Increasing national mastectomy rates for the treatment of early stage breast cancer

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1436-1443

  Mahmood, Usama ^a   Hanlon, Alexandra L ^b   Koshy, Matthew ^c   Buras, Robert ^d   Chumsri, Saranya ^d   Tkaczuk, Katherine H ^d   Cheston, Sally B ^d   Regine, William F ^d   Feigenberg, Steven J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TUMOR LOCALIZATION;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MARITAL STATUS; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM STAGING; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE; SEER PROGRAM; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84880070478     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2732-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fisher B, Montague E, Redmond C, et al. Comparison of radical mastectomy with alternative treatments for primary breast cancer. A first report of results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 1977;39(6 Suppl):2827-39.
2. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665-73.
3. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6-11.
4. National Institutes of Health consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391-5.
5. Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health consensus development conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:628-37.
6. Du X, Freeman DH Jr, Syblik DA. What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;62:71-9.
7. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682-90.
8. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082-8.
9. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437-41.
10. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). About SEER. http://www.seer.cancer.gov/about.
11. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203-9.
12. Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1362-7.
13. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 5th edition. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press; 2000.
14. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley; 2000.
15. Alpert TE, Haffty BG. Conservative management of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004;5:37-42.
16. Haffty BG. Molecular and genetic markers in the local-regional management of breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002;12:329-40.
17. Robson M, Svahn T, McCormick B, et al. Appropriateness of breast-conserving treatment of breast carcinoma in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a clinic-based series. Cancer. 2005;103:44-51.
18. Robson ME, Boyd J, Borgen PI, et al. Hereditary breast cancer. Curr Probl Surg. 2001;38:387-480.
19. Pengel KE, Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, et al. The impact of preoperative MRI on breast-conserving surgery of invasive cancer: a comparative cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:161-9.
20. Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180-7.
21. Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):563-71.
22. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295-303.
23. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3248-58.
24. Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290-302.
25. Morrow M, Harris JR. More mastectomies: is this what patients really want? J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4038-40.
26. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773-83.
27. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Radiology. 2007;244:708-17.
28. Hawley ST, Griggs JJ, Hamilton AS, et al. Decision involvement and receipt of mastectomy among racially and ethnically diverse breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1337-47.
29. Balch CM, Jacobs LK. Mastectomies on the rise for breast cancer: "the tide is changing." Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2669-72.
30. Smith GL, Shih YC, Xu Y et al. Racial disparities in the use of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: a national Medicare study. Cancer. 2010;116:734-41.