Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 611-615

  Halverson, Colin M E ^a   Ross, Lainie Friedman ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

biobank; deliberative engagement; return of results; therapeutic misconception; trust

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; BIOBANK; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; TRUST;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; ATTITUDE; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; TRUST;

EID: 84861848446     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.50     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 1982;5:319-329.
2. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 1987;17:20-24.
3. Dresser R. The ubiquity and utility of the therapeutic misconception. Soc Philos Policy 2002;19:271-294.
4. Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care 2002;40(9 Suppl):V55-V63.
5. Appelbaum PS. Clarifying the ethics of clinical research: a path toward avoiding the therapeutic misconception. Am J Bioeth 2002;2:22-23.
6. Fried E. The therapeutic misconception, beneficence, and respect. Account Res 2001;8:331-348.
7. Joffe S, Weeks JC. Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1847-1853. (Pubitemid 36104629)
8. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA. Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:188-198.
9. Lakes KD, Vaughan E, Jones M, Burke W, Baker D, Swanson JM. Diverse perceptions of the informed consent process: implications for the recruitment and participation of diverse communities in the National Children's Study. Am J Community Psychol 2011; e-pub ahead of print 14 June 2011.
10. Nuremberg Code. Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1949:181-182.
11. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects Research. US Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1979. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html. Accessed 28 July 2011.
12. Fishkin JS. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009.
13. Gutmann A, Thompson DF. Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1996.
14. Gutmann A. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, 2004.
15. Lemke AA, Halverson CME, Ross LF. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet, in press.
16. Katz J. The Silent World of Doctor and Patient. Free Press: New York, 1984.
17. Charuvastra A, Marder SR. Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception. J Med Ethics 2008;34:193-197.
18. de Melo-Martín I, Ho A. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust. J Med Ethics 2008;34:202-205.
19. Sankar P. Communication and miscommunication in informed consent to research. Med Anthropol Q 2004;18:429-446. (Pubitemid 41277778)
20. Clayton EW, Ross LF. Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA 2006;295:37; author reply 37-37; author reply 38.
21. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:8-17. (Pubitemid 44691474)
22. Shalowitz DI, Miller FG. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLoS Med 2008;5:e91.
23. Meulenkamp TM, Gevers SK, Bovenberg JA, Koppelman GH, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Smets EM. Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want? Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A:2482-2492.
24. Fernandez CV, Santor D, Weijer C, et al. The return of research results to participants: pilot questionnaire of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;48:441-446. (Pubitemid 46340111)
25. Fernandez CV, Weijer C. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results. Am J Bioeth 2006;6:44-6; author reply W10.