Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience

Land Use Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 774-783

  van der Krabben, Erwin ^a   Jacobs, Harvey M ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Land policy; Public land development; The Netherlands; The United States of America; Urban transformation projects

Indexed keywords

LAND USE PLANNING; PUBLIC SECTOR; REDEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

NETHERLANDS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84862998747     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adams D., Disberry A., Hutchinson N., Munjoma T. Managing urban land: the case for urban partnership zones. Regional Studies 2001, 35(1):153-162.
2. Alexander F.S. Land bank strategies for renewing urban land. Journal of Affordable Housing 2005, 14(2):140-169.
3. Alterman R. The Challenge of Farmland Preservation: Lessons from a Six-Nation Comparision. Journal of the American Planning Association 1997, 63(2):220-243.
4. Alterman R. More than Land Assembly: Land Readjustment for the Supply of Urban Public Services 2007, 57-88. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA. Hong, Needham (Eds.).
5. Alterman R. Can the unearned increment in land values be harnessed to supply affordable housing?. UN Habitat GLNT Conference 2009.
6. Atmer T. Land banking in Stockholm. Habitant International 1987, 11(1):47-55.
7. Babcock R.F. Zoning Game: Municipal Practices and Policies 1966, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
8. Beatley T. Green Urbanism: Learning from European Cities 2000, Island Press, Washington, DC.
9. Binnenlands Bestuur Grote verliezen op grondexploitaties 2010, Binnenlands Bestuur, (14 June 2010).
10. Bontje M. A Planner's paradise lost? Past, present and future of Dutch national urbanization policy. European Urban and Regional Studies 2003, 10(2):135-151.
11. Briffault R. The most popular tool: Tax increment financing and the political economy of local government. The University of Chicago Law Review 2010, 77(1):65-95.
12. Bryant R.W.G. Land: Private Property, Public Control 1972, Harvest House, Montreal.
13. Buitelaar E. Cracks in the Myth: Challenges to Land Policy in the Netherlands. TESG 2010, 101(3):349-356.
14. Buitelaar E., Segeren A., Kronberger P. Stedelijke Transformatie en Grondeigendom 2008, NAI Uitgevers/PBL, The Hague.
15. Buitelaar E., Bregman A., Broek Van De L., Evers D., Nieuwenhuizen W., Sorel N. Ex-durante evaluatie Wet Ruimtelijke Ordening, eerste resultaten 2010, NAI Uitgevers/PBL, The Hague.
16. Buttenheim H.S. Urban land policies. Urban Planning and Land Policies. Part III of Vol. II of the Supplementary Report of the Urbanism Committee to the National Resources Committee 1939, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, pp. 211-348.
17. Calavita N., Mallach A. Inclusionary housing, incentives and land value recapture. Land Lines 2009, 21(1):15-21.
18. Cullingworth B. The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective 1994, New York/London, Routledge.
19. Davy B. Mandatory Happiness? Land Readjustment and Property in Germany 2007, 37-56. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA. Hong, Needham (Eds.).
20. De Greef J.H. Het Gevecht om het Residu 1997, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
21. Delafons J. Land Use Control in the United States 1969, MIT Press, Cambridge.
22. Deloitte Real Estate Advisory, 2011. Financiële effecten crisis bij gemeentelijke grondbedrijven: update. VNG, Den Haag.
23. Dewar M. Selling tax reverted land. Journal of the American Planning Association 2006, 72(2):167-180.
24. De Wolff, H., 2007. The new Dutch land development act as a tool for value capturing. Paper presented at the ENHR Conference 'Sustainable Urban Areas', Rotterdam, June 2007.
25. Doebele W.A. Land Readjustment. A Different Approach to Financing Urbanization 1982, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.
26. Doebele, W.A., 2002. Introductory remarks. Paper presented at Tools for Land Management and Development: Land Readjustment. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.
27. Eichler E., Kaplan M. The Community Builders 1967, University of California, Berkeley.
28. Fishman R.P., Gross R.D. Public land banking: a new praxis for urban growth. Case Western Reserve Law Review 1972, 23:897-975.
29. Golland A. Models for Land Assembly in the UK. A Comparative Analysis of Other European Approaches 2003, RICS Foundation, London.
30. Groetelaars, D., 2004. Instrumentarium locatieontwikkeling. Sturingsmogelijkheden voor gemeenten in een veranderende marktsituatie. Delft, DUP Science, Unpublished dissertation.
31. Hall E. Divide and sprawl, decline and fall: a comparative critique of euclidean zoning. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 2007, 68:915-952.
32. Hall P. A review of policy alternatives. Public Landownership: Framework for Evaluation 1976, 46-57. Lexington Books, Toronto. Kehoe, Dalton, A. et (Eds.).
33. Heller M., Hills R. Land assembly districts. Harvard Law Review 2008, 121(6):1465-1527.
34. Hirt S. The devil is in the definitions. Journal of the American Planning Association 2007, 73(4):436-450.
35. Analyzing Land Readjustment, Economics, Law, and Collective Action 2007, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA. Y. Hong, B. Needham (Eds.).
36. Howland M. Private initiative and public responsibility for the redevelopment of industrial brownfields: three Baltimore case studies. Economic Development Quarterly 2003, 17(4):367-381.
37. Howland M. The private market for brownfield properties. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 2010, 12(3):37-54.
38. Jacobs H.M. The future of the regulatory takings issue in the U.S, and Europe: divergence or convergence?. Urban Lawyer 2008, 40(1):51-72.
39. Jacobs H.M. Talking about property rights over tea: discourse and policy in the U.S. and Europe, in Planning by Law and Property Rights. Surrey 2012, 71-96. Ashgate, England/Burlington, VT. T. Hartmann, B. Needham (Eds.).
40. Jacobs H.M., Bassett E.M. After Kelo; political rhetoric and policy responses. Land Lines 2010, 22(2):14-20.
41. Jacobs H.M., Bassett E.M. All sound, no fury? The impacts of state-based Kelo laws. Planning and Environmental Law 2011, 63(2):3-8.
42. Korthals Altes W.K., De Graaf B. Grondmarkt en ruimte voor economische dynamiek. Stedebouw en ruimtelijke ordening 1998, 79(3):40-46.
43. Korthals Altes W.K. Actief Grondbeleid Betaalt zich Terug. Property Research Quarterly 2008, 1:22-27.
44. Kushner J.A. A tale of three cities: land development and planning for growth in Stockholm, Berlin and Los Angeles. The Urban Lawyer 1993, 25(2):197-221.
45. Laanly C., Renard V. Public land banking. Land Policy in France 1990, 47-56. ADEF, Paris. V. Renard, J. Comby (Eds.).
46. Lefcoe G. When governments become land developers: notes on the public sector experience in the Netherlands and California. California Law Review 1977, 51:165-263.
47. Levine J. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land Use 2006, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
48. Liebmann G.W. Land Readjustment for America: A Proposal for a Statute 1998, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, USA.
49. Louw E. Land assembly for urban transformation-the case of 's-Hertogenbosch in the Netherlands. Land Use Policy 2008, 25(1):69-80.
50. Luijt J., Kuhlman J.W., Pilkes J. Agrarische grondprijzen onder stedelijke druk, Stedelijke optiewaarde en agrarische gebruikswaarde afhankelijk van ligging 2003, Landbouweconomisch Instituut, den Haag.
51. Minkus M.J. Fighting uncertainty: municipal partnerships with redevelopment agencies can mitigate uncertainty to encourage brownfield redevelopment. Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal 2007, 1(1):267-316.
52. Minvrom, 1992. Vierde Nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening Extra: op weg naar 2015. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Staatsuitgeverij, Den Haag.
53. Needham B. Land policy in the Netherlands. TESG 1997, 87:291-296.
54. Needham B. Dutch Land-use Planning: Planning and Managing Land-use in the Netherlands, the Principles and the Practice 2007, Sdu Uitgevers, The Hague.
55. Needham B., Verhage R. The effects of land policy: quantity as well as quality is important. Urban Studies 1998, 35:25-44.
56. Needham B., Louw E. Institutional economics and policies for changing land markets: the case of industrial estates in the Netherlands. Journal of Property Research 2006, 23(1):75-90.
57. Nooteboom L.W., Needham B. Een miscalculatie op de grondmarkt. Economische Statistische Berichten 1995, 80(4031):982-984.
58. Priemus H., Louw E. Changes in Dutch land policy: from monopoly towards competition in the building market. Environment and Planning B 2003, 30(3):369-378.
59. Ratcliffe J. Land Policy: An Exploration of the Nature of Land in Society 1976, Hutchinson Press, London.
60. Renard V. Property rights protection and spatial planning in European countries. Property Rights and Land Policy. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy: Proceedings of the 2008 Land Policy Conference 2009, G.K. Ingram, Y. Hong (Eds.).
61. Reps J.W. Requiem for Zoning. Planning 1964 1964, American Society of Planning Officials, Chicago.
62. Sagalyn L.B. Land Assembly, Land Readjustment, and Public-Private Redevelopment 2007, 159-182. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA. Y.H. Hong, B. Needham (Eds.).
63. Shultz M.M., Schmidman F. The potential application of land readjustment in the United States. Urban Lawyer 1990, 22(2):197-243.
64. Strong A.L. Land Banking: European Reality, American Prospects 1979, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
65. TK (Tweede Kamer Der Staten Generaal), 2008. Wijziging van de WRO wat betreft. Grondexploitatie. The Hague, Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal, document no. 30218.
66. van der Krabben E., Needham B. Land readjustment for value capturing; a new planning tool for urban redevelopment. Town Planning Review 2008, 79(6):651-672.
67. van der Krabben E., Buitelaar E. Industrial land and property markets: market processes, market institutions and market outcomes. The Dutch case. European Planning Studies 2011, 19(12):2127-2146.
68. Van Der Veen M. Contracting for Better Places: A Relational Analysis of Development Agreements in Urban Development Projects 2009, IOS/Delft University Press, Amsterdam.
69. Verhage R. The role of the public sector in urban development: lessons from Leidsche Rijn (the Netherlands). Planning Theory and Practice 2003, 4(1):29-44.
70. VROM Raad Grond voor Kwaliteit. Voorstellen voor verbetering van overheidsregie op (binnen)stedelijke ontwikkeling. VROM Raad Advies 2009, VROM Raad, Den Haag.
71. Weber R. Selling city futures: the financialization of urban redevelopment policy. Economic Geography 2010, 86(4):251-274.