Antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of three-dimensional nanostructured porous granules of hydroxyapatite and zinc oxide nanoparticles - An in vitro and in vivo study

Nanotechnology

Volumn 26, Issue 31, 2015, Pages

  Grenho, L ^a,b,c   Salgado, C L ^a,b,c   Fernandes, M H ^d   Monteiro, F J ^a,b,c   Ferraz, M P ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^c INEB INSTITUTO DE ENGENHARIA BIOMÉDICA   (Portugal)

^d U Porto   (Portugal)

^e UNIVERSIDADE FERNANDO PESSOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

antibacterial activity; biocompatibility; nanostructured hydroxyapatite; porous granules; zinc oxide nanoparticles

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CELL CULTURE; COLLAGEN; GRANULATION; HYDROXYAPATITE; II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM; NANOPARTICLES; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE; ZINC OXIDE;

ANTI-BACTERIAL ACTIVITY; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; FLOW CYTOMETRY ANALYSIS; NANOSTRUCTURED HYDROXYAPATITE; OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; POROUS GRANULES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS;

ZNO NANOPARTICLES;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BIOMATERIAL; HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOPARTICLE; ZINC OXIDE;

ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; NANOPORE; OSTEOBLAST; POROSITY; RAT; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION; ULTRASTRUCTURE; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL LINE; DURAPATITE; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MALE; NANOPARTICLES; NANOPORES; OSTEOBLASTS; POROSITY; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 84937786838     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/31/315101     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Teixeira S, Ferraz M P and Monteiro F J 2008 Biocompatibility of highly macroporous ceramic scaffolds: cell adhesion and morphology studies J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19 855-9
2. Tripathi G and Basu B 2012 A porous hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering: physico-mechanical and biological evaluations Ceram. Int. 38 341-9
3. Bernhardt A, Dittrich R, Lode A, Despang F and Gelinsky M 2013 Nanocrystalline spherical hydroxyapatite granules for bone repair: in vitro evaluation with osteoblast-like cells and osteoclasts J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 24 1755-66
4. Ferraz M P, Monteiro F J and Manuel C M 2004 Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: a review of preparation methodologies J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. 2 74-80
5. Fox K, Tran P A and Tran N 2012 Recent advances in research applications of nanophase hydroxyapatite Chem. Phys. Chem. 13 2495-506
6. Zimmerli W and Sendi P 2011 Pathogenesis of implant-associated infection: the role of the host Seminars Immunopathol. 33 295-306
7. Riool M et al 2014 Staphylococcus epidermidis originating from titanium implants infects surrounding tissue and immune cells Acta Biomater. 10 5202-12
8. Campoccia D, Montanaro L and Arciola C R 2013 A review of the biomaterials technologies for infection-resistant surfaces Biomaterials 34 8533-4
9. Francolini I and Donelli G 2010 Prevention and control of biofilm-based medical-device-related infections FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 59 227-38
10. Dutta R K, Nenavathu B P, Gangishetty M K and Reddy A V 2012 Studies on antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticles by ROS induced lipid peroxidation Colloids Surf. B 94 143-50
11. Fang M, Chen J H, Xu X L, Yang P H and Hildebrand H F 2006 Antibacterial activities of inorganic agents on six bacteria associated with oral infections by two susceptibility tests Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 27 513-7
12. Padmavathy N and Vijayaraghavan R 2008 Enhanced bioactivity of ZnO nanoparticles: an antimicrobial study Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 9 035004
13. Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit K T and Manna A C 2008 Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 279 71-6
14. Nair S et al 2009 Role of size scale of ZnO nanoparticles and microparticles on toxicity toward bacteria and osteoblast cancer cells J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 20 S235-41 (Suppl. 1)
15. Raghupathi K R, Koodali R T and Manna A C 2011 Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles Langmuir 27 4020-8
16. Grenho L, Monteiro F J and Pia Ferraz M 2014 In vitro analysis of the antibacterial effect of nanohydroxyapatite-ZnO composites J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 102 3726-33
17. Arciola C R, An Y, Campoccia D, Donati M E and Montanaro L 2005 Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates Int. J. Artif. Organs 28 1091-100
18. Laranjeira M S, Fernandes M H and Monteiro F J 2010 Innovative macroporous granules of nanostructured-hydroxyapatite agglomerates: bioactivity and osteoblast-like cell behaviour J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 95891-900
19. Gervaso F, Scalera F, Kunjalukkal Padmanabhan S, Sannino A and Licciulli A 2012 High-performance hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 9 507-16
20. Barros J et al 2014 Influence of nanohydroxyapatite surface properties on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation J. Biomater. Appl. 28 1325-35
21. Porter J R, Ruckh T T and Popat K C 2009 Bone tissue engineering: a review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies Biotechnol. Prog. 25 1539-60
22. Romanò C L, Toscano M, Romanò D and Drago L 2013 Antibiofilm agents and implant-related infections in orthopaedics: where are we? J. Chemother. 25 67-80
23. Premanathan M, Karthikeyan K, Jeyasubramanian K and Manivannan G 2011 Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward Gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 7 184-92
24. Tran P A and Webster T J 2011 Selenium nanoparticles inhibit Staphylococcus aureus growth Int. J. Nanomed. 6 1553-8
25. Hanley C, Thurber A, Hanna C, Punnoose A, Zhang J and Wingett D G 2009 The influences of cell type and ZnO nanoparticle size on immune cell cytotoxicity and cytokine induction Nanoscale Res. Lett. 4 1409-20
26. Geilich B M and Webster T J 2013 Reduced adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to ZnO/PVC nanocomposites Int. J. Nanomed. 8 1177-84
27. Seil J T and Webster T J 2011 Reduced Staphylococcus aureus proliferation and biofilm formation on zinc oxide nanoparticle PVC composite surfaces Acta Biomater. 7 2579-84
28. Zhang L L et al 2010 Mechanistic investigation into antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles against E. Coli J. Nanopart. Res. 12 1625-36
29. Polo-Corrales L, Latorre-Esteves M and Ramirez-Vick J E 2014 Scaffold design for bone regeneration J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14 15-56
30. Webster T J, Siegel R W and Bizios R 1999 Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics Biomaterials 20 1221-7
31. Webster T J, Ergun C, Doremus R H, Siegel R W and Bizios R 2000 Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 51 475-83
32. Suárez-Franco J L et al 2013 Effects of surface morphology of ZnAl 2 O 4 ceramic materials on osteoblastic cells responses J. Nanomater. 2013 2
33. Ribeiro N, Sousa S and Monteiro F 2010 Influence of crystallite size of nanophased hydroxyapatite on fibronectin and osteonectin adsorption and on MC3T3-E1 osteoblast adhesion and morphology J. Colloid Interface Sci. 351 398-406
34. Guo X, Gough J E, Xiao P, Liu J and Shen Z 2007 Fabrication of nanostructured hydroxyapatite and analysis of human osteoblastic cellular response J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 82 1022-32
35. Lee H R et al 2013 Comparative characteristics of porous bioceramics for an osteogenic response in vitro and in vivo PLoS One 8 e84272
36. Sena L A, Caraballo M M, Rossi A M and Soares G A 2009 Synthesis and characterization of biocomposites with different hydroxyapatite-collagen ratios J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 20 2395-400
37. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L and Li N 2006 Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel Science 311 622-7
38. Maschhoff P M, Geilich B M and Webster T J 2014 Greater fibroblast proliferation on an ultrasonicated ZnO/PVC nanocomposite material Int. J. Nanomed. 9 257-63
39. Taccola L et al 2011 Zinc oxide nanoparticles as selective killers of proliferating cells Int. J. Nanomed. 6
40. Akhtar M J, Ahamed M, Kumar S, Khan M A M, Ahmad J and Alrokayan S A 2012 Zinc oxide nanoparticles selectively induce apoptosis in human cancer cells through reactive oxygen species Int. J. Nanomed. 7 845-57
41. Premanathan M, Karthikeyan K, Jeyasubramanian K and Manivannan G 2011 Selective toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles toward Gram-positive bacteria and cancer cells by apoptosis through lipid peroxidation Nanomedicine 7 184-92
42. Xia T et al 2006 Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm Nano Lett. 6 1794-807
43. Sharma V, Anderson D and Dhawan A 2012 Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative DNA damage and ROS-triggered mitochondria mediated apoptosis in human liver cells (HepG2) Apoptosis 17 852-70
44. Applerot G et al 2009 Enhanced antibacterial activity of nanocrystalline ZnO due to increased ROS-mediated cell injury Adv. Funct. Mater. 19 842-52
45. Ribeiro M, Monteiro F J and Ferraz M P 2012 Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions Biomatter 2 176-94
46. Ninan N et al 2014 Antibacterial and wound healing analysis of gelatin/zeolite scaffolds Colloids Surf. B 115 244-52
47. McCarthy T J, Zeelie J J and Krause D J 1992 The antimicrobial action of zinc ion/antioxidant combinations J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 17 51-4
48. Zeelie J J and McCarthy T J 1998 Effects of copper and zinc ions on the germicidal properties of two popular pharmaceutical antiseptic agents cetylpyridinium chloride and povidone-iodine Analyst 123 503-7
49. Tommila M et al 2008 Bioactive glass-derived hydroxyapatite-coating promotes granulation tissue growth in subcutaneous cellulose implants in rats Acta Biomater. 4 354-61
50. Yokoyama A et al 2005 Biomimetic porous scaffolds with high elasticity made from mineralized collagen - an animal study J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 75 464-72
51. Campoccia D, Montanaro L and Arciola C R 2006 The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance Biomaterials 27 2331-9
52. Zimmerli W 2014 Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection J. Intern. Med. 276 111-9