Area-based policies: A critical appraisal

Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie

Volumn 96, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 377-389

  Andersson, Roger ^a   Musterd, Sako ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Area based policy; Comparative analysis; Europe; Mix; Neighbourhoods; Segregation

Indexed keywords

EID: 23244454959     PISSN: 0040747X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00470.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aalbers, M. (2003), Redlining in Nederland; Oorzaken en Gevolgen van Uitsluiting op de Hypotheekmarkt. Amsterdam: Aksant.
2. Andersson, R (1999), 'Divided Cities' as a Policy-based Notion in Sweden. Housing Studies 14, pp. 601-624.
3. Andersson, R. (2000), Etnisk och Sociockonomisk Segregation i Sverige 1990-1998. SOU 2000:37, Arbetsmarknad, Demografi och Segregation, pp. 223-266. Stockholm: Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer.
4. Andersson, R. (2001), Spaces of Socialization and Social Network Competition: A Study of Neighbourhood Effects in Stockholm, Sweden. In: H.T. Andersen & R. van Kempen, eds., Governing European Cities: Social Fragmentation and Urban Governance, pp. 149-188. Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. Andersson, R. (2003), Urban Development Programmes in a Scandinavian Welfare State: A Top-down Approach to Bottom-up Planning? In: P. de Decker, J. Vranken, J. Beaumont & I. van Nieuweniiuyze, On the Origins of Urban Development Programmes in Nine European Countries, pp. 165-181. Antwerpe Apeldoorn: Garant.
6. Andersson, R. (2004), Understanding the Production and Reproduction of Poor Neighbourhoods in Sweden. Paper for the international conference 'Inside Poverty areas', Cologne, 25-28 November.
7. Atkinson, R. (2002), Does Gentrification Help or Harm Urban Neighbourhoods? An Assessment of the Evidence-base in the Context of the New Urban Agenda. Bristol: ESRC Centre for Neighbourhood Research. .
8. Atkinson, R. & K. Kintrea (2001), Disentangling Area Effects: Evidence from Deprived and Non-deprived Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 38, pp. 2277-2298.
9. Bady, M., M. Blanc, C. Jacquier & D. Mansanti (2002), Rapport sur l'evaluation Croisee en France; Lyon et Chambery. CERAT. Pôle 'Villes et solidarités'. Institut d'Etudes Politique de Grenoble CNRS.
10. Briggs, X. de Souza (1997), Moving Up versus Moving Out: Neighborhood Effects in Housing Mobility Programs. Housing Policy Debate 8, pp. 195-234.
11. Briggs, X. de Souza (2003), Re-shaping the Geography of Opportunity: Place Effects in Global Perspective. Housing Studies 18, pp. 915-936.
12. Buck, N. (2001), Identifying Neighbourhood Effects on Social Exclusion. Urban Studies 38, pp. 2251-2275.
13. Burgers, J. & J. Vranken, eds. (2003), How to Make a Successful Urban Development Programme; Experiences from Nine European Countries. Antwerp: UGIS.
14. Coleman, A. (1985), Utopia on Trial. London: Hillary Shipman.
15. Decker, P. de, I. van Nieuwenhuyze & J. Vranken (2001), Urban Development Programmes in Ghent and Flanders (Antwerp). A working paper for UGIS urban development programmes (Urban Governance, Social Inclusion & Sustainability). .
16. Decker, P. de, J. Vranken, J. Beaumont & I. van Nieuwenhuyze, eds. (2003), On the Origins of Urban Development Programmes in Nine European Countries. Antwerp/Apeldoorn: Garant.
17. Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik, ed. (2002), Die Soziale Stadt. Berlin: DIFU.
18. Ellen, I.G. & M.A. Turner (1997), Does Neighborhood Matter? Assessing Recent Evidence. Housing Policy Debate 8, pp. 833-866.
19. Farwick, A. (2002), Segregierte Armut und Soziale Benachteiligung. In : A. Mayr, M. Meurer & J. Vogt, eds., Stadt und Region; Dynamik von Lebenswelten, pp. 292-305. Leipzig: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geographie.
20. Friedrichs, J. (1998), Do Poor Neighbourhoods Make Their Residents Poorer? Context Effects of Poverty Neighbourhoods on Residents. In : H.-J. Andress, ed., Empirical Poverty Research in Comparative Perspective, pp. 77-99. Aldershot: Ashgate.
21. Galster, G. (2002a), Trans-Atlantic Perspectives on Opportunity, Deprivation and the Housing Nexus. Housing Studies 17, pp. 5-12.
22. Galster, G. (2002b), An Economic Efficiency Analysis of Deconcentrating Poverty Populations. Journal of Housing Economics 11, pp. 303-329.
23. Galster, G. & S. Killen (1995), The Geography of Metropolitan Opportunity: A Reconnaissance and Conceptual Framework. Housing Policy Debate 6, pp. 7-44.
24. Galster, G. & A. Zobel (1998), Will Dispersed Housing Programmes Reduce Social Problems in the US? Housing Studies 13, pp. 605-622.
25. Housing Policy Debate 6, pp. 1-297.
26. Housing Studies 17, pp. 5-165.
27. Johnson, M.P., H.F. Ladd & J. Ludwig (2002), The Benefits and Costs of Residential Mobility Programs for the Poor. Housing Studies 17, pp. 125-138.
28. Kearns, A. (2002), Response: From Residential Disadvantage to Opportunity? Reflections on British and European Policy and Research. Housing Studies 17, pp. 145-150.
29. Kempen, E. van & S. Musterd (1991), High-rise Housing Reconsidered: Some Research and Policy Implications. Housing Studies 6, pp. 83-95.
30. Kleit, R.G. (2002), Job Search Networks and Strategies in Scattered-site Public Housing. Housing Studies 17, pp. 83-100.
31. Leventhal, T. & J. Brooks-Gunn (2000), The Neighbourhoods They Live in: The Effects of Neighbourhood Residence on Child and Adolescent Outcomes. Psychological Bulletin 126, pp. 309-337.
32. Lewis, O. (1966), The Culture of Poverty. In: R.T. LeGates & F. Stout, eds., The City Reader, pp. 217-224. London, New York: Routledge.
33. Massey, D.S. & N.A Denton (1993), American Apartheid. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
34. Musterd, S. (2002), Response: Mixed Housing Policy: A European (Dutch) Perspective. Housing Studies 17, pp. 139-143.
35. Musterd, S. & A. Murie, eds. (2002), The Spatial Dimensions of Urban Social Exclusion and Integration: Final Report. Urbex series, no. 22. Amsterdam: AME.
36. Musterd, S. & M. De Winter (1998), Conditions for Spatial Segregation: Some European Perspectives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22, pp. 665-673.
37. Musterd, S., W. Ostendorf & S. de Vos (2001), Armoedeconcentraties en Sociale Effecten in Dynamisch Perspectief; De Relatieve Concentratie van Huishoudens met een Zwakke Sociaal-economische Positie en de Effecten Daarvan op hun Sociale Mobiliteit: De Ontwikkeling Tussen 1989 en 1994. Amsterdam: AME.
38. Musterd, S., W. Ostendorf & S. de Vos (2003), Environmental Effects and Social Mobility. Housing Studies 18, pp. 877-892.
39. Ostendorf, W., S. Musterd & S. de Vos (2001), Social Mix and the Neighbourhood Effect. Policy Ambitions and Empirical Evidence. Housing Studies 16, pp. 371-80.
40. Robson, B., M. Parkinson, M. Boddy & D. Maclennan (2000), The State of English Cities. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
41. Rosenbaum, J.E. (1995), Changing the Geography of Opportunity be Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program. Housing Policy Debate 6, pp. 231-269.
42. Rosenbaum, J.E., L. Reynolds & S. Deluca (2002), How do Places Matter? The Geography of Opportunity, Self-efficacy and a Look Inside the Black Box of Residential Mobility. Housing Studies 17, pp. 71-82.
43. Ross, S.L. & J. Yinger (1999), Does Discrimination in Mortgage Lending Exist? The Boston Fed Study and its Critics. In: M.A. Turner & F. Skidmore, eds., Mortgage Lending Discrimination: A Review of Existing Evidence, pp. 43-83. Washington: The Urban Institute.
44. Sampson, R.J., J.D. Morenoff & T. Gannon-Rowley (2002), Assessing 'Neighbourhood Effects': Social Processes and New Directions in Research. Annual Review of Sociology 28, pp. 443-478.
45. White, P. (1998), Ideologies, Social and Spatial Segregation in Paris. In: S. Musterd & W. Ostendarf, eds., Urban Segregation and the Welfare State, Inequality and Exclusion in Western Cities, pp. 148-167. London: Routledge.
46. Whitehead, C. (2002), Response: Housing, Tenure and Opportunity. Housing Studies 17, pp. 63-68.
47. Wilson, W.J. (1987), The Truly Disadvantaged, The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.