156, 1207 (2014).
22. H. Wu Higher-order assemblies in a new paradigm of signal transduction. Cell 153, 287 (2013).
23. A. V. Kajava, K. Klopffleisch, S. Chen & K. Hofmann Evolutionary link between metazoan RHIM motif and prion-forming domain of fungal heterokaryon incompatibility factor HET-s/HET-s. Scientific reports 4, 7436 (2014).
24. W. Dyrka et al. Diversity and Variability of NOD-Like Receptors in Fungi. Genome biology and evolution 6, 3137 (2014).
25. A. Daskalov et al. Contribution of specific residues of the beta-solenoid fold to HET-s prion function, amyloid structure and stability. PLoS Pathog 10, e1004158 (2014).
26. W. Wan & G. Stubbs Fungal prion HET-s as a model for structural complexity and self-propagation in prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 5201 (2014).
27. H. Kamisetty, S. Ovchinnikov & D. Baker Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence-and structure-rich era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 15674 (2013).
28. P. Tian et al. Structure of a functional amyloid protein subunit computed using sequence variation. J Am Chem Soc 137, 22 (2015).
29. H. H. Park et al. The death domain superfamily in intracellular signaling of apoptosis and inflammation. Annual review of immunology 25, 561 (2007).
30. S. F. Altschul et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389 (1997).
31. T. L. Bailey et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37, W202 (2009).
32. J. Felsenstein PHYLIP-Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164 (1989).
33. D. T. Jones, W. R. Taylor & J. M. Thornton The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Computer applications in the biosciences : CABIOS 8, 275 (1992).
34. P. Rice, I. Longden & A. Bleasby EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends Genet 16, 276 (2000).
35. M. S. Waterman & M. Eggert A new algorithm for best subsequence alignments with application to tRNA-rRNA comparisons. J Mol Biol 197, 723 (1987).
36. X. Huang & M. Miller A time-efficient, linear-space local similarity algorithm. Adv. Appl. Math 12, 373 (1991).
37. T. F. Smith & M. S. Waterman Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 147, 195 (1981).
38. M. Jacomy, T. Venturini, S. Heymann & M. Bastian ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PLoS One 9, e98679 (2014).
39. M. Bastian, S. Heymann & M. Jacomy Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. The AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California (2009).
40. V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte & E. Lefebvre Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechaniscs: Theory and Experiment 10, P10008 (2008).
41. G. E. Crooks, G. Hon, J. M. Chandonia & S. E. Brenner WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14, 1188 (2004).
42. C. F. Alzola & F. E. Harrell An introduction to S and Hmisc and Design Libraries. http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/twiki/pub/Main/RS/sintro.pdf (2006) (Date of access:01/02/2015).
43. P. E. Meyer Information-Theoretic variable selection and network inference from microarray data. PhD thesis. Université Libre de Bruxelles, (2008).