Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 23, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 5526-5533

  Katz, Steven J ^a   Lantz, Paula M ^a   Janz, Nancy K ^a   Fagerlin, Angela ^a   Schwanz, Rendra ^a   Liu, Lihua ^a   Deapen, Dennis ^a   Salem, Barbara ^a   Lakhani, Indu ^a   Morrow, Monica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER REGISTRY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; MIDDLE AGED; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SEER PROGRAM;

EID: 24944436757     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.217     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. National Institutes of Health: The treatment of early stage breast cancer. http://www .consensus.nih.gov/cons/081/081_statement.htm, June 18-21, 1990
2. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists: Mastectomy or lumpectomy? The choice of operation for clinical stages I and II breast cancer. CMAJ 158:S15-S21, 1998 (suppl 3)
3. Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW, et al: Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52:277-300, 2002
4. National Cancer Institute: 1973-2001 SEER public-use data, http://www.seer.cancer.gov/ publicdata
5. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, et al: Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326:1102-1107, 1992
6. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Hoffman RG, et al: Minimal increase in use of breast conserving surgery from 1986-1990. Med Care 34:479-489, 1996
7. Lazovich D, Solomon CC, Thomas DB, et al: Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 86:628-637, 1999
8. Mandelblatt JS, Hadley J, Kerner JF, et al: Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women: Patient preferences and clinical and physical influences. Cancer 89:561-573, 2000
9. Hokanson P, Seshadri R, Miller KD: Under-utilization of breast-conserving therapy in a predominantly rural population: Need for improved surgeon and public education. Clinical Breast Cancer 1:72-76, 2000
10. Mor V, Laliberte LL, Petrisek AC, et al: Impact of breast cancer treatment guidelines on surgeon practice patterns: Results of a hospital-based intervention. Surgery 128:847-861, 2000
11. Baxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB, et al: Trends in the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:443-448, 2004
12. Bloom BS, de Pouvourville N, Chhatre S, et al: Breast cancer treatment in clinical practice compared to best evidence and practice guidelines. Br J Cancer 90:26-30, 2004
13. The surgical treatment of common diseases. Early stage breast cancer, in Wennberg JE, McAndrew Cooper M (eds): The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 1998. Chicago, IL, American Hospital Publishing Inc. 1998, p. 132. Last accessed on 7/7/2005 at http://www.dartmouthatlas .org/pdffiles/ATLAS98.PDF
14. Wennberg JE: Unwarranted variations in health care delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. BMJ 325:961-964, 2002
15. Hewitt M, Simone JV, eds: Institute of Medicine Report: Ensuring Quality Cancer Care-National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine Report and National Research Council. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1999, p 97
16. Lantz P, Zemencuk J, Katz SJ: Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda. Health Serv Res 37:417-431, 2002
17. Montini T: Resist and redirect: Physicians respond to breast cancer informed consent legislation. Women Health 26:85-104, 1997
18. Nayfield SG, Bongiovanni GC, Alciati MH: Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1202-1208, 1994
19. Guadagnoli E, Ward P: Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med 47:329-339, 1998
20. Keating NL, Weeks JC, Borbas C, et al: Treatment of early stage breast cancer: Do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed? Breast Cancer Res Treat 79:225-231, 2003
21. Katz SJ, Lantz P, Zemencuk J: Correlates of surgical treatment type for women with noninvasive and invasive breast cancer. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 10:659-670, 2001
22. Morrow M, Bucci C, Rademaker A: Medical contraindications are not a major factor in the underutilization of breast conserving therapy. J Am Coll Surg 186:269-274, 1998
23. Abeloff MD, Lichter AS, Niederhuber JE, et al: Breast, in Abeloff M, Armitage J, Lichter A, et al (eds): Clinical Oncology (ed 2). Philadelphia, PA, Churchill Livingstone, Inc, 2000, p 2094
24. Mandelblatt JS, Berg CD, Meropol NJ, et al: Measuring and predicting surgeons' practice styles for breast cancer treatment in older women. Med Care 39:228-242, 2001
25. Ganz PA, Schag CAC, Lee JJ, et al: The CARES: A generic measure of health related quality of life for patients with cancer. Qual Life Res 1:19-29, 1992
26. Anema MG, Brown BE: Increasing survey responses using the total design method. J Contin Educ Nurs 26:109-114, 1995
27. Degner LF, Krisjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al: Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277:1485-1492, 1997
28. American Joint Committee on Cancer: Cancer Staging Manual (ed 5). Chicago, IL, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 1997, pp 172-177
29. 2001 National Health Interview Survey: Public Use Data Release, Division of Health Interview Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/ Health_Statistics/NCHS/ Dataset_Documentation/ NHIS/2001/
30. Kriegsman DMW, Penninx BWJH, van Eijk JTM, et al: Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly: A study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1407-1417, 1996
31. Bush TL, Miller SR, Golden AL, et al: Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly. Am J Public Health 79:1554-1556, 1989
32. Ward S, Heidrick S, Wolberg W: Factors women take into account when deciding upon type of surgery for breast cancer. Cancer Nurs 12:344-351, 1989
33. Stafford D, Szczys R, Becker R, et al: How breast cancer treatment decisions are made by women in North Dakota. Am J Surg 176:515-519, 1998
34. Nold RJ, Beamer RL, Helmer SD, et al: Factors influencing a woman's choice to undergo breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy. Am J Surg 180:413-418, 2000
35. Emmanuel JE, Emanuel LL: Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 267: 2221-2226, 1992
36. Bottrell MM, Alpert H, Fischbach RL, et al: Hospital informed consent for procedure forms: Facilitating quality patient-physician interaction. Arch Surg 135:26-33, 2000
37. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, et al: Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane Review), in: The Cochrane Library, Issue I, Volume 4. Chichester, United Kingdom, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2004. Last accessed 7/7/2005 at http:/gateway.ut.ovid .com/gw2/ovidweb.cgi#toc
38. Whelan T, Sawka C, Levine M, et al: Helping patients make informed choices: A randomized trial of a decision aid for adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:581-587, 2003
39. Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, et al: Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res 40:745-768, 2005