Reptilian transcriptomes v2.0: An extensive resource for sauropsida genomics and transcriptomics

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1827-1841

  Tzika, Athanasia C ^a,b   Ullate Agote, Asier ^a,b   Grbic, Djordje ^a,b   Milinkovitch, Michel C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Archosauria; Deep sequencing; Reptiles; Squamates; Transcriptomes; Turtles

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; CROCODILIAN; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; LIZARD; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; REPTILE; SNAKE;

ALLIGATORS AND CROCODILES; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOME; GENOMICS; LIZARDS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHYLOGENY; REPTILES; SNAKES;

EID: 84936794403     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evv106     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alfoldi J, et al. 2011. The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477(7366):587-591.
2. Altenhoff AM, Dessimoz C. 2009. Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput Biol. 5(1):e1000262.
3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215(3):403-410.
4. Bar-Yaacov D, et al. 2013. The first Chameleon transcriptome: comparative genomic analysis of the OXPHOS system reveals loss of COX8 in Iguanian lizards. Genome Biol Evol. 5(10):1792-1799.
5. Brandley MC, et al. 2012. Uterine gene expression in the live-bearing lizard, Chalcides ocellatus, reveals convergence of squamate reptile and mammalian pregnancy mechanisms. Genome Biol Evol. 4(3):394-411.
6. Brykczynska U, et al. 2013. Contrasted evolution of the vomeronasal receptor repertoires in mammals and squamate reptiles. Genome Biol Evol. 5(2):389-401.
7. Camacho C, et al. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421.
8. Castoe TA, et al. 2011. A multi-organ transcriptome resource for the Burmese Python (Python molurus bivittatus). BMC Res Notes. 4:310.
9. Castoe TA, et al. 2013. The Burmese python genome reveals themolecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110(51):20645-20650.
10. Chiari Y, et al. 2012. Phylogenomic analyses support the position of turtles as the sister group of birds and crocodiles (Archosauria). BMC Biol. 10:65.
11. Crawford NG, et al. 2012. More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs. Biol Lett. 8(5):783-786.
12. Dalquen DA, Dessimoz C. 2013. Bidirectional best hits miss many orthologs in duplication-rich clades such as plants and animals. Genome Biol Evol. 5(10):1800-1806.
13. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113.
14. Ekblom R, Galindo J. 2011. Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity (Edinb) 107((1):1-15.
15. Flicek P, et al. 2014. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(Database issue):D749-D755.
16. Fu L, et al. 2012. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28(23):3150-3152.
17. Genome 10K Community of Scientists. 2009. Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10,000 vertebrate species. J Hered. 100(6):659-674.
18. Gilbert C, et al. 2014. Endogenous hepadnaviruses, bornaviruses and circoviruses in snakes. Proc Biol Sci. 281(1791):20141122.
19. Grabherr MG, et al. 2011. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNASeq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 29(7):644-652.
20. Hedges SB, et al. 2006. TimeTree: a public knowledge-base of divergence times among organisms. Bioinformatics 22(23):2971-2972.
21. Huerta-Cepas J, et al. 2007. The human phylome. Genome Biol. 8(6):R109.
22. i5K Consortium. 2013. The i5K Initiative: advancing arthropod genomics for knowledge, human health, agriculture, and the environment. J Hered. 104(5):595-600.
23. Kersey PJ, et al. 2014. Ensembl Genomes 2013: scaling up access to genome-wide data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42(Database issue):D546-D552.
24. Khalturin K, et al. 2009. More than just orphans: are taxonomically-restricted genes important in evolution? Trends Genet. 25(9):404-413.
25. Kumar S, et al. 2012. Toward 959 nematode genomes.Worm 1(1):42-50.
26. Kunstner A, et al. 2010. Comparative genomics based on massive parallel transcriptome sequencing reveals patterns of substitution and selection across 10 bird species. Mol Ecol. 19(Suppl. 1):266-276.
27. Li H, et al. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25(16):2078-2079.
28. Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22(13):1658-1659.
29. Lindblad-Toh K, et al. 2011. A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals. Nature 478(7370):476-482.
30. Margres MJ, et al. 2013. The venom-gland transcriptome of the eastern coral snake (Micrurus fulvius) reveals high venom complexity in the intragenomic evolution of venoms. BMC Genomics 14:531.
31. Martin JA, Wang Z. 2011. Next-generation transcriptome assembly. Nat Rev Genet. 12(10):671-682.
32. Miller HC, et al. 2012. De novo sequence assembly and characterisation of a partial transcriptome for an evolutionarily distinct reptile, the tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus). BMC Genomics 13:439.
33. Neme R, Tautz D. 2013. Phylogenetic patterns of emergence of new genes support a model of frequent de novo evolution. BMC Genomics 14:117.
34. Parra G, et al. 2007. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23(9):1061-1067.
35. Ramskold D, et al. 2009. An abundance of ubiquitously expressed genes revealed by tissue transcriptome sequence data. PLoS Comput Biol. 5(12):e1000598.
36. Robertson G, et al. 2010. De novo assembly and analysis of RNA-seq data. Nat Methods. 7(11):909-912.
37. Schulz MH, et al. 2012. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics 28(8):1086-1092.
38. Schwartz TS, et al. 2010. A garter snake transcriptome: pyrosequencing, de novo assembly, and sex-specific differences. BMC Genomics 11:694.
39. Shaffer HB, et al. 2013. The western painted turtle genome, a model for the evolution of extreme physiological adaptations in a slowly evolving lineage. Genome Biol. 14(3):R28.
40. Sievers F, Higgins DG. 2014. Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. Methods Mol Biol. 1079:105-116.
41. Smedley D, et al. 2009. BioMart - biological queries made easy. BMC Genomics 10:22.
42. St John JA, et al. 2012. Sequencing three crocodilian genomes to illuminate the evolution of archosaurs and amniotes. Genome Biol. 13(1):415.
43. Tautz D, Domazet-Loso T. 2011. The evolutionary origin of orphan genes. Nat Rev Genet. 12(10):692-702.
44. Tzika AC, et al. 2008.MANTIS: a phylogenetic framework formulti-species genome comparisons. Bioinformatics 24(2):151-157.
45. Tzika AC, et al. 2011. Reptilian-transcriptome v1.0, a glimpse in the brain transcriptome of five divergent Sauropsida lineages and the phylogenetic position of turtles. Evodevo 2(1):19.
46. Ullate-Agote A, et al. Forthcoming 2015. The genome sequence of the corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus), a valuable resource for EvoDevo studies in squamates. Int J Dev Biol. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.150060at.
47. Vonk FJ, et al. 2013. The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 110(51):20651-20656.
48. Wan QH, et al. 2013. Genome analysis and signature discovery for diving and sensory properties of the endangered Chinese alligator. Cell Res. 23(9):1091-1105.
49. Wang Z, et al. 2013. The draft genomes of soft-shell turtle and green sea turtle yield insights into the development and evolution of the turtlespecific body plan. Nat Genet. 45(6):701-706.
50. Waterhouse RM, et al. 2013. OrthoDB: a hierarchical catalog of animal, fungal and bacterial orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(D1):D358-D365.
51. Zhulidov PA, et al. 2004. Simple cDNA normalization using Kamchatka crab duplex-specific nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(3):e37.