L-GRAAL: Lagrangian graphlet-based network aligner

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 2182-2189

  Malod Dognin, Noël ^a   Pržulj, Nataša ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84936742402     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv130     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aladaʇ,A.E. and Erten,C. (2013) Spinal: scalable protein interaction network alignment. Bioinformatics, 29, 917-924.
2. Ashburner,M. et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet., 25, 25-29.
3. Bandyopadhyay,S. et al. (2006) Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison. Genome Res., 16, 428-435.
4. Brown,K.R. and Jurisica,I. (2007) Unequal evolutionary conservation of human protein interactions in interologous networks. Genome Biol., 8, R95.
5. Chatr-Aryamontri,A. et al. (2013) The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D816-D823.
6. Chindelevitch,L. et al. (2013) Optimizing a global alignment of protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics, 29, 2765-2773.
7. Clark,C. and Kalita,J. (2014) A comparison of algorithms for the pairwise alignment of biological networks. Bioinformatics, 30, 2351-2359.
8. Cook,S.A. (1971) The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC '71, Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA. ACM, New York, NY, pp. 151-158.
9. El-Kebir,M. et al. (2011) Lagrangian relaxation applied to sparse global network alignment. In: Loog,M. et al. (eds.) Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics, volume 7036 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, pp. 225-236.
10. Fields,S. and Song,O.K. (1989) A novel genetic system to detect proteinprotein interactions. Nature, 340, 245-246.
11. Flannick,J. et al. (2006) Graelin: general and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks. Genome Res., 16, 1169-1181.
12. Guignard,M. (2003) Lagrangean relaxation. TOP, 11, 151-200.
13. Hartwell,L.H. et al. (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature, 402, C47-C52.
14. Hashemifar,S. and Xu,J. (2014) Hubalign: an accurate and efficient method for global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics, 30, i438-i444.
15. Held,M. and Karp,R.M. (1970) The traveling-salesman problem and minimum spanning trees. Oper. Res., 18, 1138-1162.
16. Held,M. et al. (1974) Validation of subgradient optimization. Math. Programming, 6, 62-88.
17. Ho,Y. et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415, 180-183.
18. Kelley,B.P. et al. (2003) Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 11394-11399.
19. Kelley,B.P. et al. (2004) PathBLAST: A tool for alignment of protein interaction networks. Nucleic Acids Res., 32(Suppl. 2), W83-W88.
20. Koyutürk,M. et al. (2006) Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 182-199.
21. Kuchaiev,O. and Pržulj,N. (2011) Integrative network alignment reveals large regions of global network similarity in yeast and human. Bioinformatics, 27, 1390-1396.
22. Kuchaiev,O. et al. (2010) Topological network alignment uncovers biological function and phylogeny. J. R. Soc. Interface, 7, 1341-1354.
23. Maglott,D. et al. (2005) Entrez gene: gene-centered information at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res., 33(Suppl. 1), D54-D58.
24. Malod-Dognin,N. and Pržulj,N. (2014) GR-align: fast and flexible alignment of protein 3D structures using graphlet degree similarity. Bioinformatics, 30, 1259-1265.
25. Memišević,V. and Pržulj,N. (2012) C-GRAAL: Common-neighbors-based global GRAph ALignment of biological networks. Integr. Biol., 4, 734-743.
26. Milenković,T. and Pržulj,N. (2008) Uncovering biological network function via graphlet degree signatures. Cancer Inform., 6, 257.
27. Milenković,T. et al. (2010) Optimal network alignment with graphlet degree vectors. Cancer Inform., 9, 121-137.
28. Nepusz,T. and Paccanaro,A. (2014) Structural pattern discovery in protein-protein interaction networks. In: Kasabov, N. (ed.) Springer Handbook of Bio-/Neuroinformatics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, pp. 375-398.
29. Neyshabur,B. et al. (2013) NETAl: A new graph-based method for global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics, 29, 1654-1662.
30. Patro,R. and Kingsford,C. (2012) Global network alignment using multiscale spectral signatures. Bioinformatics, 28, 3105-3114.
31. Pržulj,N. (2007) Biological network comparison using graphlet degree distribution. Bioinformatics, 23, 177-183.
32. Pržulj,N. (2011) Protein-protein interactions: making sense of networks via graph-theoretic modeling. Bioessays, 33, 115-123.
33. Pržulj,N. et al. (2004) Modeling interactome: scale-free or geometric? Bioinformatics, 20, 3508-3515.
34. Resnik,P. (1995) Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy, Journal: arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9511007.
35. Richter,R. et al. (2010) A functional peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase, ict1, has been recruited into the human mitochondrial ribosome. EMBOJ., 29, 1116-1125.
36. Rost,B. (2002) Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J. Mol. Biol., 318, 595-608.
37. Ryan,C.J. et al. (2013) High-resolution network biology: connecting sequence with function. Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 865-879
38. Sahraeian,S.M.E and Yoon, B.-J. (2012). A network synthesis model for generating protein interaction network families. PLoS One, 7, e41474.
39. Saraph,V. and Milenković,T. (2014) Magna: Maximizing accuracy in global network alignment. Bioinformatics, 30, 2931-2940.
40. Seah,B.-S. et al. (2014). Dualaligner: A dual alignment-based strategy to align protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics, 30, 2619-2626.
41. Singh,R. et al. (2007) Pairwise global alignment of protein interaction networks by matching neighborhood topology. In: Speed,T. and Huang,H. (eds.), Research in Computational Molecular Biology, volume 4453 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany, pp. 16-31.
42. Storøy,S. and Sørevik,T. (1997) Massively parallel augmenting path algorithms for the assignment problem. Computing, 59, 1-16.
43. Tian,W. and Samatova,N. (2009) Pairwise alignment of interaction networks by fast identification of maximal conserved patterns. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Vol. 14, pp. 99-110.
44. Uetz,P. et al. (2006) Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science, 311, 239-242.
45. Zaslavskiy,M. et al. (2009) Global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks by graph matching methods. Bioinformatics, 25, i259-i1267.