Restricted Boltzmann machines modeling human choice

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

Volumn 1, Issue January, 2014, Pages 73-81

  Osogami, Takayuki ^a   Otsuka, Makoto ^a  

^a IBM RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOICE MODEL; COMPROMISE EFFECTS; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; RESTRICTED BOLTZMANN MACHINE;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 84937830333     PISSN: 10495258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. D. Ariely. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Harper Perennial, revised and expanded edition, 2010.
2. M. Bierlaire, K. Axhausen, and G. Abay. The acceptance of modal innovation: The case of Swissmetro. In Proceedings of the First Swiss Transportation Research Conference, March 2001.
3. E. Bonilla, S. Guo, and S. Sanner. Gaussian process preference elicitation. In J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, and A. Culotta, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, pages 262-270. 2010.
4. J. R. Busemeyer and J. T. Townsend. Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100:432-459, 1993.
5. O. Chapelle and Z. Harchaoui. A machine learning approach to conjoint analysis. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss, and L. Bottou, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17, pages 257-264. 2005.
6. B. Eric, N. de Freitas, and A. Ghosh. Active preference learning with discrete choice data. In J. C. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, and S. Roweis, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, pages 409-416. 2008.
7. V. F. Farias, S. Jagabathula, and D. Shah. A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Science, 59(2):305-322, 2013.
8. Y. Freund and D. Haussler. Unsupervised learning of distributions on binary vectors using two layer networks. Technical Report UCSC-CRL-94-25, University of California, Santa Cruz, June 1994.
9. H. Hruschka. Analyzing market baskets by restricted Boltzmann machines. OR Spectrum, pages 1-22, 2012.
10. R. D. Luce. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1959.
11. T. Osogami and T. Katsuki. A hierarchical Bayesian choice model with visibility. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2014), pages 3618-3623, August 2014.
12. T. Otter, J. Johnson, J. Rieskamp, G. M. Allenby, J. D. Brazell, A. Diederich, J. W. Hutchinson, S. MacEachern, S. Ruan, and J. Townsend. Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances. Marketing Letters, 19(3-4):255-267, 2008.
13. J. Rieskamp, J. R. Busemeyer, and B. A. Mellers. Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice. Journal of Economic Literature, 44:631-661, 2006.
14. R. M. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer, and J. T. Townsend. Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review, 108(2):370-392, 2001.
15. N. L. Roux and Y. Bengio. Representational power of restricted Boltzmann machines and deep belief networks. Neural Computation, 20(6):1631-1649, 2008.
16. P. Shenoy and A. J. Yu. Rational preference shifts in multi-attribute choice: What is fair? In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013), pages 1300-1305, 2013.
17. K. Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, second edition, 2009.
18. A. Tversky and I. Simonson. Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39(10):1179-1189, 1993.
19. M. Usher and J. L. McClelland. Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychological Review, 111(3):757-769, 2004.