A measure of confidence in Bland - Altman analysis for the interchangeability of two methods of measurement

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 257-259

  Preiss, David ^a   Fisher, Joseph ^a  

^a TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agreement; Bland Altman; Correlation

Indexed keywords

AGREEMENT; BLAND-ALTMAN; CORRELATION; CORRELATION CO-EFFICIENT; DATA RANGES;

CORRELATION METHODS;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BLAND ALTMAN ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HEART FAILURE; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 51049114029     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-008-9127-y     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med 1989;19(1):61-70
2. Lee J. Evaluating agreement between two methods for measuring the same quantity: A response. Comput Biol Med 1992;22(5):369-371
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990;20(5):337-340
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: Analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22(1):85-93
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10
6. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput 1999;15(2):85-91