A hierarchical Bayesian choice model with visibility

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3618-3623

  Osogami, Takayuki ^a   Katsuki, Takayuki ^a  

^a IBM RESEARCH TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Choice; Conjoint analysis; Hierarchical; Logit model

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; VISIBILITY;

CHOICE; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL; HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN MODELING; LOGIT MODELING; MAXIMUM A POSTERIORI ESTIMATION; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; POSTERIOR DISTRIBUTIONS;

SALES;

EID: 84919935648     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2014.622     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. O. Chapelle and Z. Harchaoui, "A machine learning approach to conjoint analysis," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17, L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss, and L. Bottou, Eds., 2005, pp. 257-264
2. B. Eric, N. de Freitas, and A. Ghosh, "Active preference learning with discrete choice data," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, J. C. Platt, D. Koller, Y. Singer, and S. Roweis, Eds., 2008, pp. 409-416
3. A. Jern, C. G. Lucas, and C. Kemp, "Evaluating the inverse decisionmaking approach to preference learning," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. S. Zemel, P. Bartlett, F. C. N. Pereira, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds., 2011, pp. 2276-2284
4. C. G. Lucas, T. L. Griffiths, F. Xu, and C. Fawcett, "A rational model of preference learning and choice prediction by children," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21, D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, and L. Bottou, Eds., 2009, pp. 985-992
5. P. Viappiani and C. Boutilier, "Optimal bayesian recommendation sets and myopically optimal choice query sets," in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23, J. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, and A. Culotta, Eds., 2010, pp. 2352-2360
6. J. R. Busemeyer and J. T. Townsend, "Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making," Psychological Review, vol. 100, pp. 432-459, 1993
7. T. Otter, J. Johnson, J. Rieskamp, G. M. Allenby, J. D. Brazell, A. Diederich, J. W. Hutchinson, S. MacEachern, S. Ruan, and J. Townsend, "Sequential sampling models of choice: Some recent advances," Marketing Letters, vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 255-267, 2008
8. R. M. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer, and J. T. Townsend, "Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making," Psychological Review, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 370-392, 2001
9. K. Train, Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009
10. M. Usher and J. L. McClelland, "Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice," Psychological Review, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 757-769, 2004
11. N. Arora and J. Huber, "Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 273-283, 2001
12. T. Evgeniou, C. Boussios, and G. Zacharia, "Generalized robust conjoint estimation," Marketing Science, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 415-429, 2005
13. O. Toubia, J. R. Hauser, and D. I. Simester, "Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 116-131, 2004
14. Y. Zhang and D.-Y. Yeung, "A convex formulation for learning task relationships in multi-task learning," in Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2010, pp. 733-742
15. C. M. Bishop, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006
16. A. Gelman, J. Carlin, H. Stern, and D. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, 1995
17. D. Ariely, Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions, revised and expanded ed. Harper Perennial, 2010.