Cigarette packaging and health warnings: The impact of plain packaging and message framing on young smokers

Tobacco Control

Volumn 24, Issue E1, 2015, Pages e87-e92

  Mays, Darren ^a   Niaura, Raymond S ^a,b,c   Evans, W Douglas ^d   Hammond, David ^e   Luta, George ^a,f   Tercyak, Kenneth P ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^f GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG LABELING; DRUG PACKAGING; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMAN; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; PACKAGING; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO; TOBACCO USE DISORDER; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DRUG LABELING; DRUG PACKAGING; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMANS; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; PRODUCT LABELING; RISK; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOBACCO USE DISORDER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930933897     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051234     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Current cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61:889-94.
2. Henriksen L. Comprehensive tobacco marketing restrictions: promotion, packaging, price and place. Tob Control 2012;21:147-53.
3. Hammond D. Tobacco packaging and labeling policies under the U.S. Tobacco Control Act: research needs and priorities. Nicotine Tob Res 2012;14:62-74.
4. Husten CG, Deyton LR. Understanding the Tobacco Control Act: efforts by the US Food and Drug Administration to make tobacco-related morbidity and mortality part of the USA's past, not its future. Lancet 2013;381:1570-80.
5. Bayer R, Gostin L, Marcus-Toll D. Repackaging cigarettes-will the courts thwart the FDA? N Engl J Med 2012;367:2065-7.
6. Ling PM, Glantz SA. Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: evidence from industry documents. Am J Public Health 2002;92:908-16.
7. Breslau N, Johnson EO, Hiripi E, et al. Nicotine dependence in the United States: prevalence, trends, and smoking persistence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:810-16.
8. Jha P, Ramasundarahettige C, Landsman V, et al. 21st-century hazards of smoking and benefits of cessation in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013;368:341-50.
9. Messer K, Trinidad DR, Al-Delaimy WK, et al. Smoking cessation rates in the United States: a comparison of young adult and older smokers. Am J Public Health 2008;98:317-22.
10. Cameron LD, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages. Tob Control 2015;24:e14-22.
11. Hammond D, Reid JL, Driezen P, et al. Pictorial health warnings on cigarette packs in the United States: an experimental evaluation of the proposed FDA warnings. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:93-102.
12. Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med 2012;43:101-16.
13. Moorman M, van den Putte B. The influence of message framing, intention to quit smoking, and nicotine dependence on the persuasiveness of smoking cessation messages. Addict Behav 2008;33:1267-75.
14. Strahan EJ, White K, Fong GT, et al. Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective. Tob Control 2002;11:183-90.
15. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S, et al. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes? Addiction 2012;107:1159-67.
16. Berg CJ, Thrasher JF, Westmaas JL, et al. College student reactions to health warning labels: sociodemographic and psychosocial factors related to perceived effectiveness of different approaches. Prev Med 2011;53:427-30.
17. Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, et al. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:674-82.
18. Bansal-Travers M, O'Connor R, Fix BV, et al. What do cigarette pack colors communicate to smokers in the U.S.? Am J Prev Med 2011;40:683-9.
19. Wong NC, Cappella JN. Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. J Appl Commun Res 2009;37:1-20.
20. Cornacchione J, Smith SW. The effects of message framing within the stages of change on smoking cessation intentions and behaviors. Health Commun 2012;27:612-22.
21. Munafo MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, et al. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 2011;106:1505-10.
22. Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference? J Adolesc Health 2010;46:385-92.
23. Prokhorov AV, Warneke C, de MC, et al. Self-reported health status, health vulnerability, and smoking behavior in college students: implications for intervention. Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5:545-52.
24. Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G, et al. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study. Tob Control 2011;20:367-73.
25. Falk EB, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD. From neural responses to population behavior: neural focus group predicts population-level media effects. Psychol Sci 2012;23:439-45.