A prospective study of the accuracy and precision of continuous cardiac output monitoring devices as compared to intermittent thermodilution

Minerva Anestesiologica

Volumn 76, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1010-1017

  Cecconi, M ^a   Dawson, D ^a   Casaretti, R ^a   Grounds, R M ^a   Rhodes, A ^a  

^a ST GEORGE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Cardiac output; Thermodilution

Indexed keywords

DOPEXAMINE; LITHIUM; NORADRENALIN;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ALARM MONITOR; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DILUTION CURVE; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG MEGADOSE; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE PRESSURE; THERMODILUTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; CARDIAC OUTPUT; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; LITHIUM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 78651263698     PISSN: 03759393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kern JW, Shoemaker WC. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med 2002;30: 1686-92.
2. Poeze M, Greve J, Ramsay G. Meta-analysis of hemodynamic optimization: relationship to methodological quality. Critical Care (London, England) 2005;9:R771-9.
3. Jansen JR. The thermodilution method for the clinical assessment of cardiac output. Intensive Care Med 1995;21: 691-7.
4. Jansen JR, Johnson RW, Yan JY, Verdouw PD. Near continuous cardiac output by thermodilution. J Clin Monit 1997;13: 233-9.
5. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:350-6.
6. Donati A, Nardella R, Gabbanelli V, Scarcella M, Romanelli M, Romagnoli L et al. The ability of PiCCO versus LiDCOvariables to detect changes in cardiac index: a prospective clinical study. Minerva Anestesiol 2008;74:367-74.
7. Hamilton TT, Huber LM, Jessen ME. PulseCO: a less-invasive method to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:S1408-12.
8. Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. ExpertRevMed Devices 2005;2:523-7.
9. Maus TM, Lee DE. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008;22:468-73.
10. Zangrillo A, Maj G, Monaco F, Scandroglio AM, Nuzzi M, Plumari V et al. Cardiac Index validation using the Pressure Recording Analytic Method in unstable patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth [Epub ahead of print].
11. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J ClinMonitComput 1999;15:85-91.
12. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009;13:201.
13. Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:498-504.
14. Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth 2007;99:337-42.
15. Mcgee W, Horswell J, Calderon J. Validation of a continuous, arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement: a multicenter, prospective clinical trial. Critical Care (London, England) 2007;11:R105.
16. Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth 2008;100:451-6.
17. Prasser C, Trabold B, Schwab A, Keyl C, Ziegler S, Wiesenack C. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for arterial pressurebased cardiac output assessment without external calibration. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:2223-5.
18. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schöllhorn T, Röhm KD, Mengistu AM, Suttner S. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: a comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007;98: 176-82.
19. Rhodes A. Arterial Pulse Power Analysis: The LiDCOplus System. In: Pinsky MR, editor. Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2004. p. 183-92.
20. Pittman J, Bar-Yosef S, SumPing J, Sherwood M, Mark J. Continuous cardiac output monitoring with pulse contour analysis: a comparison with lithium indicator dilution cardiac output measurement. Crit Care Med 2005;33:2015-21.
21. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/VigileoTM system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007;99: 329-36.