Giving samples or "getting checked": measuring conflation of observational biospecimen research and clinical care in Latino communities Ethics in Biomedical Research

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Knerr, Sarah ^a,b   Ceballos, Rachel M ^a,b  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Biospecimen donation; Diagnostic misconception; Hispanic Latino; Measure construction; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOBANK; COMPREHENSION; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHICS; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARDS; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; TRUST; VALIDATION STUDY; WASHINGTON; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPREHENSION; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; ETHICS, RESEARCH; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; TRUST; WASHINGTON; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937158851     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0041-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Halverson MA, Ross LF. Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research. Genet Med. 2012;14(6):611-5.
2. Nobile H, Vermeulen E, Thys K, Bergmann MM, Borry P. Why do participants enroll in population biobank studies? Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012;13(1):35-47.
3. Clayton EW, Ross LF. Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA. 2006;295(1):37-8.
4. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psych. 1982;5(3-4):319-29.
5. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care. 2002;40(9 Suppl):V55-63.
6. Ceballos R, Knerr S, Scott MA, Hohl SD, Malen RC, Vilchis H, et al. Latino beliefs about biomedical research participation: a qualitative study on the US-Mexico border. J Empir Res Hum Res. 2014;9:10-21.
7. Beskow LM, Dombeck CB, Thomspon CP, Watson-Ormond JK, Weinfurt KP. Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension. Genet Med. 2015;17(3):226-33.
8. Ortega AN, Fang H, Perez VH, Rizzo JA, Carter-Pokras O, Wallace SP, et al. Health care access, use of services, and experiences among undocumented Mexicans and other Latinos. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(21):2354-60.
9. Fullerton S.M. The input-output problem: whose DNA do we study, and why does it matter? 2011 W. Burke K.A. Edwards S. Goering S. Holland S.B. Trinidad (eds).
10. Thompson B, Hebert JR. Involving disparate populations in clinical trials and biobanking protocols: experiences form the Community Network Program Centers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(3):370-3.
11. Hohl SD, Gonzalez C, Carosso E, Ibarra G, Thompson B. "I did it for us and I would do it again": perspectives of rural Latinos on providing biospecimens for research. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(5):911-6.
12. Lopez DS, Fernandez ME, Cano MA, Mendez C, Tsai CL, Wetter DW, et al. Association of acculturation, nativity, and years living in the United States with biobanking among individuals of Mexican descent. Cancer Epidemol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(3):402-8.
13. Appelbaum PS, Anatchkova M, Albert K, Dunn LB, Lidz CW. Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measure. Clin Trials. 2012;9(6):748-61.
14. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75. Naval Air Station Memphis: Chief of Naval Technical Training; 1975.
15. Nápoles-Springer AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, O'Brien H, Stewart AL. Using cognitive interviews to develop surveys in diverse populations. Med Care. 2006;44(11 Suppl 3):S21-30.
16. Hill TG, Briant KJ, Bowen D, Boerner V, Vu T, Lopez K, et al. Evaluation of Cancer 101: an educational program for native settings. J Canc Educ. 2010;25(3):329-36.
17. Furr LA, Kelly SE. The Genetic Knowledge Index: developing a standard measure of genetic knowledge. Genet Test. 1999;3(2):193-9.
18. Hall MA, Camacho F, Lawlor JS, DePuy V, Sugarman J, Weinfurt K. Measuring trust in medical researchers. Med Care. 2006;44(11):1048-53.
19. Ashida S, Goodman M, Pandya C, Koehly LM, Lachance C, Stafford J, et al. Age differences in genetic knowledge, health literacy and causal beliefs for health conditions. Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(4-5):307-16.
20. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34-42.
21. U.S. Census Bureau; generated by Sarah Knerr using American FactFinder. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community-facts.xhtml. Accessed 4 December 2014.
22. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX:StataCorp LP; 2012
23. Comfry AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(5):754-61.
24. Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC. Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Underst Stat. 2003;2(1):13-43.
25. de Vet HCW, Ader HJ, Terwee C, Pouwer F. Are factor analytic techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analyses of the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(5):1203-18.
26. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Pearson: Saddle River, NJ; 2013.
27. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1(2):245-76.
28. Steiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(1):99-103.
29. U.S. Census Bureau, 2012. U.S. Census Bureau projections show a slower growing, older, more diverse nation a half century from now. Available at: http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-243.html. Accessed 4 December 2014.
30. Bustamante CD, Burchard EG, De La Vega FM. Genomics for the world. Nature. 2011;475(7355):163-5.
31. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), 2013. Monitoring of adherence to the NIH policy on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. Fiscal Year 2011-2012. Available at: http://orwh.od.nih.gov/research/inclusion/reports.asp. Accessed 4 December 2014
32. Rodriguez EM, Torres ET, Erwin DO. Awareness and interest in biospecimen donation for cancer research: views from gatekeepers and prospective participants in the Latino community. J Community Genet. 2013;4(4):461-8.
33. Sanderson SC, Difenbach MA, Zinberg R, Horozitz CR, Smirnoff M, Zweig M, et al. Willingness to participate in genomics research and desire for personal results among underrepresented minority patients: a structured interview study. J Community Genet. 2012;4(4):469-82.
34. Kirkland SA, Raina PS, Woflson C, Strople G, Kits O, Dukeshire S, et al. Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of conducting a large longitudinal population-based study in Canada. Can J Aging. 2009;28(3):231-42.
35. Townsend A, Cox SM. Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada. BMC Med Ethics. 2012;14:40.
36. Wells KJ, Arevalo M, Mead CD, Gwede CK, Quinn GP, Luque JS, et al. Development and validation of the biobanking attitudes and knowledge scale (BANKS). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(3):374-83.
37. Fisher JA, Kalbaugh CA. Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(12):2217-22.