Comprehensive characterization of complex structural variations in cancer by directly comparing genome sequence reads

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1106-1112

  Moncunill, Valentí ^a   Gonzalez, Santi ^a   Beà, Sílvia ^b   Andrieux, Lise O ^a   Salaverria, Itziar ^b   Royo, Cristina ^b   Martinez, Laura ^a   Puiggròs, Montserrat ^a,c   Segura Wang, Maia ^d   Stütz, Adrian M ^d   Navarro, Alba ^b   Royo, Romina ^a,c   Gelpí, Josep L ^a,b,c   Gut, Ivo G ^e   López Otín, Carlos ^f   Orozco, Modesto ^a,b,g   Korbel, Jan O ^d   Campo, Elias ^b,h   Puente, Xose S ^f   Torrents, David ^a,h  

^a BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^c National Institute of Bioinformatics   (Spain)

^d EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^e Centro Nacional de Analisis Genomico CNAG   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OVIEDO   (Spain)

^g INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^h INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; TUMORS;

AVERAGE SENSITIVITIES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INITIAL ALIGNMENT; INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS; PERFORMANCE TESTS; SEQUENCE VARIATIONS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDES; STRUCTURAL VARIATIONS;

GENES;

ARTICLE; CANCER GENETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA; MEDULLOBLASTOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOMATIC MUTATION; SOMATIC MUTATION FINDER; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN GENOME; MUTATION; NEOPLASM;

NUCLEOTIDE;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, HUMAN; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MUTATION; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEOTIDES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84936754552     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3027     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kandoth, C. et al. Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types. Nature 502, 333-339 (2013).
2. Frampton, G. M. et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1023-1031 (2013).
3. Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213-219 (2013).
4. Puente, X. S. et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 475, 101-105 (2011).
5. Degner, J. F. et al. Effect of read-mapping biases on detecting allele-specific expression from RNA-sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25, 3207-3212 (2009).
6. Chen, K. et al. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat. Methods 6, 677-681 (2009).
7. Rausch, T. et al. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics 28, i333-i339 (2012).
8. Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415-421 (2013).
9. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1, 092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56-65 (2012).
10. Ye, K., Schulz, M. H., Long, Q., Apweiler, R. & Ning, Z. Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads. Bioinformatics 25, 2865-2871 (2009).
11. Wang, J. et al. CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution. Nat. Methods 8, 652-654 (2011).
12. Beá, S. et al. Landscape of somatic mutations and clonal evolution in mantle cell lymphoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18250-18255 (2013).
13. Rausch, T. et al. Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell 148, 59-71 (2012).
14. Korbel, J. O. & Campbell, P. J. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 152, 1226-1236 (2013).
15. Gonzalez-Perez, A. et al. IntOGen-mutations identifies cancer drivers across tumor types. Nat. Methods 10, 1081-1082 (2013).
16. Baca, S. C. et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes. Cell 153, 666-677 (2013).
17. Shen, M. M. Chromoplexy: a new category of complex rearrangements in the cancer genome. Cancer Cell 23, 567-569 (2013).
18. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
19. Richter, J. et al. Recurrent mutation of the ID3 gene in Burkitt lymphoma identified by integrated genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 44, 1316-1320 (2012).
20. Teles Alves, I. et al. Next-generation sequencing reveals novel rare fusion events with functional implication in prostate cancer. Oncogene doi:10.1038/onc.2013.591 (3 February 2014).
21. Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J. R. & Marth, G. T. ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28, 593-594 (2012).
22. Young, M. A. et al. Background mutations in parental cells account for most of the genetic heterogeneity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10, 570-582 (2012).
23. Jones, D. T. et al. Recurrent somatic alterations of FGFR1 and NTRK2 in pilocytic astrocytoma. Nat. Genet. 45, 927-932 (2013).
24. Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).
25. Untergasser, A. et al. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e115 (2012).
26. Shaffer, L. G., McGowan-Jordan, J. & Schmid, M. (eds.) ISCN 2013: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (2013) (Kargar, 2013).
27. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639-1645 (2009).