Variation in predictive ability of common genetic variants by established strata the example of breast cancer and age

Epidemiology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 51-58

  Aschard, Hugues ^a   Zaitlen, Noah ^b   Lindström, Sara ^a   Kraft, Peter ^a  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC RISK; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VERY ELDERLY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MIDDLE AGED; RISK; RISK FACTOR;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84937571216     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: 15315487     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000195     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A schard H, Lutz S, Maus B, et al. Challenges and opportunities in genome-wide environmental interaction (GWEI) studies. Hum Genet. 2012;131:1591-1613.
2. A schard H, Chen J, Cornelis MC, Chibnik LB, Karlson EW, Kraft P. Inclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions unlikely to dramatically improve risk prediction for complex diseases. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90:962-972.
3. Qi Q, Chu AY, Kang JH, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and genetic risk of obesity. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1387-1396.
4. C ornelis MC, Qi L, Zhang C, et al. Joint effects of common genetic variants on the risk for type 2 diabetes in U.S. men and women of European ancestry. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:541-550.
5. Hösing A, Canzian F, Beckmann L, et al; BPC3. Prediction of breast cancer risk by genetic risk factors, overall and by hormone receptor status. J Med Genet. 2012;49:601-608.
6. L indström S, Schumacher FR, Cox D, et al. Common genetic variants in prostate cancer risk prediction-results from the NCI Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:437-444.
7. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:870-874.
8. Kerr KF, Pepe MS. Joint modeling, covariate adjustment, and interaction: contrasting notions in risk prediction models and risk prediction performance. Epidemiology. 2011;22:805-812.
9. Zaitlen N, Lindström S, Pasaniuc B, et al. Informed conditioning on clinical covariates increases power in case-control association studies. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003032.
10. N emes S, Jonasson JM, Genell A, Steineck G. Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:56.
11. Wacholder S, Hartge P, Prentice R, et al. Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:986-993.
12. G arcia-Closas M, Couch FJ, Lindstrom S, et al; Gene ENvironmental Interaction and breast CAncer (GENICA) Network; kConFab Investigators; Familial Breast Cancer Study (FBCS); Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB) Investigators. Genome-wide association studies identify four ER negative-specific breast cancer risk loci. Nat Genet. 2013;45:392-398, 398e1-2.
13. G reenland S. Interactions in epidemiology: relevance, identification, and estimation. Epidemiology. 2009;20:14-17.
14. T hompson WD. Effect modification and the limits of biological inference from epidemiologic data. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:221-232.
15. Bhattacharjee S, Wang Z, Ciampa J, et al. Using principal components of genetic variation for robust and powerful detection of gene-gene interactions in case-control and case-only studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:331-342.
16. Siemiatycki J, Thomas DC. Biological models and statistical interactions: An example from multistage carcinogenesis. Int J Epidemiol. 1981;10:383-387.
17. I nternational HapMap C. The International HapMap Project. Nature. 2003;426:789-796.
18. Mealiffe ME, Stokowski RP, Rhees BK, Prentice RL, Pettinger M, Hinds DA. Assessment of clinical validity of a breast cancer risk model combining genetic and clinical information. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1618-1627.
19. G ail MH. Discriminatory accuracy from single-nucleotide polymorphisms in models to predict breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1037-1041.