Dilemmas of planning: Intervention, regulation, and investment

Planning Theory

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 296-315

  Savini, Federico ^a   Majoor, Stan ^a   Salet, Willem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

dilemma; interventions; investments; regulations; urban development

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; INVESTMENT; OPEN SPACE; PLANNING THEORY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84937034881     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: 17413052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095214531430     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. M.B.Aalbers (2013) Neoliberalism is dead … long live neoliberalism!International Journal of Urban and Regional Research37(3): 1083–1090.
2. A.AdairJ.BerryS.McGreal. (2003) Urban regeneration and property investment performance. Journal of Property Research20(4): 371–386.
3. E.R.AlexanderL.MazzaS.Moroni (2012) Planning without plans? Nomocracy or teleocracy for social-spatial ordering. Progress in Planning77(2): 37–87.
4. P.Allmendinger (2002) Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory1(1): 77–99.
5. P.AllmendingerG.Haughton (2009) Soft spaces, fuzzy boundaries, and metagovernance: The new spatial planning in the Thames Gateway. Environment and Planning A41(3): 617–633.
6. R.AnderssonS.Musterd (2005) Area-based policies: A critical appraisal. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie96(4): 377–389.
7. L.Andres (2013) Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: A critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places. Urban Studies50(4): 759–775.
8. A.Balducci (2011) Strategic planning as exploration. Town Planning Review82(5): 529–546.
9. A.BalducciL.BoelensJ.Hillier. (2011) Introduction: Strategic spatial planning in uncertainty: Theory and exploratory practice. Town Planning Review82(5): 481–501.
10. L.Boelens (2006) Beyond the plan: Towards a new kind of planning. disP42(167): 25–40.
11. L.Boelens (2010) Theorizing Practice and Practising Theory: Outlines for an Actor-Relational-Approach in Planning. Planning Theory9(1): 28–62.
12. H.Campbell (2012) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(2): 135–146.
13. S.R.CleggJ.V.da CunhaE.PinaeM.Cunha (2002) Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations55(5): 483–503.
14. C.CoglianeseR.Kagan (2007) Regulation and Regulatory Processes. Aldershot: Ashgate.
15. S.Dembski (2013) Case study Amsterdam Buiksloterham, the Netherlands: The challenge of planning organic transformation. CONTEXT Report 2. Amsterdam: AISSR Programme Group, Urban Planning.
16. G.De RooJ.HillierJ.van Wezemael (2012) Complexity and Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
17. A.DiGaetanoJ.S.Klemanski (1999) Power and City Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Urban Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
18. P.Du GayY.MilloP.Tuck (2012) Making government liquid: Shifts in governance using financialisation as a political device. Environment and Planning C30(6): 1083–1099.
19. S.S.Fainstein (1994) The City Builders: Property, Politics, and Planning in London and New York. Oxford: Blackwell.
20. S.S.Fainstein (2008) Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research32(4): 768–785.
21. V.Fedeli (2012) Planning in Italy, seventy years after the first national planning law. disP48(2): 106–113.
22. P.H.Feindt (2010) The great recession—A transformative moment for planning. International Planning Studies15(3): 169–174.
23. R.C.Feiock (2004) Politics, institutions and local land-use regulation. Urban Studies41(2): 363–375.
24. F.Fischer (2000) Citizens, Experts and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. New York: Taylor & Francis.
25. B.Flyvbjerg (1998) Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
26. B.FlyvbjergN.BruzeliusW.Rothengatter (2003) Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. J.Friedmann (2000) Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. In: J.CampbellS.Fainstein (ed.) Readings in Planning Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 75–80.
28. G.E.Frug (1979) The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Review93: 1057–1154.
29. G.Galster (1997) Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies: Sub-market and spatial perspectives. Housing Studies12(4): 561–577.
30. M.GilmartinD.LearmouthJ.K.Swales. (2013) Regional policy spillovers: The national impact of demand-side policy in an interregional model of the UK economy. Environment and Planning A45(4): 814–834.
31. M.R.Glenn (2005) Brownfields Capital—Unlocking value in environmental redevelopment. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management11(1): 81–92.
32. I.GoldinT.Vogel (2010) Global governance and systemic risk in the 21st century: Lessons from the financial crisis. Global Policy1(1): 4–15.
33. S.GrahamP.Healey (1999) Relational concepts of space and place: Issues for planning theory and practice. European Planning Studies7(5): 623–646.
34. E.GualiniS.Majoor (2007) Innovative practices in large urban development projects: Conflicting frames in the quest for “new urbanity.”Planning Theory & Practice8(3): 297–318.
35. A.Harding (1997) Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities?European Urban and Regional Studies4(4): 291–314.
36. P.Healey (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. New York: Taylor & Francis.
37. J.Hillier (2003) Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be “Real.”Planning Theory2(1): 37–59.
38. J.Hillier (2011) Strategic navigation across multiple planes: Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning. Town Planning Review82(5): 503–527.
39. R.G.Holcombe (2013) Planning and the invisible hand: Allies or adversaries?Planning Theory12(2): 199–210.
40. M.Howlett (2005) What is a policy instrument? Tools, mixes, and implementation styles. In: P.EliadisM.M.HillM.Howlett (eds) Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 31–50.
41. M.Huxley (2000) The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research19(4): 369–377.
42. J.E.InnesD.Booher (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems. Journal of the American Planning Association65(4): 412–423.
43. J.E.InnesD.Booher (2010) Planning with Complexity. London: Routledge.
44. L.B.Janssen-Jansen (2012) The Dutch office space tragedy: Unlocking the lock-in. In: T.HartmannB.Needham (eds) Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered. Farnham: Ashgate, 189–205.
45. C.Jones (1996) The theory of property-led local economic development policies. Regional Studies30(8): 797–801.
46. L.O.KirkpatrickM.P.Smith (2011) The infrastructural limits to growth: Rethinking the urban growth machine in times of fiscal crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(3): 477–503.
47. P.R.LawrenceJ.W.Lorsch (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly12(1): 1–47.
48. M.W.Lewis (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review25(4): 760–776.
49. C.E.Lindblom (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review19(2): 79–88.
50. R.B.McLaughlin (2012) Land use regulation: Where have we been, where are we going?Cities29: S50–S55.
51. R.Mäntysalo (2002) Dilemmas in critical planning theory. Town Planning Review73(4): 417–436.
52. L.Mazza (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Planning Theory1(1): 11–26.
53. G.Morgan (1997) Images of Organization. 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
54. S.Moroni (2010) Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation: Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory9(2): 137–155.
55. S.OosterlynckL.AlbrechtsF.Moulaert (2011) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change. Abingdon: Routledge.
56. D.PonziniM.Nastasi (2011) Starchitecture: Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities. Turin: Umberto Allemandi & Co.
57. S.P.Poole Van de A.H. Ven (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review14(4): 562–578.
58. J.Portugali (2008) Learning from paradoxes about prediction and planning in self-organizing cities. Planning Theory7(3): 248–262.
59. M.RacoE.Street (2012) Resilience planning, economic change and the politics of post-recession development in London and Hong Kong. Urban Studies49(5): 1065–1087.
60. H.RittelM.Webber (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4: 155–169.
61. T.Rutland (2010) The financialization of urban redevelopment. Geography Compass4(8): 1167–1178.
62. L.B.Sagalyn (1997) Negotiating for public benefits: The bargaining calculus of public-private development. Urban Studies34(12): 1955–1970.
63. W.SaletL.BertoliniM.Giezen (2012) Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Epub ahead of print 2March. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01133.x.
64. F.Savini (2012) The governability of national spatial planning: Light instruments and logics of governmental action in strategic urban development. Urban Studies50(8): 1592–1607.
65. F.Savini (2013) Political dilemmas in peripheral development: Investment, regulation, and interventions in metropolitan Amsterdam. Planning Theory & Practice14(3): 333–348.
66. F.Savini (2014) What happens to the periphery? The political tensions of postindustrial redevelopment in Milan. Urban Affairs Review. 50(2): 180–205.
67. J.S.Scott (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68. W.K.SmithM.W.Lewis (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review36(2): 381–403.
69. C.N.Stone (1993) Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs15(1): 1–28.
70. E.SwyngedouwF.MoulaertA.Rodriguez (2002) Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large–scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode34(3): 542–577.
71. N.Thrift (2000) Not a straight line but a curve, or, cities are not mirrors of modernity. In: D.BellA.Haddour (eds) City Visions. London: Longman, 233–263.
72. A.TismaL.BijlsmaE.Dammer (2007) Private initiatives in housing developments in the Netherlands and the role of directed urban design. In:43rd ISOCARP congress, Antwerp, Belgium, 19–23September.
73. C.TurnerS.R.CarpenterE.J.Gustafson. (2012) Land Use. CALI eLangdell Press.
74. M.Van der HeideS.J.H.Majoor (2013) Ambidexterity in de Zuidas. Rooilijn46(3): 172–181.
75. E.Van der KrabbenH.M.Jacobs (2013) Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy30(1): 774–783.
76. M.Van RijswickW.Salet (2012) Enabling the contextualization of legal rules in responsive strategies to climate change. Ecology and Society17(2): 18.