Bilateral Mastectomy versus Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The Role of Breast Reconstruction

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 135, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1518-1526

  Albornoz, Claudia R ^a,b   Matros, Evan ^a,b   Lee, Clara N ^a,b   Hudis, Clifford A ^a,b   Pusic, Andrea L ^a,b   Elkin, Elena ^a,b   Bach, Peter B ^a,b   Cordeiro, Peter G ^a,b   Morrow, Monica ^a,b  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER CENTER; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MASTECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROLE PLAYING; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; SURVIVAL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR INVASION; UNITED STATES;

AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER CARE FACILITIES; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY, RADICAL; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEW YORK CITY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROLE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84937838492     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001276     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Darby S, McGale P, Correa C, et al.; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: Meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10,801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011;378:1707-1716.
2. Anderson SJ, Wapnir I, Dignam JJ, et al. Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2466-2473.
3. Zumsteg ZS, Morrow M, Arnold B, et al. Breast-conserving therapy achieves locoregional outcomes comparable to mastectomy in women with T1-2N0 triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3469-3476.
4. Mahmood U, Hanlon AL, Koshy M, et al. Increasing national mastectomy rates for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1436-1443.
5. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: A trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203-5209.
6. Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362-1367.
7. King TA, Sakr R, Patil S, et al. Clinical management factors contribute to the decision for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2158-2164.
8. Nichols HB, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Lacey JV Jr, et al. Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1564-1569.
9. Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, et al. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2697-2704.
10. Congress of the United Stated of America. Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998. Available at: http://www.cms. gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Health-Insurance-Reform/HealthInsReformforConsume/downloads/WHCRA- Statute.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2013.
11. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: Increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:15-23.
12. American College of Surgeons. National Cancer Database. Available at: http://www.facs.org/cancer/ncdb/index. html#. Accessed September 1, 2013.
13. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJJCC). Breast Cancer Staging. 7th ed. Available at: http://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/quickreferences/Documents/BreastMedium. pdf. Accessed December 1, 2013.
14. Greenberg CC, Lipsitz SR, Hughes ME, et al. Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: A study of the NCCN. Ann Surg. 2011;254:339-345.
15. Rosenberg SM, Tracy MS, Meyer ME, et al. Perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among young women with breast cancer: A cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:373-381.
16. Gao X, Fisher SG, Emami B. Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: A population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:1038-1045.
17. Abbott A, Rueth N, Pappas-Varco S, et al. Perceptions of contralateral breast cancer: An overestimation of risk. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3129-3136.
18. Han E, Johnson N, Glissmeyer M, et al. Increasing incidence of bilateral mastectomies: The patient perspective. Am J Surg. 2011;201:615-618.
19. Katz SJ, Morrow M. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: Addressing peace of mind. JAMA 2013;310:793-794.
20. Soran A, Ibrahim A, Kanbour M, et al. Decision making and factors influencing long-term satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy in women with breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;38:179-173.
21. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, et al. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer 2008;112:489-494.
22. Lee CN, Chang Y, Adimorah N, et al. Decision making about surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:1-10.
23. Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526-5533.
24. Osman F, Saleh F, Jackson TD, et al. Increased postoperative complications in bilateral mastectomy patients compared to unilateral mastectomy: An analysis of the NSQIP database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3212-3217.
25. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Expanding patient-centered care to empower patients and assist providers: Research in action. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/factsheets/patient-centered/ria-issue5/index.html. Accessed January 31, 2014.
26. Dhar R, Huber J, Khan U. The shopping momentum effect. J Market Res. 2007;44:370-378.
27. Gilbert DT, Pinel EC, Wilson TD, et al. Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. J Person Soc Psychol. 1998;75:617-638.
28. Sharot T, Velasquez CM, Dolan RJ. Do decisions shape preference? Evidence from blind choice. Psychol Sci. 2010;21:1231-1235.
29. Brehm JW. Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. J Abnorm Psychol. 1956;52:384-389.
30. Festinger L. Cognitive dissonance. Sci Am. 1962;207:93-102.