Is the increased risk of preterm birth following excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia restricted to the first birth post treatment?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 122, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1191-1199

  Castanon A ^a   Landy, R ^a   Brocklehurst, P ^b   Evans, H ^c   Peebles, D ^b   Singh, N ^d   Walker, P ^c   Patnick, J ^e   Sasieni, P ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d BARTS HEALTH NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e PUBLIC HEALTH ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; conisation; large loop excision of the transformation zone; preterm delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH ORDER; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLPOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUNCH BIOPSY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEWBORN; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK; RISK FACTOR; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; ODDS RATIO; PREGNANCY; PREMATURE BIRTH; RISK FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84937971223     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13398     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bruinsma FJ, Quinn MA,. The risk of preterm birth following treatment for precancerous changes in the cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2011; 118: 1031-41.
2. Castanon A, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, Walker P, et al., Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012; 345: e5174.
3. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch PL, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E,. Obstetric outcome after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006; 367: 489-98.
4. Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, Exeter M, Whittaker J, McCowan L,. Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA 2004; 291: 2100-6.
5. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK,. Depth of cervical cone removed by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1232-8.
6. Castanon A, Landy R, Brocklehurst P, Evans H, Peebles D, Singh N, et al., Risk of preterm delivery with increasing depth of excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in England: nested case-control study. BMJ 2014; 349: g6223.
7. Noehr B, Jensen A, Frederiksen K, Tabor A, Kjaer SK,. Loop electrosurgical excision of the cervix and subsequent risk for spontaneous preterm delivery: a population-based study of singleton deliveries during a 9-year period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 33 e1-6.
8. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Paavonen J, Tapper AM,. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 504-10.
9. Health & Social Care Information Centre. What is HES? 2013 [ www.hscic.gov.uk/hes ]. Accessed 3 March 2014.
10. Spong CY,. Defining "term" pregnancy: recommendations from the Defining "Term" Pregnancy Workgroup. JAMA 2013; 309: 2445-6.
11. Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P, Girardi F, Haefner H, Menton M, et al., 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 166-72.
12. Cuzick J,. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Statist Med 1985; 4: 87-90.
13. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R,. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75-84.
14. Hill AB,. The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 1965; 58: 295-300.
15. Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, Paavonen J, Tapper AM,. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 309-13.
16. Heinonen A, Gissler M, Riska A, Paavonen J, Tapper AM, Jakobsson M,. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the risk for preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1063-8.
17. Office for National Statistics. Age-specific fertility rates (ASFRs), constituent countries of the UK, 2010. Fertility Summary, 2010 [ www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/fertility-analysis/fertility-summary/2010/uk-fertility-summary.html ]. Accessed 13 September 2014.
18. Office for National Statistics. The Changing Age Pattern of Fertility. 2012 [ www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/fertility-analysis/cohort-fertility-England-and-Wales/2012/cohort-fertility-2012.html#tab-The-Changing-Age-Pattern-of-Fertility ]. Accessed 13 September 2014.
19. Chyi LJ, Lee HC, Hintz SR, Gould JB, Sutcliffe TL,. School outcomes of late preterm infants: special needs and challenges for infants born at 32 to 36 weeks gestation. J Pediatrics 2008; 153: 25-31.
20. Linnet KM, Wisborg K, Agerbo E, Secher NJ, Thomsen PH, Henriksen TB,. Gestational age, birth weight, and the risk of hyperkinetic disorder. Arch Dis Childhood 2006; 91: 655-60.
21. Morse SB, Zheng H, Tang Y, Roth J,. Early school-age outcomes of late preterm infants. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e622-9.
22. Quigley MA, Poulsen G, Boyle E, Wolke D, Field D, Alfirevic Z, et al., Early term and late preterm birth are associated with poorer school performance at age 5 years: a cohort study. Arch Disease Childhood Fetal Neonat Ed 2012; 97: F167-73.
23. van Baar AL, Vermaas J, Knots E, de Kleine MJ, Soons P,. Functioning at school age of moderately preterm children born at 32 to 36 weeks' gestational age. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 251-7.
24. Woythaler MA, McCormick MC, Smith VC,. Late preterm infants have worse 24-month neurodevelopmental outcomes than term infants. Pediatrics 2011; 127: e622-9.
25. NHS Information Centre for health and Social Care. NHS Maternity Statistics-England. 2000 -2010 [ http://www.hscic.gov.uk/searchcatalogue?productid=116&q=title%3a%22nhs+maternity+statistics%22&sort=Most+recent&size=10&page=1#top ]. Accessed 3 March 2014.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. VitalStats. 2010 [ www.cdc.gov/nchs/vitalstats.htm ]. Accessed 23 September 2014.
27. Halfon N, Houtrow A, Larson K, P N,. The changing landscape of disability in childhood. Future Child 2012; 22: 13-42. [ http://futureofchildren.org/futureofchildren/publications/docs/22-01-02.pdf ]. Accessed 18 September 2014.