Dietary adherence and acceptability of five different diets, including vegan and vegetarian diets, for weight loss: The New DIETs study

Eating Behaviors

Volumn 19, Issue , 2015, Pages 33-38

  Moore, Wendy J ^a   McGrievy, Michael E ^b   Turner McGrievy, Gabrielle M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Adherence; Diets; Vegan; Vegetarian; Weight loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL PRODUCT; ARTICLE; CHOLESTEROL INTAKE; DIET; DIETARY COMPLIANCE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD PREFERENCE; HUMAN; HUNGER; MALE; OMNIVORE DIET; PESCOVEGETARIAN DIET; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SATISFACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMI VEGETARIAN DIET; VEGAN DIET; VEGETARIAN DIET; WEIGHT REDUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; DIET; DIET, VEGAN; DIET, VEGETARIAN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WEIGHT LOSS;

EID: 84936741380     PISSN: 14710153     EISSN: 18737358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barnard N.D., Cohen J., Jenkins D.J., Turner-McGrievy G., Gloede L., Green A., Ferdowsian H. A low-fat vegan diet and a conventional diabetes diet in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled, 74-wk clinical trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009, 89(5):1588S-1596S. doi: ajcn.2009.26736H [pii] 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736H.
2. Barnard N.D., Gloede L., Cohen J., Jenkins D.J., Turner-McGrievy G., Green A.A., Ferdowsian H. A low-fat vegan diet elicits greater macronutrient changes, but is comparable in adherence and acceptability, compared with a more conventional diabetes diet among individuals with type 2 diabetes. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2009, 109(2):263-272. doi: S0002-8223(08)02042-7 [pii] 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.049.
3. Barnard N., Scialli A.R., Bertron P., Hurlock D., Edmonds K. Acceptability of a therapeutic low-fat, vegan diet in premenopausal women. Journal of Nutrition Education 2000, 32(6):314-319. 10.1016/S0022-3182(00)70590-5.
4. Barnard N.D., Scialli A.R., Turner-McGrievy G., Lanou A.J. Acceptability of a low-fat vegan diet compares favorably to a step II diet in a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation 2004, 24(4):229-235.
5. Berkow S.E., Barnard N., Eckart J., Katcher H. Four therapeutic diets: adherence and acceptability. Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research 2010, 71(4):199-204.
6. Burke L.E., Warziski M., Styn M.A., Music E., Hudson A.G., Sereika S.M. A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: The impact of treatment preference. International Journal of Obesity 2008, 32(1):166-176. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706.
7. Cappelleri J.C., Bushmakin A.G., Gerber R.A., Leidy N.K., Sexton C.C., Karlsson J., Lowe M.R. Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: Development and measurement properties. International Journal of Obesity 2009, 33(8):913-922. 10.1038/ijo.2009.107.
8. Cole M. Asceticism and hedonism in research discourses of veg*anism. British Food Journal 2008, 110(7):706-716. 10.1108/00070700810887176.
9. Field A.E., Colditz G.A., Fox M.K., Byers T., Serdula M., Bosch R.J., Peterson K.E. Comparison of 4 questionnaires for assessment of fruit and vegetable intake. American Journal of Public Health 1998, 88(8):1216-1218.
10. Forman E.M., Hoffman K.L., McGrath K.B., Herbert J.D., Brandsma L.L., Lowe M.R. A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study. Behaviour Research and Therapy 2007, 45(10):2372-2386. 10.1016/j.brat.2007.04.004.
11. Karlsson J., Persson L.O., Sjostrom L., Sullivan M. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000, 24(12):1715-1725.
12. Kristal A.R., Peters U., Potter J.D. Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire?. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2005, 14:2826-2828. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-ED1.
13. Lagerros Y.T., Mucci L.A., Bellocco R., Nyren O., Balter O., Balter K.A. Validity and reliability of self-reported total energy expenditure using a novel instrument. European Journal of Epidemiology 2006, 21(3):227-236. 10.1007/s10654-006-0013-y.
14. Lowe M.R. Self-regulation of energy intake in the prevention and treatment of obesity: Is it feasible?. Obesity Research 2003, 11(Suppl.):44S-59S. 10.1038/oby.2003.223.
15. Lowe M.R., Butryn M.L., Didie E.R., Annunziato R.A., Thomas J.G., Crerand C.E., Halford J. The Power of Food Scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment. Appetite 2009, 53(1):114-118. 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016.
16. Mendonca P.J., Brehm S.S. Effects of choice on behavioral treatment of overweight children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1983, 1(4):343-358.
17. Shay L.E. A concept analysis: Adherence and weight loss. Nursing Forum 2008, 43(1):42-52. 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2008.00095.x.
18. Stunkard A.J., Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1985, 29(1):71-83.
19. Subar A.F., Crafts J., Zimmerman T.P., Wilson M., Mittl B., Islam N.G., Thompson F.E. Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 2010, 110(1):55-64. doi: S0002-8223(09)01683-6 [pii] 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.007.
20. Turner-McGrievy G.M., Barnard N.D., Scialli A.R. A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2007, 15(9):2276-2281. doi: 15/9/2276 [pii] 10.1038/oby.2007.270.
21. Turner-McGrievy G.M., Davidson C.R., Wilcox S. Does the type of weight loss diet affect who participates in a behavioral weight loss intervention? A comparison of participants for a plant-based diet versus a standard diet trial. Appetite 2014, 73:156-162. 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.008.
22. Turner-McGrievy G.M., Davidson C.R., Wingard E.E., Wilcox S., Frongillo E.A. Comparative effectiveness of plant-based diets for weight loss: A randomized controlled trial of five different diets. Nutrition 2015, 31(2):350-358. 10.1016/j.nut.2014.09.002.
23. Turner-McGrievy G.M., Wirth M.D., Shivappa N., Wingard E.E., Fayad R., Wilcox S., Hébert J.R. Randomization to plant-based dietary approaches leads to larger short-term improvements in Dietary Inflammatory Index scores and macronutrient intake compared with diets that contain meat. Nutrition Research (New York) 2014, 35(2):97-106. 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.11.007.
24. U.S.News&WorldReport (Producer). Easiest diets to follow. U.S. News & World Report Health Retrieved from. http://health.usnews.com/best-diet/best-easy-diets?page=3.
25. Westerterp-Plantenga M.S., Kempen K.P., Saris W.H. Determinants of weight maintenance in women after diet-induced weight reduction. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 1998, 22(1):1-6.