Data infrastructure: a review of expanding accountability systems and large-scale assessments in education

Discourse

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 765-777

  Sellar, Sam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84936764016     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596306.2014.931117     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. J.Allen, (2011). Topological twists: Power's shifting geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography, 1, 283–298. doi:10.1177/2043820611421546
2. D.Anagnostopoulos,, & J.Bautista-Guerra, (2013). Trust and numbers: Constructing and contesting statewide information systems. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 41–56). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
3. D.Anagnostopoulos,, S.A.Rutledge,, & R.Jacobsen, (Eds.). (2013). The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
4. S.J.Ball, (2012). Global education inc. London: Routledge.
5. S.J.Ball,, & C.Junemann, (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: The Policy Press.
6. G.Bateson, (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
7. M.Beller, (2013). Technologies in large-scale assessments: New directions, challenges, and opportunities. In M.von Davier, E.Gonzalez, I.Kirsch, & K.Yamamoto (Eds.), The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy and educational research (pp. 25–45). Dordrecht: Springer.
8. B.Bernstein, (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M.F.D.Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control (pp. 47–69). London: Collier-MacMillan.
9. G.C.Bowker,, K.Baker,, F.Millerand,, & D.Ribes, (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J.Husinger, L.Klastrup, & M.M.Allen (Eds.), International handbook of Internet research (pp. 97–117). Dordrecht and London: Springer.
10. S.Bowles,, H.Gintis,, & M.Osborne, (2001). The determinants of earnings: A behavioral approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 1137–1176. doi:10.1257/jel.39.4.1137
11. L.Cohen-Vogel,, L.Osborne-Lampkin,, & E.A.Houck, (2013). New data, old patterns: The role of test scores in student assignment. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 129–144). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
12. G.Deleuze,, & G.Guattari, (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13. L.M.Dorner,, & A.B.Layton, (2013). What makes a ‘good’ school? Data and competing discourses in a multilingual charter network. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 145–162). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14. F.Guattari, (2000). The three ecologies. London and New York, NY: Continuum.
15. R.Halverson,, & R.B.Shapiro, (2013). Technologies for education and technologies for learners: How information technologies are (and should be) changing schools. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 163–179). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
16. E.Hanushek,, & L.Woessman, (2013). The role of international assessments of cognitive skills in the analysis of growth and development. In M.von Davier, E.Gonzalez, I.Kirsch, & K.Yamamoto (Eds.), The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy and educational research (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.
17. B.W.Head, (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67(1), 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x
18. J.R.Henig, (2013). Foreword. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. vii–xiii). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
19. R.Jacobsen,, & A.Saultz, (2013). Do grades matter? Public accountability data and perceptions of school quality. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 199–211). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
20. J.Jennings,, & H.Sohn, (2013). A tale of two tests: Test scores, accountability, and inequality in American education. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 183–198). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
21. I.Kirsch,, M.Lennon,, M.von Davier,, E.Gonzalez,, & K.Yamamoto, (2013). On the growing importance of international large-scale assessments. In M.von Davier, E.Gonzalez, I.Kirsch, & K.Yamamoto (Eds.), The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy and educational research (pp. 1–11). Dordrecht: Springer.
22. B.Latour, (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
23. H.Levin, (2013). The utility and need for incorporating noncognitive skills into large-scale educational assessments. In M.von Davier, E.Gonzalez, I.Kirsch, & K.Yamamoto (Eds.), The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy and educational research (pp. 67–86). Dordrecht: Springer.
24. R.Leys, (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37, 434–472. doi:10.1086/659353
25. B.Lingard,, S.Sellar,, & G.Savage, (in press). Test-based accountabilities and data infrastructures: Rearticulations of social justice as equity in education policy. British Journal of Sociology of Education.
26. C.Lury,, L.Parisi,, & T.Terranova, (2012). Introduction: The becoming topological of culture. Theory, Culture and Society, 29(4/5), 3–35. doi:10.1177/0263276412454552
27. J.-F.Lyotard, (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G.Bennington & B.Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28. B.Massumi, (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
29. V.Mayer-Schonberger,, & K.N.Cukier, (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
30. H.Mintrop,, & G.L.Sunderman, (2013). The paradoxes of data-driven school reform: Learning from two generations of centralized accountability systems in the United States. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 23–39). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
31. S.Muecke, (2012). Motorcycles, snails, Latour: Criticism without judgement. Cultural Studies Review, 18(1), 40–58.
32. C.Mukerji, (2010). The territorial state as figured world of power: Strategies, logistics and impersonal rule. Sociological Theory, 28, 402–424. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01381.x
33. OECD. (2002). Education policy analysis. Paris: Author.
34. T.Picketty, (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
35. M.Power, (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. E.Ruppert, (2012). The governmental topologies of database devices. Theory, Culture and Society, 29(4/5), 116–136. doi:10.1177/0263276412439428
37. S.A.Rutledge,, & B.G.Neal, (2013). ‘The numbers speak for themselves’: Data use and the organization of schooling in two Florida elementary schools. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 113–128). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
38. M.Savage,, & R.Burrows, (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41, 885–899. doi:10.1177/0038038507080443
39. J.Scott,, & H.Jabar, (2013). Money and measures: The role of foundations in knowledge production. In D.Anagnostopoulos, S.A.Rutledge, & R.Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education (pp. 75–92). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
40. S.Sellar,, & B.Lingard, (2013). The expansion of PISA and new global modes of OECD governance in education. British Educational Research Journal. doi:10.1002/berj.3120
41. S.L.Star, (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioural Scientist, 43, 377–391. doi:10.1177/00027649921955326
42. S.L.Star,, & K.Ruhleder, (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111–134. doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111
43. I.Stengers, (2005). Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
44. I.Stengers, (2011). Comparison as a matter of concern. Common Knowledge, 17(1), 48–63. doi:10.1215/0961754X-2010-035
45. G.Thompson,, & I.Cook, (2014). Deforming education: Topologies, networks and the database effect. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.890411
46. N.Thrift, (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.
47. J.Torney-Purta,, & J.-A.Amadeo, (2013). The contributions of international large-scale assessments in civic education and engagement. In M.von Davier, E.Gonzalez, I.Kirsch, & K.Yamamoto (Eds.), The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy and educational research (pp. 87–114). Dordrecht: Springer.
48. M.von Davier,, E.Gonzalez,, I.Kirsch,, & K.Yamamoto, (2013). The role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy and educational research. Dordrecht: Springer.
49. S.J.Whatmore, (2009). Mapping knowledge controversies: Science, democracy and the redistribution of expertise. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 587–598. doi:10.1177/0309132509339841