Microscale consolidation analysis of relaxation behavior of single living chondrocytes subjected to varying strain-rates

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 343-354

  Nguyen, Trung Dung ^a   Oloyede, Adekunle ^a   Singh, Sanjleena ^a   Gu, YuanTong ^b,c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b Australian ARC Future Fellow ^*  (Australia)

^c Laboratory for Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering and Science   (Australia)

Author keywords

AFM; Cell biomechanics; Consolidation theory; Strain rate dependent response

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BODY FLUIDS; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; STRESS RELAXATION;

AFM; CELL BIOMECHANICS; CONSOLIDATION THEORY; FLUID SOLID INTERACTION; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; INVERSE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; STRAIN-RATE-DEPENDENT; STRESS RELAXATION BEHAVIOR;

STRAIN RATE;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MEMBRANE; CYTOSKELETON; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOELASTICITY; ANIMAL; CELL SURVIVAL; CYTOLOGY; ELASTICITY; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; POROSITY; PRESSURE; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; CHONDROCYTES; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; POROSITY; PRESSURE; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84935896453     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alexopoulos L.G., et al. Osteoarthritic changes in the biphasic mechanical properties of the chondrocyte pericellular matrix in articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(3):509-517.
2. ABAQUS, 1996. ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual (version 5.6). Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, USA.
3. Baaijens F.P.T., et al. Large deformation finite element analysis of micropipette aspiration to determine the mechanical properties of the chondrocyte. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2005, 33(4):494-501.
4. Brown C.P., et al. Assessment of common hyperelastic constitutive equations for describing normal and osteoarthritic articular cartilage. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng..H: J. Eng. Med. 2009, 223(6):643-652.
5. Chahine N.O., et al. Effect of age and cytoskeletal elements on the indentation-dependent mechanical properties of chondrocytes. PloS One 2013, 8(4):e61651.
6. Chan E.P., et al. Spherical indentation testing of poroelastic relaxations in thin hydrogel layers. Soft Matter 2012, 8(5):1492-1498.
7. Cheng F., Unnikrishnan G.U., Reddy J.N. Micro-constituent based viscoelastic finite element analysis of biological cells. Int. J. App. Mech. 2010, 2(2):229-249.
8. Costa K.D. Single-cell elastography: probing for disease with the atomic force microscope. Dis. Markers 2004, 19(2):139-154.
9. Darling E.M., Zauscher S., Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of zonal articular chondrocytes measured by atomic force microscopy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2006, 14:571-579.
10. Darling E.M., et al. A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:1784-1791.
11. Darling E.M., et al. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J. Biomech. 2008, 41(2):454-464.
12. Dimitriadis E.K., et al. Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 2002, 82:2798-2810.
13. Evans E., Kukan B. Passive material behavior of granulocytes based on large deformation and recovery after deformation tests. Blood J. 1984, 64(5):1028-1035.
14. Evans E., Yeung A. Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys. J. 1989, 56(1):151-160.
15. Ewers B.J., et al. The extent of matrix damage and chondrocyte death in mechanically traumatized articular cartilage explants depends on rate of loading. J. Orthop. Res. 2001, 19:779-784.
16. Faria E.C., et al. Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM. Analyst 2008, 133:1498-1500.
17. Guilak F. The deformation behavior and viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes in articular cartilage. Biorheology 2000, 37:27-44.
18. Guilak F., Mow V.C. The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 2000, 33(12):1663-1673.
19. Guilak F., Erickson G.R., Ting-Beall H.P. The effects of osmotic stress on the viscoelastic and physical properties of articular chondrocytes. Biophys. J. 2002, 82:720-727.
20. Hu Y., et al. Poroelastic relaxation indentation of thin layers of gels. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110(8):086103.
21. Huang W., et al. Temporal effects of cell adhesion on mechanical characteristics of the single chondrocyte. J. Orthop. Res. 2003, 21(1):88-95.
22. Jiang H., Sun S.X. Cellular pressure and volume regulation and implications for cell mechanics. Biophys. J. 2013, 105(3):609-619.
23. Johnson K.L. Contact Mechanics 1987, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
24. Kaufmann M.V. Porohyperelastic analysis of large arteries including species transport and swelling effects. Mech. Eng. 1996, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ., in.
25. Kurz B., et al. Biosynthetic response and mechanical properties of articular cartilage after injurious compression. J. Orthop. Res. 2001, 19:1140-1146.
26. Kuznetsova T.G., et al. Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity. Micron 2007, 38:824-833.
27. Ladjal, H., et al., 2009. Atomic force microscopy-based single-cell indentation: experimentation and finite element simulation. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. St. Louis, MO, Univted States.
28. Lin D.C., Dimitriadis E.K., Horkay F. Elasticity of rubber-like materials measured by AFM nanoindentation. eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 2007, 1(9):576-584.
29. Lin D.C., et al. Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the Hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2009, 8(5):345-358.
30. Meroi E.A., Natali A.N., Schrefler B.A. A Porous media approach to finite deformation behaviour in soft tissues. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 2:157-170.
31. Moeendarbary E., et al. The cytoplasm of living cells behaves as a poroelastic material. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12(3):253-261.
32. Moo E.K., et al. Mechanical behaviour of in-situ chondrocytes subjected to different loading rates: a finite element study. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2012, 11:983-993.
33. Nguyen B.V., et al. Biomechanical properties of single chondrocytes and chondrons determined by micromanipulation and finite-element modelling. J. R. Soc. Interface 2010, 7(53):1723-1733.
34. Nguyen T.C. Mathematical Modelling of the Biomechanical Properties of Articular Cartilage 2005, Queensland University of Technology: Brisbane, Australia, School of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Medical Engineering.
35. Nguyen T.D., Gu Y.T. Exploration of mechanisms underlying the strain-rate-dependent mechanical property of single chondrocytes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104:1-5.
36. Nguyen T.D., Gu Y.T. Determination of strain-rate-dependent mechanical behavior of living and fixed osteocytes and chondrocytes using atomic force microscopy and inverse finite element analysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 2014, 136(10):101004.
37. Nguyen T.D., et al. Analysis of strain-rate dependent mechanical behavior of single chondrocyte: a finite element study. Int. J. Comput. Methods 2014, 11(Suppl. 1):S1-S20.
38. Nguyen T.D., Oloyede A., Gu Y.T. Stress relaxation analysis of single chondrocytes using porohyperelastic model based on AFM experiments. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 2014, 4(5):054001.
39. Nguyen T.D., Oloyede A. and Gu Y.T., A poroviscohyperelastic model for numerical analysis of mechanical behavior of single chondrocyte, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2015 Jan 15:1-11. (online). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2014.996875.
40. Oloyede A., Broom N. Stress-sharing between the fluid and solid components of articular cartilage under varying rates of compression. Connect. Tissue Res. 1993, 30(2):127.
41. Oloyede A., Flachsmann R., Broom N.D. The dramatic influence of loading velocity on the compressive response of articular cartilage. Connect. Tissue Res. 1992, 27:211-224.
42. Olsen S., Oloyede A. A finite element analysis methodology for representing the articular cartilage functional structure. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 5(6):377-386.
43. Quinn T.M., et al. Matrix and cell injury due to sub-impact loading of adult bovine articular cartilage explants: effects of strain rate and peak stress. J. Orthop. Res. 2001, 19:242-249.
44. Radin E.L., Paul I.L., LowY M. A comparison of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1970, 52(3):444-456.
45. Rico F., et al. Probing mechanical properties of living cells by atomic force microscopy with blunted pyramidal cantilever tips. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72(021914):1-10.
46. Sato M., et al. Application of the micropipette technique to the measurement of cultured porcine aortic endothelial cell viscoelastic properties. J. Biomech. Eng. 1990, 112(3):263-268.
47. Setton L.A., Zhu W., Mow V.C. The biphasic poroviscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage: role of the surface zone in governing the compressive behavior. J. Biomech. 1993, 26(4):581-592.
48. Sherwood J.D. Biot poroelasticity of a chemically active shale. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser A: Math. Phys. Sci. 1993, 440:365-377.
49. Shin D., Athanasiou K. Cytoindentation for obtaining cell biomechanical properties. J. Orthop. Res. 1999, 17(6):880-890.
50. Simon B.R. Multiphase poroelastic finite element models for soft tissue structures. Appl. Mech. Rev. 1992, 45(6):191-219.
51. Simon B.R., Gaballa M.A. Total Lagrangian 'porohyperelastic' finite element models of soft tissue undergoing finite strain.pdf. Advances in Bioengineering 1989, BED-vol 15:97-98. ASME, New York.
52. Simon B.R., et al. A Poroelastic finite element formulation including transport and swelling in soft tissue structures. J. Biomech. Eng. 1996, 118:1-9.
53. Simon B.R., et al. Porohyperelastic finite element analysis of large arteries using ABAQUS. J. Biomech. Eng. 1998, 120:296-298.
54. Simon B.R., et al. Identification and determination of material properties for porohyperelastic analysis of large arteries. J. Biomech. Eng. 120 1998, 188-194.
55. Sneddon I.N. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1965, 3(1):47-57.
56. Touhami A., Nysten B., Dufrene Y.F. Nanoscale mapping of the elasticity of microbial cells by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2003, 19:4539-4543.
57. Tran-Son-Tay R., et al. Time-dependent recovery of passive neutrophils after large deformation. Biophys. J. 1991, 60(4):856-866.
58. Trickey W.R., et al. Determination of the Poisson's ratio of the cell: recovery properties of chondrocytes after release from complete micropipette aspiration. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(1):78-87.
59. Wu J.Z., Herzog W. Finite element simulation of location- and time-dependent mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression tests. Ann. Biomedi. Eng. 2000, 28:318-330.
60. Wu J.Z., Herzog W. Analysis of the mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression tests for cyclic loading. J. Biomech. 2006, 39(4):603-616.
61. Yusuf K.Q., et al. A microanalytical study of the surfaces of normal, delipidized, and artificially "resurfaced" articular cartilage. Connect. Tissue Res. 2012, 53(3):236-245.
62. Zhang C.Y., Zhang Y.W. Effects of membrane pre-stress and intrinsic viscoelasticity on nanoindentation of cells using AFM. Philos. Mag. 2007, 87(23):3415-3435.
63. Zhou E.H., Martinez F.D., Fredberg J.J. Cell rheology: Mush rather than machine. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12(3):184-185.