Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: Development and validation of a measure

Clinical Trials

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 748-761

  Appelbaum, Paul S ^a   Anatchkova, Milena ^b   Albert, Karen ^b   Dunn, Laura B ^c   Lidz, Charles W ^b  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SELF EVALUATION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; ROC CURVE; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871843982     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: 17407753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1740774512456455     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987 ; 17 (2). 20-24
2. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB. 2004 2004 ; 26 26 (2 5). 1 18-8
3. Henderson GE, Churchill CR, Davis AM, et al. Clinical trials and medical care: Defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Med. 2007 ; 4: 1735-38 (Pubitemid 350220527)
4. Appelbaum PS, Lidz C The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Emanuel EJ Grady C Crouch RA, ed. New York: Oxford University Press ; 2008: 633-44.
5. Henderson GE, Easter MM, Zimmer C, et al. Therapeutic misconception in early phase gene transfer trials. Soc Sci Med. 2006 ; 62: 239-53 (Pubitemid 41728121)
6. Horng S, Grady C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: Distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. IRB. 2003 ; 25 (1). 11-16 (Pubitemid 41585063)
7. Miller FG, Joffe S. Evaluating the therapeutic misconception. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 ; 16: 353-66
8. Sreenivasan G. Does informed consent to research require comprehension?. Lancet. 2003 ; 362: 2016-18 (Pubitemid 37548430)
9. Kimmelman J. The therapeutic misconception at 25: Treatment, research and confusion. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 ; 37 (6). 36-42
10. Dunn LB, Palmer BW, Keehan M, Jeste DV, Appelbaum PS. Assessment of therapeutic misconception in older schizophrenia patients using a brief instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 ; 163: 500-06 (Pubitemid 44469394)
11. WazaifyMKhalilSSSilvermanHJ. Expression of therapeutic misconception amongst Egyptians: A qualitative pilot study. BMC Med Ethics2009; 10(7). Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/10/7 (accessed 18 August 2011).
12. Durand-ZaleskiISAlbertiCDurieuxPet al. Informed consent in clinical research in France: Assessment and factors associated with therapeutic misconception. J Med Ethics2008; 34(9): e16. Available at: http://jme.bmj.com/ content/34/9/e16.full.pdf (accessed 18 August 2011).
13. Joffe S, Cook EF, Clearly PD, Clark JW, Weeks J. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001 ; 358: 1772-77 (Pubitemid 33153003)
14. Snowdon C, Garcia J, Elbourne D. Making sense of randomization: Responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Soc Sci Med. 1997 ; 45: 1337-55 (Pubitemid 27445491)
15. Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press ; 1996:
16. Hereu P, Perez E, Fuentes I. Consent in clinical trials: What do patients know?. et al Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 ; 31: 443-46
17. Jansen L, Appelbaum PS, Klein W. Unrealistic optimism in early phase oncology trials. et al IRB. 2011 ; 33 (1). 1-8
18. Goldberg DS. Eschewing definitions of the therapeutic misconception: A family resemblance analysis. J Med Philos. 2011 ; 36: 296-320
19. Kim SYH, Schrock L, Wilson RM. An approach to evaluating the therapeutic misconception. et al IRB. 2009 ; 31 (5). 7-14
20. Dawson A Engaging the World: The Use of Empirical Research in Bioethics and the Regulation of Biotechnology. Holm S Jonas M, ed. Amsterdam: IOS Press ; 2004: 41-52.
21. Embretson SE, Reise SP Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. ; 2000:
22. Muthen LK, Muthen BO Mplus User's Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen ; 1998-2004.
23. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999 ; 6 (1). 1-55
24. Steiger JH, Lind J. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society ; Iowa City, IA ;..
25. Chen F, Curran PJ, Bollen KA, Kirby J, Paxton P. An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res. 2008 ; 36 (4). 462-94
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997 ; 314: 572
27. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med. 2000 ; 45 (1-2). 23-41 (Pubitemid 30308338)
28. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950 ; 3 (1). 32-35
29. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994 ; 308 (6943). 1552 (Pubitemid 24178459)
30. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994 ; 309 (6947). 102 (Pubitemid 24216428)
31. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic plots. BMJ. 1994 ; 309 (6948). 188 (Pubitemid 24216486)
32. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 ; 16 (9). 606-13
33. Cameron IM, Cardy A, Crawford JR. Measuring depression severity in general practice: Discriminatory performance of the PHQ-9, HADS-D, and BDI-II. et al Br J Gen Pract. 2011 ; 61 (588). e419-26
34. Asadi-Lari M, Packham C, Gray D. Is quality of life measurement likely to be a proxy for health needs assessment in patients with coronary artery disease?. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 ; 1 (1). 50
35. Smith S, Trinder J. Detecting insomnia: Comparison of four self-report measures of sleep in a young adult population. J Sleep Res. 2001 ; 10 (3). 229-35
36. Hedayati SS, Bosworth HB, Kuchibhatla M, Kimmel PL, Szczech LA. The predictive value of self-report scales compared with physician diagnosis of depression in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006 ; 69 (9). 1662-68
37. Leeflang MM, Moons KG, Reitsma JB, Zwinderman AH. Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: Mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. Clin Chem. 2008 ; 54 (4). 729-37
38. McNeill D, Freiberger P Fuzzy Logic: The Revolutionary Computer Technology That Is Changing Our World. New York: Simon and Schuster ; 1994:
39. Dunn LB, Nowrangi MA, Palmer BW, Jeste DV, Saks ER. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 ; 163 (8). 1323-34