Assessing ELT pre-service teachers via web 2.0 tools: Perceptions toward traditional, online and alternative assessment

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 9-19

  Cirit, Nazlı Ceren ^a  

^a Department of Forein Language Education Hasan Ali Yücel ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Alternative assessment; ELT pre service teachers; Web 2.0 tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84936148860     PISSN: 13036521     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Albion, P. (2008) Web 2.0 in teacher education: two imperatives for action. Computers in the Schools, 25 (3): 181-198.
2. Bailey, K. M. (1998) Learning about language assessment: Dilemmas, decisions, and directions. Cambridge, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
3. Balliro, L. (1993) What kind of alternative? Examining alternative assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (3): 558-561.
4. Barootchi, N., and Keshavarz, M. H. (2002) Assessment of achievement through portfolios and teacher-made tests, Educational Research, 44 (3): 279-288.
5. Cephe, P. T., and Balçıkanlı, C. (2012) Web 2.0 tools in language teaching: What do student teachers think? International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3 (1): 1-12.
6. Ching, Y.-H., and Hsu, Y.-C. (2011) Design-grounded assessment: A framework and a case study of web 2.0 practices in higher education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 27 (5): 781-797.
7. Crandall, J. A. (2000) Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20: 34-55.
8. Göktürk Sağlam, A. L. and Sert, S. (2012) Perceptions of in-service teachers regarding technology integrated English language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3 (3): 1-14.
9. Gray, K., Waycott, J., Clerehan, R., Hamilton, M., Richardson, J., Sheard, J. and Thompson, C. (2012) Worth it? Findings from a study of how academics assess students’ Web 2.0 activities. Research in Learning Technology, 20: 1-15.
10. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., and Winters, L. (1992) A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Ishtaiwa, F., and Dukmak, S. J. (2013) Do Web 2.0 applications enhance learning in teacher education in the UAE? An exploratory study. International Journal for Research in Education (IJRE), 33: 1-27.
12. Kessler, G. (2006) Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better? In P. Hubbard, and M. Levy (Eds.), Teacher education in CALL (pp. 23–42). John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
13. Kumar, S., and Vigil, K. (2010) Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on web 2.0 integration in teacher education courses. In: J. Sanchez and K. Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 1908-1913.
14. Oliver, K. (2007) Leveraging web 2.0 in the redesign of a graduate-level technology integration course. TechTrends, 51 (5): 55-61.
15. O’Reilly, T. (2007) What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation if software. Communications & Strategies, 65: 17-37.
16. Prensky, M. (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5): 1-15.
17. Solomon, G. and Schrum, L. (2007) Web 2.0 new tools, new schools. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
18. Warner, M., Steffen, C. and Cope, J. (2011) Raising the Bar for 21st Century Teacher Preparation. In: A. Cohan and A. Honigsfeld (eds.), Breaking the mold of preservice and inservice teacher education: Innovative and successful practices for the twenty-first century. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 35-44.