Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 74, Issue , 2015, Pages 96-107

  Roy, Lucia B ^a,b   Sparing, Roland ^c   Fink, Gereon R ^a,b   Hesse, Maike D ^a,b  

^a FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JÜLICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c HELIOS Clinic Holthausen Clinic for Neurological and Neurosurgical Rehabilitation   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lateralized attention network test; Posterior parietal cortex; Spatial attention; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Visual field asymmetries

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELD; COGNITION; MENTAL DISORDERS; PARIETAL LOBE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; PARIETAL LOBE; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 84936890527     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Akerstedt T., Gillberg M. Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int. J. Neurosci. 1990, 52(1-2):29-37.
2. Andrews S.C., Hoy K.E., Enticott P.G., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul. 2011, 4(2):84-89. 10.1016/j.brs.2010.06.004.
3. Antal A., Nitsche M.A., Kruse W., Kincses T.Z., Hoffmann K.P., Paulus W. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor co-ordination by improving motion perception in humans. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2004, 16(4):521-527. 10.1162/089892904323057263.
4. Au-Yeung S.S., Wang J., Chen Y., Chua E. Transcranial direct current stimulation to primary motor area improves hand dexterity and selective attention in chronic stroke. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000127.
5. Backes V., Kellermann T., Voss B., Krämer J., Depner C., Schneider F., Habel U. Neural correlates of the attention network test in schizophrenia. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2011, 261(Suppl 2):S155-S160. 10.1007/s00406-011-0264-9.
6. Ball K., Lane A.R., Smith D.T., Ellison A. Site-dependent effects of tDCS uncover dissociations in the communication network underlying the processing of visual search. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6(6):959-965. 10.1016/j.brs.2013.06.001.
7. Barker-Collo S., Feigin V., Lawes C., Senior H., Parag V. Natural history of attention deficits and their influence on functional recovery from acute stages to 6 months after stroke. Neuroepidemiology 2010, 35(4):255-262. 10.1159/000319894.
8. Barker-Collo S.L., Feigin V.L., Lawes C.M., Parag V., Senior H. Attention deficits after incident stroke in the acute period: frequency across types of attention and relationships to patient characteristics and functional outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010, 17(6):463-476. 10.1310/tsr1706-463.
9. Batsikadze G., Moliadze V., Paulus W., Kuo M.F., Nitsche M.A. Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 2013, 591(Pt 7):1987-2000. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730.
10. Benwell C.S., Harvey M., Thut G. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length. Neuroimage 2014, 86:370-380. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.014.
11. Berryhill M.E., Jones K.T. tDCS selectively improves working memory in older adults with more education. Neurosci. Lett. 2012, 521(2):148-151. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.074.
12. Berryhill M.E., Wencil E.B., Branch Coslett H., Olson I.R. A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 479(3):312-316. 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.087.
13. Bindman L.J., Lippold O.C., Redfearn J.W. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. J. Physiol. 1964, 172:369-382.
14. Boggio P.S., Campanhã C., Valasek C.A., Fecteau S., Pascual-Leone A., Fregni F. Modulation of decision-making in a gambling task in older adults with transcranial direct current stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 2010, 31(3):593-597. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07080.x.
15. Bolognini N., Fregni F., Casati C., Olgiati E., Vallar G. Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res 2010, 1349:76-89. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.06.053.
16. Bolognini N., Olgiati E., Rossetti A., Maravita A. Enhancing multisensory spatial orienting by brain polarization of the parietal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31(10):1800-1806. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07211.x.
17. Cerruti C., Schlaug G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex enhances complex verbal associative thought. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2009, 21(10):1980-1987. 10.1162/jocn.2008.21143.
18. Chi R.P., Fregni F., Snyder A.W. Visual memory improved by non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Res. 2010, 1353:168-175. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.062.
19. Chica A.B., Bartolomeo P., Valero-Cabré A. Dorsal and ventral parietal contributions to spatial orienting in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31(22):8143-8149. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5463-10.2010.
20. Chica A.B., Thiebaut de Schotten M., Toba M., Malhotra P., Lupiáñez J., Bartolomeo P. Attention networks and their interactions after right-hemisphere damage. Cortex 2012, 48(6):654-663. 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.01.009.
21. Coffman B.A., Clark V.P., Parasuraman R. Battery powered thought: enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage 2014, 85(Pt 3):895-908. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.083.
22. Coffman B.A., Trumbo M.C., Clark V.P. Enhancement of object detection with transcranial direct current stimulation is associated with increased attention. BMC Neurosci. 2012, 13:108. 10.1186/1471-2202-13-108.
23. Cohen J. Eta-squared and partial Eta-squared in fixed factor anova designs. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1973.
24. Corbetta M., Kincade J.M., Shulman G.L. Neural systems for visual orienting and their relationships to spatial working memory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14(3):508-523. 10.1162/089892902317362029.
25. Corbetta M., Kincade M.J., Lewis C., Snyder A.Z., Sapir A. Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8(11):1603-1610. 10.1038/nn1574.
26. Corbetta M., Patel G., Shulman G.L. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 2008, 58(3):306-324. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.017.
27. Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3(3):201-215. 10.1038/nrn755.
28. Datta A., Baker J.M., Bikson M., Fridriksson J. Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient. Brain Stimul. 2011, 4(3):169-174. 10.1016/j.brs.2010.11.001.
29. Datta A., Bansal V., Diaz J., Patel J., Reato D., Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009, 2(4):201-207. 207.e201. 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005.
30. Datta A., Zhou X., Su Y., Parra L.C., Bikson M. Validation of finite element model of transcranial electrical stimulation using scalp potentials: implications for clinical dose. J. Neural Eng. 2013, 10(3):036018. 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036018.
31. Davis N.J., van Koningsbruggen M.G. "Non-invasive" brain stimulation is not non-invasive. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2013, 7:76. 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00076.
32. de Graaf T.A., Sack A.T. Null results in TMS: from absence of evidence to evidence of absence. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35(3):871-877. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.006.
33. Dockery C.A., Hueckel-Weng R., Birbaumer N., Plewnia C. Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(22):7271-7277. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0065-09.2009.
34. Doricchi F., Macci E., Silvetti M., Macaluso E. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(7):1574-1585. 10.1093/cercor/bhp215.
35. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonserach task. Percep. Psychophys. 1974.
36. Fan J., Byrne J., Worden M.S., Guise K.G., McCandliss B.D., Fossella J., Posner M.I. The relation of brain oscillations to attentional networks. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(23):6197-6206. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1833-07.2007.
37. Fan J., Gu X., Guise K.G., Liu X., Fossella J., Wang H., Posner M.I. Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks. Brain Cognit. 2009, 70(2):209-220. 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.002.
38. Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Fossella J., Flombaum J.I., Posner M.I. The activation of attentional networks. [Clinical Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.]. Neuroimage 2005, 26(2):471-479. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.004.
39. Fan J., McCandliss B.D., Sommer T., Raz A., Posner M.I. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. [Research support, non-U.S. gov't research support, U.S. gov't, non-P.H.S.]. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2002, 14(3):340-347. 10.1162/089892902317361886.
40. Fecteau S., Knoch D., Fregni F., Sultani N., Boggio P., Pascual-Leone A. Diminishing risk-taking behavior by modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex: a direct current stimulation study. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(46):12500-12505. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3283-07.2007.
41. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Shah N.J., Weiss P.H., Halligan P.W., Grosse-Ruyken M., Freund H.J. Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 2000, 54(6):1324-1331.
42. Fink G.R., Marshall J.C., Weiss P.H., Zilles K. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Neuroimage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0819.
43. Flöel A., Rösser N., Michka O., Knecht S., Breitenstein C. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2008, 20(8):1415-1422. 10.1162/jocn.2008.20098.
44. Fox P.T., Narayana S., Tandon N., Fox S.P., Sandoval H., Kochunov P., Lancaster J.L. Intensity modulation of TMS-induced cortical excitation: primary motor cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2006, 27(6):478-487. 10.1002/hbm.20192.
45. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Nitsche M., Bermpohl F., Antal A., Feredoes E., Pascual-Leone A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 166(1):23-30. 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6.
46. Fregni F., Boggio P.S., Santos M.C., Lima M., Vieira A.L., Rigonatti S.P., Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov. Disord. 2006, 21(10):1693-1702. 10.1002/mds.21012.
47. Fricke K., Seeber A.A., Thirugnanasambandam N., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A., Rothwell J.C. Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105(3):1141-1149. 10.1152/jn.00608.2009.
48. Greene D.J., Barnea A., Herzberg K., Rassis A., Neta M., Raz A., Zaidel E. Measuring attention in the hemispheres: the lateralized attention network test (LANT). Brain Cognit. 2008, 66(1):21-31. 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.003.
49. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007, 55(2):187-199. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026.
50. He B.J., Snyder A.Z., Vincent J.L., Epstein A., Shulman G.L., Corbetta M. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 2007, 53(6):905-918. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013.
51. He X., Lan Y., Xu G., Mao Y., Chen Z., Huang D., Pei Z. Frontoparietal regions may become hypoactive after intermittent theta burst stimulation over the contralateral homologous cortex in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110(12):2849-2856. 10.1152/jn.00369.2013.
52. Heilman K.M., Van Den Abell T. Right hemisphere dominance for attention: the mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of inattention (neglect). Neurology 1980, 30(3):327-330.
53. Herwig U., Satrapi P., Schönfeldt-Lecuona C. Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr. 2003, 16(2):95-99.
54. Hesse M.D., Sparing R., Fink G.R. Ameliorating spatial neglect with non-invasive brain stimulation: from pathophysiological concepts to novel treatment strategies. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2011, 21(5):676-702. 10.1080/09602011.2011.573931.
55. Hilgetag C.C., Théoret H., Pascual-Leone A. Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4(9):953-957. 10.1038/nn0901-953.
56. Hoddes E., Dement W.C., Zarcone V. The development and use of the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS). Psychophysiology 1972, 9(150).
57. Hoy K.E., Emonson M.R., Arnold S.L., Thomson R.H., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Testing the limits: Investigating the effect of tDCS dose on working memory enhancement in healthy controls. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(9):1777-1784. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.018.
58. Hsu T.Y., Tseng P., Liang W.K., Cheng S.K., Juan C.H. Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task. Neuroimage 2014, 98:306-313. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.069.
59. Hu P., Fan J., Xu P., Zhou S., Zhang L., Tian Y., Wang K. Attention network impairments in patients with focal frontal or parietal lesions. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 534:177-181. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.12.038.
60. Iyer M.B., Mattu U., Grafman J., Lomarev M., Sato S., Wassermann E.M. Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals. [Clinical Trial, Phase I Randomized Controlled Trial]. Neurology 2005, 64(5):872-875. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152986.07469.E9.
61. Jacobson L., Koslowsky M., Lavidor M. tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 216(1):1-10. 10.1007/s00221-011-2891-9.
62. Jones K.T., Berryhill M.E. Parietal contributions to visual working memory depend on task difficulty. Front. Psychiatry 2012, 3:81. 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00081.
63. Kang E.K., Baek M.J., Kim S., Paik N.J. Non-invasive cortical stimulation improves post-stroke attention decline. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2009, 27(6):645-650. 10.3233/RNN-2009-0514.
64. Karim A.A., Schneider M., Lotze M., Veit R., Sauseng P., Braun C., Birbaumer N. The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(1):205-213. 10.1093/cercor/bhp090.
65. Kellermann T., Reske M., Jansen A., Satrapi P., Shah N.J., Schneider F., Habel U. Latencies in BOLD response during visual attention processes. Brain Res. 2011, 1386:127-138. 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.023.
66. Kim Y.H., Min S.J., Ko M.H., Park J.W., Jang S.H., Lee P.K. Facilitating visuospatial attention for the contralateral hemifield by repetitive TMS on the posterior parietal cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 2005, 382(3):280-285. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.03.043.
67. Kincses T.Z., Antal A., Nitsche M.A., Bártfai O., Paulus W. Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(1):113-117.
68. Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Adv. Neurol. 1977, 18:41-49.
69. Konrad K., Neufang S., Hanisch C., Fink G.R., Herpertz-Dahlmann B. Dysfunctional attentional networks in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry 2006, 59(7):643-651. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.08.013.
70. Kraft A., Roehmel J., Olma M.C., Schmidt S., Irlbacher K., Brandt S.A. Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 207(3-4):283-290. 10.1007/s00221-010-2453-6.
71. Krause B., Márquez-Ruiz J., Kadosh R.C. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation: a role for cortical excitation/inhibition balance?. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:602. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00602.
72. Kuo M.F., Nitsche M.A. Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 2012, 43(3):192-199. 10.1177/1550059412444975.
73. Lückmann H.C., Jacobs H.I., Sack A.T. The Cross-functional role of frontoparietal regions in cognition-internal attention as the overarching mechanism. Prog Neurobiol. 2014, 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.002.
74. McDowd J.M., Filion D.L., Pohl P.S., Richards L.G., Stiers W. Attentional abilities and functional outcomes following stroke. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2003, 58(1):P45-53.
75. Miniussi C., Harris J.A., Ruzzoli M. Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013, 37(8):1702-1712. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.014.
76. Monte-Silva K., Kuo M.F., Hessenthaler S., Fresnoza S., Liebetanz D., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A. Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6(3):424-432. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.011.
77. Monte-Silva K., Kuo M.F., Liebetanz D., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A. Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103(4):1735-1740. 10.1152/jn.00924.2009.
78. Monti A., Cogiamanian F., Marceglia S., Ferrucci R., Mameli F., Mrakic-Sposta S., Priori A. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008, 79(4):451-453. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.135277.
79. Moos K., Vossel S., Weidner R., Sparing R., Fink G.R. Modulation of top-down control of visual attention by cathodal tDCS over right IPS. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(46):16360-16368. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6233-11.2012.
80. Mottaghy F.M., Willmes K., Horwitz B., Müller H.W., Krause B.J., Sturm W. Systems level modeling of a neuronal network subserving intrinsic alertness. Neuroimage 2006, 29(1):225-233. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.034.
81. Müller B., Basler H.D. Kurzfragebogen zur aktuellen Beanspruchung 1993, Beltz, Weinheim.
82. Müri R.M., Cazzoli D., Nef T., Mosimann U.P., Hopfner S., Nyffeler T. Non-invasive brain stimulation in neglect rehabilitation: an update. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013, 7:248. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00248.
83. Murphy T.H., Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10(12):861-872. 10.1038/nrn2735.
84. Mylius V., Ayache S.S., Zouari H.G., Aoun-Sebaïti M., Farhat W.H., Lefaucheur J.P. Stroke rehabilitation using noninvasive cortical stimulation: hemispatial neglect. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2012, 12(8):983-991. 10.1586/ern.12.78.
85. Nelson J.T., McKinley R.A., Golob E.J., Warm J.S., Parasuraman R. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs). NeuroImage 2012, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.061.
86. Nitsche M.A., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., Priori A., Lang N., Antal A., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008, 1(3):206-223. 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004.
87. Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J. Physiol. 2000, 527(Pt 3):633-639.
88. Ohn S.H., Park C.I., Yoo W.K., Ko M.H., Choi K.P., Kim G.M., Kim Y.H. Time-dependent effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the enhancement of working memory. Neuroreport 2008, 19(1):43-47. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f2adfd.
89. Petersen S.E., Posner M.I. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 35:73-89. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525.
90. Pirulli C., Fertonani A., Miniussi C. The role of timing in the induction of neuromodulation in perceptual learning by transcranial electric stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6(4):683-689. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.12.005.
91. Pirulli C., Fertonani A., Miniussi C. Is neural hyperpolarization by cathodal stimulation always detrimental at the behavioral level?. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 8:226. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00226.
92. Posner M.I. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1980, 32(1):3-25.
93. Posner M.I., Boies S.J. Components of attention. Psychol. Rev. 1971, 78(5):391-408. 10.1037/h0031333.
94. Posner M.I., Petersen S.E. The attention system of the human brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1990, 13:25-42. 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325.
95. Rinne P., Hassan M., Goniotakis D., Chohan K., Sharma P., Langdon D., Bentley P. Triple dissociation of attention networks in stroke according to lesion location. Neurology 2013, 81(9):812-820. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a2ca34.
96. Robertson E.M., Théoret H., Pascual-Leone A. Studies in cognition: the problems solved and created by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2003, 15(7):948-960. 10.1162/089892903770007344.
97. Robertson I.H., Murre J.M. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 125(5):544-575.
98. Rogalewski A., Breitenstein C., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W., Knecht S. Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 20(1):313-316. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03450.x.
99. Siebner H.R., Lang N., Rizzo V., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W., Lemon R.N., Rothwell J.C. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. [Research support, non-U.S. gov't]. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24(13):3379-3385. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5316-03.2004.
100. Silvanto J., Muggleton N., Walsh V. State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2008, 12(12):447-454. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.004.
101. Small D.M., Gitelman D.R., Gregory M.D., Nobre A.C., Parrish T.B., Mesulam M.M. The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention. Neuroimage 2003, 18(3):633-641.
102. Sparing R., Mottaghy F.M. Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction. Methods 2008, 44:329-337. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.02.001.
103. Sparing R., Thimm M., Hesse M.D., Küst J., Karbe H., Fink G.R. Bidirectional alterations of interhemispheric parietal balance by non-invasive cortical stimulation. Brain 2009, 132(Pt 11):3011-3020. 10.1093/brain/awp154.
104. Stagg C.J., Nitsche M.A. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011, 17(1):37-53. 10.1177/1073858410386614.
105. Stone D.B., Tesche C.D. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention. Neuroreport 2009, 20(12):1115-1119. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832e9aa2.
106. Sturm W., de Simone A., Krause B.J., Specht K., Hesselmann V., Radermacher I., Willmes K. Functional anatomy of intrinsic alertness: evidence for a fronto-parietal-thalamic-brainstem network in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37(7):797-805.
107. Sturm W., Willmes K. On the functional neuroanatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness. Neuroimage 2001, 14(1 Pt 2):S76-84. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0839.
108. Sunwoo H., Kim Y.H., Chang W.H., Noh S., Kim E.J., Ko M.H. Effects of dual transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke unilateral visuospatial neglect. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 554:94-98. 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.08.064.
109. Tadini L., El-Nazer R., Brunoni A.R., Williams J., Carvas M., Boggio P., Fregni F. Cognitive, mood, and electroencephalographic effects of noninvasive cortical stimulation with weak electrical currents. J. ECT 2011, 27(2):134-140. 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181e631a8.
110. Teo F., Hoy K.E., Daskalakis Z.J., Fitzgerald P.B. Investigating the role of current strength in tDCS modulation of working memory performance in healthy controls. Front. Psychiatry 2011, 2:45. 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00045.
111. Thiebaut de Schotten M., Dell'Acqua F., Forkel S.J., Simmons A., Vergani F., Murphy D.G., Catani M. A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14(10):1245-1246. 10.1038/nn.2905.
112. Thiel C.M., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Cerebral correlates of alerting, orienting and reorienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2004, 21(1):318-328.
113. Thienel R., Kellermann T., Schall U., Voss B., Reske M., Halfter S., Kircher T. Muscarinic antagonist effects on executive control of attention. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 12(10):1307-1317. 10.1017/S146114570999068X.
114. Thienel R., Voss B., Kellermann T., Reske M., Halfter S., Sheldrick A.J., Kircher T. Nicotinic antagonist effects on functional attention networks. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009, 12(10):1295-1305. 10.1017/S1461145709990551.
115. Tseng P., Hsu T.Y., Chang C.F., Tzeng O.J., Hung D.L., Muggleton N.G., Juan C.H. Unleashing potential: transcranial direct current stimulation over the right posterior parietal cortex improves change detection in low-performing individuals. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(31):10554-10561. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0362-12.2012.
116. Vallar G., Bolognini N. Behavioural facilitation following brain stimulation: implications for neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2011, 21(5):618-649. 10.1080/09602011.2011.574050.
117. Varga E.T., Elif K., Antal A., Zimmer M., Harza I., Paulus W., Kovács G. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the parietal cortex modifies facial gender adaptation. Ideggyogy Sz 2007, 60(11-12):474-479.
118. Vossel S., Weidner R., Driver J., Friston K.J., Fink G.R. Deconstructing the architecture of dorsal and ventral attention systems with dynamic causal modeling. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(31):10637-10648. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0414-12.2012.
119. Wagner T., Fregni F., Fecteau S., Grodzinsky A., Zahn M., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study. Neuroimage 2007, 35(3):1113-1124. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.027.
120. Wang H., Fan J. Human attentional networks: a connectionist model. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2007, 19(10):1678-1689. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1678.
121. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 54(6):1063-1070.
122. Weiss M., Lavidor M. When less is more: evidence for a facilitative cathodal tDCS effect in attentional abilities. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2012, 24(9):1826-1833. 10.1162/jocn_a_00248.
123. Wright J.M., Krekelberg B. Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization. J. Vis. 2014, 14(9). 10.1167/14.9.5.
124. Xu G.Q., Lan Y., Huang D.F., Rao D.Z., Pei Z., Chen L., Zeng J.S. Visuospatial attention deficit in patients with local brain lesions. Brain Res. 2010, 1322:153-159. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.072.