Framing pictorial cigarette warning labels to motivate young smokers to quit

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 769-775

  Mays, Darren ^a   Turner, Monique M ^b   Zhao, Xiaoquan ^c   Douglas Evans, W ^b   Luta, George ^a   Tercyak, Kenneth P ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SMOKING CESSATION; SOCIAL MARKETING; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; PACKAGING; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZATION; SMOKING; STANDARDS; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PRODUCT LABELING; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SELF EFFICACY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84937040089     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu164     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. U.S.Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
2. Henriksen L. Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place. Tob Control. 2012;21:147-153.
3. Hammond D. Tobacco packaging and labeling policies under the U.S. Tobacco Control Act: research needs and priorities. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14:62-74.
4. Husten CG, Deyton LR. Understanding the Tobacco Control Act: efforts by the US Food and Drug Administration to make tobacco-related morbidity and mortality part of the USA's past, not its future. Lancet. 2013;381:1570-1580.
5. Bayer R, Gostin L, Marcus-Toll D. Repackaging cigarettes--will the courts thwart the FDA? N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2065-2067.
6. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453-458. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1685855. Accessed April 1, 2014.
7. Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:101-116.
8. Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull. 1997;121:3-19.
9. Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, Cummings KM. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:674-682.
10. Mays D, Niaura RS, Evans WD, Hammond D, Luta G, Tercyak KP. Cigarette packaging and health warnings: the impact of plain packaging and message framing on young smokers [published online ahead of print January 13, 2014]. Tob Control. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051234.
11. Zhao X, Nan X, Yang B, Iles IA. Cigarette warning labels: graphics, framing, and identity. Health Educ. 2014;114:101-117.
12. Cornacchione J, Smith SW. The effects of message framing within the stages of change on smoking cessation intentions and behaviors. Health Commun. 2012;27:612-622.
13. Fucito LM, Latimer AE, Salovey P, Toll BA. Nicotine dependence as a moderator of message framing effects on smoking cessation outcomes. Ann Behav Med. 2010;39:311-317.
14. Moorman M, van den Putte B. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages. Addict Behav. 2008;33:1267-1275.
15. Witte K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monogr. 1994;61:113-134.
16. Sheeran P, Harris PR, Epton T. Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychol Bull. 2014;140:511-543.
17. Peters GJ, Ruiter RA, Kok G. Threatening communication: a critical reanalysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychol Rev. 2013;7:S8-S31.
18. Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:341-350.
19. Messer K, Trinidad DR, Al-Delaimy WK, Pierce JP. Smoking cessation rates in the United States: a comparison of young adult and older smokers. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:317-322.
20. Ling PM, Glantz SA. Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: evidence from industry documents. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:908-916.
21. Cameron LD, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages [published online ahead of print April 26, 2013]. Tob Control. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050645.
22. Koval JJ, Aubut JA, Pederson LL, O'Hegarty M, Chan SS. The potential effectivenss of warning labels on cigarette packages: the perceptions of young adult Canadians. Can J Public Health. 2005;96:353-356. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/41994587. Accessed April 1, 2014.
23. Villanti AC, Cantrell J, Pearson JL, Vallone DM, Rath JM. Perceptions and perceived impact of graphic cigarette health warning labels on smoking behavior among U.S. young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16:469-477.
24. Berg CJ, Thrasher JF, Westmaas JL, Buchanan T, Pinsker EA, Ahluwalia JS. College student reactions to health warning labels: sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to perceived effectiveness of different approaches. Prev Med. 2011;53:427-430.
25. Hammond D, Reid JL, Driezen P, Boudreau C. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs in the United States: an experimental evaluation of the proposed FDA warnings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:93-102.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61:889-894.
27. Wong NC, Cappella JN. Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. J Appl Commun Res. 2009;37:1-20.
28. Wright AJ, French DP, Weinman J, Marteau TM. Can genetic risk information enhance motivation for smoking cessation? An analogue study. Health Psychol. 2006;25:740-752.
29. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:43-68.
30. Giovino GA, Sidney S, Gfroerer JC, et al. Epidemiology of menthol cigarette use. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6(Suppl 1):S67-S81.
31. Hersey JC, Ng SW, Nonnemaker JM, et al. Are menthol cigarettes a starter product for youth? Nicotine Tob Res. 2006;8:403-413.
32. Delnevo CD, Gunderson DA, Hrywna M, Echeverria SE, Stenberg MB. Smoking cessation prevalence among U.S. smokers of menthol versus nonmehtnol cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41:357-365.
33. Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G, Ford A. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control. 2011;20:367-373.
34. Munafo MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, Leonards U. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction. 2011;106:1505-1510.
35. Strasser AA, Tang KZ, Romer D, Jepson C, Cappella JN. Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:41-47.
36. Falk EB, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD. From neural responses to population behavior: neural focus group predicts population-level media effects. Psychol Sci. 2012;23:439-445.