Using the canary genome to decipher the evolution of hormone-sensitive gene regulation in seasonal singing birds

Genome Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Frankl Vilches, Carolina ^a   Kuhl, Heiner ^a,b   Werber, Martin ^b   Klages, Sven ^b   Kerick, Martin ^b   Bakker, Antje ^a   de Oliveira, Edivaldo H C ^c,d   Reusch, Christina ^a   Capuano, Floriana ^e   Vowinckel, Jakob ^e   Leitner, Stefan ^a   Ralser, Markus ^e,f   Timmermann, Bernd ^b   Gahr, Manfred ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTO EVANDRO CHAGAS   (Brazil)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE ISOENZYME 1; ANDROGEN; ESTROGEN; P21 ACTIVATED KINASE 3; ROUNDABOUT RECEPTOR; SLIT2 PROTEIN; TESTOSTERONE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GLI2; TRANSCRIPTOME; HORMONE; MESSENGER RNA; PROTEOME;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BRAIN REGION; CELL DENSITY; CELL SIZE; CONTIG MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENDRITE; ESTROGEN RESPONSIVE ELEMENT; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME ANALYSIS; HORMONE SENSITIVITY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; LONG INTERSPERSED REPEAT; LONG TERMINAL REPEAT; MALE; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVE FIBER; NONHUMAN; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN MOTIF; RNA SEQUENCE; SEASONAL VARIATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SERINUS; SERINUS CANARIA; SONGBIRD; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYNAPSE; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; CHROMOSOME; CPG ISLAND; DNA SEQUENCE; DRUG EFFECTS; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETICS; GENOME; KARYOTYPING; METABOLISM; NUCLEOTIDE REPEAT; SEASON; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; VOCALIZATION;

AVES; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CANARIES; CHROMOSOMES; CPG ISLANDS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE ONTOLOGY; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME; HORMONES; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; PROTEOME; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; RNA, MESSENGER; SEASONS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, RNA; TESTOSTERONE; TRANSCRIPTOME; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84935840605     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0578-9     Document Type: Article

References (137)

1. Aristotle BDMGAPAL. Historia animalium. London; Cambridge: MA: Heinemann: Harvard University Press; 1965.
2. Arnold AP. The effects of castration on song development in zebra finches (Poephila guttata). J Exp Zool. 1975;191:261-78.
3. Heid P, Güttinger HR, Pröve E. The influence of castration and testosterone replacement on the song architecture of canaries (Serinus canaria). Z Tierpsychol. 1985;69:224-36.
4. Kunc HP, Foerster K, Vermeirssen ELM, Kempenaers B. Experimentally elevated plasma testosterone levels Do Not influence singing behaviour of male blue tits (Parus caeruleus) during the early breeding season. Ethology. 2006;112:984-92.
5. Maney DL, Lange HS, Raees MQ, Reid AE, Sanford SE. Behavioral phenotypes persist after gonadal steroid manipulation in white-throated sparrows. Horm Behav. 2009;55:113-20.
6. Pinxten R, De Ridder E, Balthazart J, Eens M. Context-dependent effects of castration and testosterone treatment on song in male European starlings. Horm Behav. 2002;42:307-18.
7. Der PE. Einfluß von Kastration und Testosteronsubstitution auf das Sexualverhalten männlicher Zebrafinken (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis Gould). J Ornithol. 1974;115:338-47.
8. Prove E, Immelmann K. Behavioral and hormonal responses of male zebra finches to antiandrogens. Horm Behav. 1982;16:121-31.
9. Strand CR, Ross MS, Weiss SL, Deviche P. Testosterone and social context affect singing behavior but not song control region volumes in adult male songbirds in the fall. Behav Processes. 2008;78:29-37.
10. Van Hout AJ, Pinxten R, Darras VM, Eens M. Testosterone increases repertoire size in an open-ended learner: an experimental study using adult male European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Horm Behav. 2012;62:563-8.
11. Walters MJ, Collado D, Harding CF. Oestrogenic modulation of singing in male zebra finches: differential effects on directed and undirected songs. Anim Behav. 1991;42:445-52.
12. Leitner S, Voigt C, Garcia-Segura LM, Van't Hof T, Gahr M. Seasonal activation and inactivation of song motor memories in wild canaries is not reflected in neuroanatomical changes of forebrain song areas. Horm Behav. 2001;40:160-8.
13. Voigt C, Leitner S, Gahr M. Repertoire and structure of duet and solo songs in cooperatively breeding white-browed sparrow weavers. Behaviour. 2006;143:159-82.
14. Gahr M. How hormone-sensitive are bird songs and what are the underlying mechanisms? Acta Acustica united with Acustica. 2014;100:705-18.
15. Nottebohm F, Nottebohm ME, Crane LA, Wingfield JC. Seasonal changes in gonadal hormone levels of adult male canaries and their relation to song. Behav Neural Biol. 1987;47:197-211.
16. Voigt C, Leitner S. Seasonality in song behaviour revisited: Seasonal and annual variants and invariants in the song of the domesticated canary (Serinus canaria). Horm Behav. 2008;54:373-8.
17. Güttinger HR. Consequences of domestication on the song structures in the canary. Behaviour. 1985;94:254-78.
18. Fusani L, Metzdorf R, Hutchison JB, Gahr M. Aromatase inhibition affects testosterone-induced masculinization of song and the neural song system in female canaries. J Neurobiol. 2003;54:370-9.
19. Vallet E, Kreutzer M. Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases. Anim Behav. 1995;49:1603-10.
20. Gahr M, Metzdorf R. Distribution and dynamics in the expression of androgen and estrogen receptors in vocal control systems of songbirds. Brain Res Bull. 1997;44:509-17.
21. Gahr M, Flugge G, Guttinger HR. Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen-binding neurons in the songbird brain. Brain Res. 1987;402:173-7.
22. Gahr M. Localization of androgen receptors and estrogen receptors in the same cells of the songbird brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:9445-8.
23. Ball GF, Bernard DJ, Foidart A, Lakaye B, Balthazart J. Steroid sensitive sites in the avian brain: does the distribution of the estrogen receptor alpha and beta types provide insight into their function? Brain Behav Evol. 1999;54:28-40.
24. Nottebohm F, Stokes TM, Leonard CM. Central control of song in the canary. Serinus canarius. J Comp Neurol. 1976;165:457.
25. Wild JM. Functional neuroanatomy of the sensorimotor control of singing. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1016:438-62.
26. Gahr M. Delineation of a brain nucleus: comparisons of cytochemical, hodological, and cytoarchitectural views of the song control nucleus HVc of the adult canary. J Comp Neurol. 1990;294:30-6.
27. Nottebohm F. A brain for all seasons: cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei of the canary brain. Science. 1981;214:1368.
28. Kirn JR, Alvarez-Buylla A, Nottebohm F. Production and survival of projection neurons in a forebrain vocal center of adult male canaries. J Neurosci. 1991;11:1756.
29. Sartor JJ, Ball GF. Social suppression of song is associated with a reduction in volume of a song-control nucleus in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Behav Neurosci. 2005;119:233-44.
30. Goldman SA, Nottebohm F. Neuronal production, migration, and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus in the adult female canary brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80:2390.
31. Gnerre S, Maccallum I, Przybylski D, Ribeiro FJ, Burton JN, Walker BJ, et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1513-8.
32. McEwen BS, Davis PG, Parsons B, Pfaff DW. The brain as a target for steroid hormone action. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1979;2:65-112.
33. Arnold AP, Nottebohm F, Pfaff DW. Hormone concentrating cells in vocal control and other areas of the brain of the zebra finch (Poephila guttata). J Comp Neurol. 1976;165:487-511.
34. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schutz G, Umesono K, et al. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell. 1995;83:835-9.
35. Gahr M, Guttinger HR, Kroodsma DE. Estrogen receptors in the avian brain: survey reveals general distribution and forebrain areas unique to songbirds. J Comp Neurol. 1993;327:112-22.
36. Drnevich J, Replogle KL, Lovell P, Hahn TP, Johnson F, Mast TG, et al. Impact of experience-dependent and -independent factors on gene expression in songbird brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:17245-52.
37. Thompson CK, Meitzen J, Replogle K, Drnevich J, Lent KL, Wissman AM, et al. Seasonal changes in patterns of gene expression in avian song control brain regions. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35119.
38. International Chicken Genome Sequencing C. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004;432:695-716.
39. Dalloul RA, Long JA, Zimin AV, Aslam L, Beal K, Le Blomberg A, et al. Multiplatform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000475.
40. Huang Y, Li Y, Burt DW, Chen H, Zhang Y, Qian W, et al. The duck genome and transcriptome provide insight into an avian influenza virus reservoir species. Nat Genet. 2013;45:776-83.
41. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, Kunstner A, et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature. 2010;464:757-62.
42. Qu Y, Zhao H, Han N, Zhou G, Song G, Gao B, et al. Ground tit genome reveals avian adaptation to living at high altitudes in the Tibetan plateau. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2071.
43. Poelstra JW, Vijay N, Bossu CM, Lantz H, Ryll B, Muller I, et al. The genomic landscape underlying phenotypic integrity in the face of gene flow in crows. Science. 2014;344:1410-4.
44. Suh A, Paus M, Kiefmann M, Churakov G, Franke FA, Brosius J, et al. Mesozoic retroposons reveal parrots as the closest living relatives of passerine birds. Nat Commun. 2011;2:443.
45. Zhang G, Parker P, Li B, Li H, Wang J. The genome of Darwin's Finch (Geospiza fortis). GigaScience. 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100040.
46. Romanov MN, Dodgson JB, Gonser RA, Tuttle EM. Comparative BAC-based mapping in the white-throated sparrow, a novel behavioral genomics model, using interspecies overgo hybridization. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:211.
47. Hackett SJ, Kimball RT, Reddy S, Bowie RC, Braun EL, Braun MJ, et al. A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science. 2008;320:1763-8.
48. Genome sequence of the canary (Serinus canaria) http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ ena/data/search?query=GCA_000534875.
49. Ayers KL, Davidson NM, Demiyah D, Roeszler KN, Grutzner F, Sinclair AH, et al. RNA sequencing reveals sexually dimorphic gene expression before gonadal differentiation in chicken and allows comprehensive annotation of the W-chromosome. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R26.
50. Auer H, Mayr B, Lambrou M, Schleger W. An extended chicken karyotype, including the NOR chromosome. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1987;45:218-21.
51. Fritschi S, Stranzinger G. Fluorescent chromosome banding in inbred chicken: quinacrine bands, sequential chromomycin and Dapi bands. Theor Appl Genet. 1985;71:408-12.
52. Kaelbling M, Fechheimer NS. Synaptonemal complexes and the chromosome complement of domestic fowl, Gallus domesticus. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1983;35:87-92.
53. de Leon FA P, Li Y, Weng Z. Early and late replicative chromosomal banding patterns of Gallus domesticus. J Hered. 1992;83:36-42.
54. Ohno S, Stenius C, Christian LC, Becak W, Becak ML. Chromosomal uniformity in the avian subclass carinatae. Chromosoma. 1964;15:280-8.
55. Itoh Y, Arnold AP. Chromosomal polymorphism and comparative painting analysis in the zebra finch. Chromosome Res. 2005;13:47-56.
56. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996-1006.
57. Canary Genome Browser. http://public-genomes-ngs.molgen.mpg.de.
58. Hilliard Austin T, Miller Julie E, Fraley ER, Horvath S, White SA. Molecular microcircuitry underlies functional specification in a basal ganglia circuit dedicated to vocal learning. Neuron. 2012;73:537-52.
59. Kato M, Okanoya K. Molecular characterization of the song control nucleus HVC in Bengalese finch brain. Brain Res. 2010;1360:56-76.
60. Li X, Wang XJ, Tannenhauser J, Podell S, Mukherjee P, Hertel M, et al. Genomic resources for songbird research and their use in characterizing gene expression during brain development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:6834-9.
61. Lovell PV, Clayton DF, Replogle KL, Mello CV. Birdsong "transcriptomics": neurochemical specializations of the oscine song system. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3440.
62. Stevenson TJ, Replogle K, Drnevich J, Clayton DF, Ball GF. High throughput analysis reveals dissociable gene expression profiles in two independent neural systems involved in the regulation of social behavior. BMC Neurosci. 2012;13:126.
63. Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Hackl H, Charoentong P, Tosolini M, Kirilovsky A, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1091-3.
64. Hartog TE, Dittrich F, Pieneman AW, Jansen RF, Frankl-Vilches C, Lessmann V, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling in the HVC is required for testosterone-induced song of female canaries. J Neurosci. 2009;29:15511-9.
65. Balthazart J, Gahr M, Surlemont C. Distribution of estrogen receptors in the brain of the Japanese quail: an immunocytochemical study. Brain Res. 1989;501:205-14.
66. Fusani L, Van't Hof T, Hutchison JB, Gahr M. Seasonal expression of androgen receptors, estrogen receptors, and aromatase in the canary brain in relation to circulating androgens and estrogens. J Neurobiol. 2000;43:254-68.
67. Zhang C, Gao J, Zhang H, Sun L, Peng G. Robo2-slit and Dcc-netrin1 coordinate neuron axonal pathfinding within the embryonic axon tracts. J Neurosci. 2012;32:12589-602.
68. Byun J, Kim BT, Kim YT, Jiao Z, Hur EM, Zhou FQ. Slit2 inactivates GSK3beta to signal neurite outgrowth inhibition. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51895.
69. Ren D. Sodium leak channels in neuronal excitability and rhythmic behaviors. Neuron. 2011;72:899-911.
70. Chen L, Fu Y, Ren M, Xiao B, Rubin CS. A RasGRP, C. elegans RGEF-1b, couples external stimuli to behavior by activating LET-60 (Ras) in sensory neurons. Neuron. 2011;70:51-65.
71. Kressler D, Schreiber SN, Knutti D, Kralli A. The PGC-1-related protein PERC is a selective coactivator of estrogen receptor alpha. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:13918-25.
72. Li X, Zhu C, Tu WH, Yang N, Qin H, Sun Z. ZMIZ1 preferably enhances the transcriptional activity of androgen receptor with short polyglutamine tract. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25040.
73. Teramitsu I, Kudo LC, London SE, Geschwind DH, White SA. Parallel FoxP1 and FoxP2 expression in songbird and human brain predicts functional interaction. J Neurosci. 2004;24:3152-63.
74. Chen Q, Heston JB, Burkett ZD, White SA. Expression analysis of the speechrelated genes FoxP1 and FoxP2 and their relation to singing behavior in two songbird species. J Exp Biol. 2013;216:3682-92.
75. Schwanhausser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473:337-42.
76. Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, Rost H, Selevsek N, Reiter L, et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:O111 016717.
77. Vowinckel J, Capuano F, Campbell K, Deery MJ, Lilley KS, Ralser M. The beauty of being (label)-free: sample preparation methods for SWATH-MS and next-generation targeted proteomics. F1000 Res. 2013;2:272.
78. Kushner PJ, Agard DA, Greene GL, Scanlan TS, Shiau AK, Uht RM, et al. Estrogen receptor pathways to AP-1. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2000;74:311-7.
79. Porter W, Saville B, Hoivik D, Safe S. Functional synergy between the transcription factor Sp1 and the estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:1569-80.
80. Kim J, Larkin DM, Cai AQ, Zhang Y, Ge RL, et al. Reference-assisted chromosome assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:1785-90.
81. Kong L, Lovell PV, Heger A, Mello CV, Ponting CP. Accelerated evolution of PAK3- and PIM1-like kinase gene families in the zebra finch. Taeniopygia guttata. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27:1923-34.
82. Prufer K, Munch K, Hellmann I, Akagi K, Miller JR, Walenz B, et al. The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes. Nature. 2012;486:527-31.
83. Balthazart J, Foidart A, Wilson EM, Ball GF. Immunocytochemical localization of androgen receptors in the male songbird and quail brain. J Comp Neurol. 1992;317:407-20.
84. Nottebohm F. Testosterone triggers growth of brain vocal control nuclei in adult female canaries. Brain Res. 1980;189:429-36.
85. Sartor JJ, Balthazart J, Ball GF. Coordinated and dissociated effects of testosterone on singing behavior and song control nuclei in canaries (Serinus canaria). Horm Behav. 2005;47:467-76.
86. DeVoogd T, Nottebohm F. Gonadal hormones induce dendritic growth in the adult avian brain. Science. 1981;214:202-4.
87. Jansen R, Metzdorf R, van der Roest M, Fusani L, ter Maat A, Gahr M. Melatonin affects the temporal organization of the song of the zebra finch. FASEB J. 2005;19:848-50.
88. DeVoogd TJ. Endocrine mdulation of the development and adult function of the avian song system. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 1991;16:41-66.
89. Fusani L, Gahr M. Hormonal influence on song structure and organization: the role of estrogen. Neuroscience. 2006;138:939-46.
90. Meitzen J, Moore IT, Lent K, Brenowitz EA, Perkel DJ. Steroid hormones act transsynaptically within the forebrain to regulate neuronal phenotype and song stereotypy. J Neurosci. 2007;27:12045-57.
91. Fusani L, Van't Hof T, Hutchison JB. Season-related changes in circulating androgen, brain aromatase, and perch-calling in male ring doves. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003;130:142-7.
92. Metzdorf R, Gahr M, Fusani L. Distribution of aromatase, estrogen receptor, and androgen receptor mRNA in the forebrain of songbirds and nonsongbirds. J Comp Neurol. 1999;407:115-29.
93. Vellema M, Hertel M, Urbanus SL, Van der Linden A, Gahr M. Evaluating the predictive value of doublecortin as a marker for adult neurogenesis in canaries (Serinus canaria). J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:1299-315.
94. Lin Z, Reierstad S, Huang CC, Bulun SE. Novel estrogen receptor-alpha binding sites and estradiol target genes identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation cloning in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5017-24.
95. Nott SL, Huang Y, Li X, Fluharty BR, Qiu X, Welshons WV, et al. Genomic responses from the estrogen-responsive element-dependent signaling pathway mediated by estrogen receptor alpha are required to elicit cellular alterations. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:15277-88.
96. Stender JD, Kim K, Charn TH, Komm B, Chang KC, Kraus WL, et al. Genomewide analysis of estrogen receptor alpha DNA binding and tethering mechanisms identifies Runx1 as a novel tethering factor in receptormediated transcriptional activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:3943-55.
97. Güttinger H, Fuchs H, Schwager G. Das Gesangslernen und seine Beziehung zur Gehirnentwicklung beim Kanarienvogel (Serinus canaria). Die Vogelwarte. 1990;35:287-300.
98. Vellema M, Ko MC, Frankl-Vilches C, Gahr M. What makes a marker a good marker? Commentary on Balthazart J and Ball G (2014): Doublecortin is a highly valuable endogenous marker of adult neurogenesis in canaries. Brain Behav Evol 84:1-4. Brain Behav Evol. 2014;84:5-7.
99. Brenowitz EA. Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. Science. 1991;251:303-5.
100. Del Negro C, Kreutzer M, Gahr M. Sexually stimulating signals of canary (Serinus canaria) songs: evidence for a female-specific auditory representation in the HVc nucleus during the breeding season. Behav Neurosci. 2000;114:526-42.
101. Young LJ, Wang Z. The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:1048-54.
102. Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, Brown CG, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature. 2008;456:53-9.
103. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005;437:376-80.
104. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X, Shi Z, et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 2010;20:265-72.
105. Miller JR, Delcher AL, Koren S, Venter E, Walenz BP, Brownley A, et al. Aggressive assembly of pyrosequencing reads with mates. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2818-24.
106. Boetzer M, Henkel CV, Jansen HJ, Butler D, Pirovano W. Scaffolding pre-assembled contigs using SSPACE. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:578-9.
107. Kiełbasa SM, Wan R, Sato K, Horton P, Frith MC. Adaptive seeds tame genomic sequence comparison. Genome Res. 2011;21:487-93.
108. Reiner A, Perkel DJ, Mello CV, Jarvis ED. Songbirds and the revised avian brain nomenclature. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1016:77-108.
109. Grabherr MG, Russell P, Meyer M, Mauceli E, Alfoldi J, Di Palma F, et al. Genome-wide synteny through highly sensitive sequence alignment: Satsuma. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1145-51.
110. Saski M, Ikechi T, Makino S. A feather pulp culture technique for avian chromosomes, with notes on the chromosomes of the peafowl and the ostrich. Experientia. 1968;24:1292-3.
111. Gotoh O. A space-efficient and accurate method for mapping and aligning cDNA sequences onto genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:2630-8.
112. Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:637-44.
113. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674-6.
114. RepeatMasker. http://www.repeatmasker.org.
115. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562-78.
116. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403-10.
117. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106.
118. Anders S, Reyes A, Huber W. Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data. Genome Res. 2012;22:2008-17.
119. genomatix. http://www.genomatix.de.
120. Cohen CD, Lindenmeyer MT, Eichinger F, Hahn A, Seifert M, Moll AG, et al. Improved elucidation of biological processes linked to diabetic nephropathy by single probe-based microarray data analysis. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2937.
121. Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:207-10.
122. Expression data from Serinus canaria HVC, RA and Entopallium http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE50070.
123. Primer3web. http://primer3.wi.mit.edu.
124. Shevchenko G, Musunuri S, Wetterhall M, Bergquist J. Comparison of extraction methods for the comprehensive analysis of mouse brain proteome using shotgun-based mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:2441-51.
125. MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Shulman N, Chambers M, Finney GL, Frewen B, et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:966-8.
126. Cartharius K, Frech K, Grote K, Klocke B, Haltmeier M, Klingenhoff A, et al. MatInspector and beyond: promoter analysis based on transcription factor binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2933-42.
127. Michelhaugh SK, Lipovich L, Blythe J, Jia H, Kapatos G, Bannon MJ. Mining Affymetrix microarray data for long non-coding RNAs: altered expression in the nucleus accumbens of heroin abusers. J Neurochem. 2011;116:459-66.
128. Sharad S, Srivastava A, Ravulapalli S, Parker P, Chen Y, Li H, et al. Prostate cancer gene expression signature of patients with high body mass index. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2011;14:22-9.
129. Voigt C, Gahr M, Leitner S, Lutermann H, Bennett N. Breeding status and social environment differentially affect the expression of sex steroid receptor and aromatase mRNA in the brain of female Damaraland mole-rats. Front Zool. 2014;11:38.
130. Cline MS, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, Landys N, Workman C, et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:2366-82.
131. Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Lotia S, et al. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods. 2012;9:1069-76.
132. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498-504.
133. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL. Ideker. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:431-2.
134. ENA: Genome sequence of the canary (Serinus canaria). http://www.ebi.ac. uk/ena/data/view/PRJEB1766
135. European Nucleotide Archive. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/.
136. Transcriptome sequencing of Serinus Canaria and Taeniopygia guttata brain tissues. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJEB4463
137. Gene expression Omnibus. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.