Patient-Specific Factors Associated with Dissatisfaction after Elective Surgery for Degenerative Spine Diseases

Neurosurgery

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 157-163

  Chotai, Silky ^a   Sivaganesan, Ahilan ^a   Parker, Scott L ^a   McGirt, Matthew J ^b   Devin, Clinton J ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Department of Neurological Surgery ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical; Dissatisfaction; Lumbar; Patient satisfaction; Predictors; Spine surgery

Indexed keywords

OPIATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARM PAIN; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BACKACHE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE SPINE DISEASE; ELECTIVE SPINE SURGERY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LEG PAIN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NECK PAIN; NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE; NUMERICAL RATING SCALE FOR BACK PAIN AND NECK PAIN; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADICULOPATHY; RATING SCALE; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CERVICAL SPINE; DISABILITY; FOLLOW UP; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MEDICALLY UNINSURED; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSURGERY; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROCEDURES; SOCIOECONOMICS; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MEDICAID; MEDICALLY UNINSURED; MIDDLE AGED; NECK PAIN; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84937423678     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: 15244040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000768     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405-411.
2. Larkin DJ, Swanson RC, Fuller S, Cortese DA. The Affordable Care Act: a case study for understanding and applying complexity concepts to health care reform [published online ahead of print November 4, 2014]. J Eval Clin Pract. doi: 10. 1111/jep.12271. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep. 12271/abstract.
3. Edwards ST, Bitton A, Hong J, Landon BE. Patient-centered medical home initiatives expanded in 2009-13: providers, patients, and payment incentives increased. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014; 33(10): 1823-1831.
4. Farley H, Enguidanos ER, Coletti CM, et al. Patient satisfaction surveys and quality of care: an information paper. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(4):351-357.
5. Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009;146 (3):435-443.
6. Bederman SS. Commentary: patient satisfaction in spinal surgery: should we be addressing customer service or health improvement? Spine J. 2013;13(5):507-509.
7. Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;34(2):169-178.
8. Piper LE. Patients are not always rational: the leadership challenge to improve patient satisfaction scores. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2010;29(3): 233-240.
9. Rönnberg K, Lind B, Zoëga B, Halldin K, Gellerstedt M, Brisby H. Patients' satisfaction with provided care/information and expectations on clinical outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(2):256-261.
10. Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis patients are satisfied with short-term results of surgery: younger age, symptom severity, disability and depression decrease satisfaction. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(7):537-544.
11. Mancuso CA, Cammisa FP, Sama AA, Hughes AP, Ghomrawi HM, Girardi FP. Development and testing of an expectations survey for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(19):1793-1800.
12. McGregor AH, Doré CJ, Morris TP. An exploration of patients' expectation of and satisfaction with surgical outcome. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(12):2836-2844.
13. Fujimori T, Iwasaki M, Okuda S, et al. Patient satisfaction with surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14(6):726-733.
14. Harris IA, Dao AT, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Jalaludin BB. Predictors of patient and surgeon satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2009;40(4):377-384.
15. Hessler C, Boysen K, Regelsberger J, Vettorazzi E, Winkler D, Westphal M. Patient satisfaction after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is primarily driven by relieving pain. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(5):398-403.
16. Kimura A, Endo T, Inoue H, Seichi A. Preoperative predictors of patient satisfaction with outcome after cervical laminoplasty. Global Spine J. 2014;4(2):77-82.
17. O'Toole RV, Castillo RC, Pollak AN, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ. LEAP Study Group. Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(6):1206-1211.
18. Godil SS, Parker SL, Zuckerman SL, et al. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy. Spine J. 2013;13(9):1006-1012.
19. Burroughs TE, Cira JC, Chartock P, Davies AR, Dunagan WC. Using root cause analysis to address patient satisfaction and other improvement opportunities. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000;26(8):439-449.
20. Zusman EE. HCAHPS replaces Press Ganey survey as quality measure for patient hospital experience. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):N21-N24.
21. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409-415.
22. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(22):2940-2952; discussion 2952.
23. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
24. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-233.
25. Langley GB, Sheppeard H. The Visual Analogue Scale: its use in pain measurement. Rheumatol Int. 1985;5(4):145-148.
26. Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63-70.
27. Main CJ. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ). J Psychosom Res. 1983;27(6):503-514.
28. Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH. The North American Spine Society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(6):741-749.
29. Esselman PC, White BF, Chimes GP, Kennedy DJ. Patient satisfaction surveys: tools to enhance patient care or flawed outcome measures? PM R. 2013;5(12): 1069-1076.
30. Parker SL, Adogwa O, Paul AR, et al. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14(5):598-604.
31. Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(2):154-160.
32. Skolasky RL, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Riley LH, 3rd. Patient satisfaction in the cervical spine research society outcomes study: relationship to improved clinical outcome. Spine J. 2009;9(3):232-239.
33. Cohen JW. Medicaid policy and the substitution of hospital outpatient care for physician care. Health Serv Res. 1989;24(1):33-66.
34. LaPar DJ, Bhamidipati CM, Mery CM, et al. Primary payer status affects mortality for major surgical operations. Ann Surg. 2010;252(3):544-550; discussion 550-541.
35. Rosen H, Saleh F, Lipsitz SR, Meara JG, Rogers SO Jr. Lack of insurance negatively affects trauma mortality in US children. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(10):1952-1957.
36. Manoso MW, Cizik AM, Bransford RJ, Bellabarba C, Chapman J, Lee MJ. Medicaid status is associated with higher surgical site infection rates after spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(20):1707-1713.
37. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, et al. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery. Spine J. 2013;13(5):501-506.
38. Adogwa O, Verla T, Thompson P, et al. Affective disorders influence clinical outcomes after revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic adjacent-segment disease, recurrent stenosis, or pseudarthrosis: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(2):153-159.
39. Hoff RA, Rosenheck RA, Meterko M, Wilson NJ. Mental illness as a predictor of satisfaction with inpatient care at Veterans Affairs hospitals. Psychiatr Serv. 1999; 50(5):680-685.
40. Pakarinen M, Vanhanen S, Sinikallio S, et al. Depressive burden is associated with a poorer surgical outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a 5-year followup study. Spine J. 2014;14(10):2392-2396.
41. Barrick WT, Schofferman JA, Reynolds JB, et al. Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(7):853-857.
42. Blount KJ, Krompinger WJ,Maljanian R, Browner BD. Moving toward a standard for spinal fusion outcomes assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002;15(1):16-23.
43. NQF endorses HCAHPS patient perception survey. Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2005;12(7):82-83.