Evaluation of Data Aggregation in Polarized Sensory Positioning

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 46-55

  Antúnez, Lucía ^a   Salvador, Ana ^b   de Saldamando, Luis ^a   Varela, Paula ^c   Giménez, Ana ^a   Ares, Gastón ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b INSTITUTO DE AGROQUÍMICA Y TECNOLOGÍA DE ALIMENTOS CSIC   (Spain)

^c NOFIMA   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEVERAGES; SAMPLING;

CONSUMER STUDIES; DATA AGGREGATION; MILK BEVERAGES; PRODUCT CATEGORIES; SAMPLE SETS; SENSORY CHARACTERIZATION; SPLIT-SAMPLE;

PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION;

EID: 84923075973     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/joss.12135     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abdi, H., Valentin, D., Chollet, S. and Chrea, C. 2007. Analyzing assessors and products in sorting studies: DISTATIS, theory and applications. Food Qual. Prefer. 18, 627-640.
2. Ares, G. and Varela, P. 2014. Comparison of novel methodologies for sensory characterization. In Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling (P. Varela and G. Ares, eds.) pp. 365-389, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
3. Ares, G., Giménez, A. and Bruzzone, F. 2011. Is a consumer panel able to reliably evaluate the texture of dairy desserts using unstructured intensity scales? Evaluation of global and individual performance. J. Sensory Studies 26, 363-370.
4. Ares, G., de Saldamando, L., Vidal, L., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A. and Varela, P. 2013. Polarized projective mapping: Comparison with Polarized Sensory Positioning approaches. Food Qual. Prefer. 28, 510-518.
5. Chollet, S. and Valentin, D. 2001. Impact of training on beer flavour perception and description: Are trained and untrained subjects really different. J. Sensory Studies 16, 601-618.
6. Chollet, S., Lelièvre, M., Abdi, H. and Valentin, D. 2011. Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask. Food Qual. Prefer. 22, 507-520.
7. de Saldamando, L., Delgado, J., Herencia, P., Giménez, A. and Ares, G. 2013. Polarized sensory positioning: Do conclusions depend on the poles? Food Qual. Prefer. 29, 25-32.
8. Dehlholm, C., Brockhoff, P.B., Mejnert, L., Aaslyng, M.D. and Bredie, W.L.P. 2012. Rapid descriptive sensory methods - comparison of free multiple sorting, partial napping, napping, flash profiling and conventional profiling. Food Qual. Prefer. 26, 267-277.
9. Faye, P., Brémaud, D., Durand-Daubin, D., Courcoux, P., Giboreau, A. and Nicod, A. 2004. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: An alternative to descriptive mappings. Food Qual. Prefer. 15, 781-791.
10. Hopfer, H. and Heymann, H. 2013. A summary of projective mapping observations - The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements. Food Qual. Prefer. 28, 164-181.
11. ISO. 2007. Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, ISO Standard 8589. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve.
12. Josse, J., Pagés, J. and Husson, F. 2008. Testing the significance of the RV coefficient. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, 82-91.
13. Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. 2010. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices, 2nd Ed., Springer, New York, NY.
14. Lelièvre, M., Chollet, S., Abdi, H. and Valentin, D. 2008. What is the validity of the sorting study for describing beers? A study using trained and untrained assessors. Food Qual. Prefer. 19, 697-703.
15. Lê, S., Josse, J. and Husson, F. 2008. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 25, 1-18.
16. MacRae, A.W., Howgate, P. and Geelhoed, E.N. 1990. Assessing the similarity of odours by sorting and by triadic comparison. Chem. Senses 15, 661-699.
17. Meilgaard, M.C., Civille, G.V. and Carr, B.T. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
18. Murray, J.M., Delahunty, C.M. and Baxter, I.A. 2001. Descriptive sensory analysis: Past, present and future. Food Res. Int. 34, 461-471.
19. R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
20. Risvik, E., McEwan, J.A. and Rodbotten, M. 1997. Evaluation of sensory profiling and projective mapping data. Food Qual. Prefer. 8, 63-71.
21. Robert, P. and Escoufier, Y. 1976. A unifying tool for linear multivariate statistical methods: The RV coefficient. Appl. Stat. 25, 257-265.
22. Stone, H., Sidel, J.L., Oliver, S., Woolsey, A. and Singleton, R.C. 1974. Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Technol. 28, 24-33.
23. Teillet, E. 2014. Polarized Sensory Positioning methodologies. In Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling (P. Varela and G. Ares, eds.) pp. 255-269, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
24. Teillet, E., Schlich, P., Urbano, C., Cordelle, S. and Guichard, E. 2010. Sensory methodologies and the taste of water. Food Qual. Prefer. 21, 967-976.
25. Valentin, D., Chollet, S., Lelievre, M. and Abdi, H. 2012. Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47, 1563-1578.
26. Varela, P. and Ares, G. 2012. Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization. Food Res. Int. 48, 893-908.