The beauty of being (label)-free: Sample preparation methods for SWATH-MS and next-generation targeted proteomics

F1000Research

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Ralser, Markus ^a,b   Vowinckel, Jakob ^a   Capuano, Floriana ^a   Campbell, Kate ^a   Deery, Michael J ^a   Lilley, Kathryn S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENATURATION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; IN GEL DIGESTION; IN SOLUTION DIGESTION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPH; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETER; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRECIPITATION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84923163979     PISSN: 20461402     EISSN: 1759796X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.2-272.v2     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aebersold R Mann M: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422(6928):198-207. 12634793 10.1038/nature01511
2. Thakur SS Geiger T Chatterjee B: Deep and highly sensitive proteome coverage by LC-MS/MS without prefractionation. Mol Cell proteomics. 2011;10(8):M110.003699. 21586754 10.1074/mcp.M110.003699 3149084
3. Kocher T Pichler P Swart R: Analysis of protein mixtures from whole-cell extracts by single-run nanoLC-MS/MS using ultralong gradients. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(5):882-890. 22498708 10.1038/nprot.2012.036
4. Ong SE Mann M: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1(5):252-62. 16408053 10.1038/nchembio736
5. Tao WA Aebersold R: Advances in quantitative proteomics via stable isotope tagging and mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003;14(1):110-118. 12566010 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00018-6
6. Anderson L Hunter CL: Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5(4):573-88. 16332733 10.1074/mcp.M500331-MCP200
7. Wolen RL: The Application of Stable Isotopes to Studies of Drug Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;26(6):419-424. 3734130 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1986.tb03551.x
8. Ross PL Huang YN Marchese JN: Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell proteomics MCP. 2004;3(12):1154-1169. 15385600 10.1074/mcp.M400129-MCP200
9. Bluemlein K Ralser M: Monitoring protein expression in whole-cell extracts by targeted label- and standard-free LC-MS/MS. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(6):859-69. 21637204 10.1038/nprot.2011.333
10. Wang G Wu WW Zeng W: Label-free protein quantification using LC-coupled ion trap or FT mass spectrometry: Reproducibility, linearity, and application with complex proteomes. J Proteome Res. 2006;5(5):1214-1223. 16674111 10.1021/pr050406g
11. Silva JC Gorenstein MV Li GZ: Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol Cell proteomics. 2006;5(1):144-156. 16219938 10.1074/mcp.M500230-MCP200
12. Grossmann J Roschitzki B Panse C: Implementation and evaluation of relative and absolute quantification in shotgun proteomics with label-free methods. J Proteomics. 2010;73(9):1740-1746. 20576481 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.05.011
13. Griffin NM Yu J Long F: Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomic analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(1):83-9. 20010810 10.1038/nbt.1592 2805705
14. Zhu W Smith JW Huang CM: Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:840518. 19911078 10.1155/2010/840518 2775274
15. Krüger A Vowinckel J Mülleder M: Tpo1-mediated spermine and spermidine export controls cell cycle delay and times antioxidant protein expression during the oxidative stress response. EMBO Rep. 2013;14(12):1113-1119. advance on. 24136413 10.1038/embor.2013.165
16. Bluemlein K Ralser M: Monitoring protein expression in whole-cell extracts by targeted label- and standard-free LC-MS/MS. Nat Protoc. 2011;6(6):859-869. 21637204 10.1038/nprot.2011.333
17. Gillet LC Navarro P Tate S: Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(6):O111.016717. 22261725 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717 3433915
18. Ferreira-da-Silva F Pereira PJ Gales L: The crystal and solution structures of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase reveal different quaternary structures. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(44):33433-33440. 16963457 10.1074/jbc.M605267200
19. Kaiser P Meierhofer D Wang X: Tandem affinity purification combined with mass spectrometry to identify components of protein complexes. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;439:309-326. 18370112 10.1007/978-1-59745-188-8_21 3228642
20. Wisniewski JR Zougman A Nagaraj N: Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):359-362. 19377485 10.1038/nmeth.1322
21. Shevchenko G Musunuri S Wetterhall M: Comparison of extraction methods for the comprehensive analysis of mouse brain proteome using shotgun-based mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(4):2441-51. 22352882 10.1021/pr201169q
22. Von der Haar T: Optimized protein extraction for quantitative proteomics of yeasts. PLoS One. 2007;2(10):e1078. 17957260 10.1371/journal.pone.0001078 2031916
23. Andrews GL Simons BL Young JB: Performance characteristics of a new hybrid quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer (TripleTOF 5600). Anal Chem. 2011;83(13):5442-5446. 21619048 10.1021/ac200812d 3138073
24. Liu Y Hüttenhain R Surinova S: Quantitative Measurements of N-linked Glycoproteins in Human Plasma by SWATH-MS. Proteomics. 2013;13(8):1247-1256. 23322582 10.1002/pmic.201200417
25. Brachmann CB Davies A Cost GJ: Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998;14(2):115-132. 9483801 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2&<115::AID-YEA204&>3.0.CO;2-2
26. Mulleder M Capuano F Pir P: A prototrophic deletion mutant collection for yeast metabolomics and systems biology. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(12):1176-1178. 23222782 10.1038/nbt.2442 3520112
27. Kaiser P Meierhofer D Wang X: Genomics Protocols. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;439:1-16. 10.1007/978-1-59745-188-8
28. Gillet LC Navarro P Tate S: Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11(6):O111.016717. 22261725 10.1074/mcp.O111.016717 3433915
29. de Godoy LM Olsen JV Cox J: Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature. 2008;455(7217):1251-1254. 18820680 10.1038/nature07341
30. Cherry JM Hong EL Amundsen C: Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D700-5. 22110037 10.1093/nar/gkr1029 3245034
31. MacLean B Tomazela DM Shulman N: Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(7):966-968. 20147306 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054 2844992
32. Wisniewski JR Zougman A Nagaraj N: Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):359-362. 19377485 10.1038/nmeth.1322
33. Shevchenko G Musunuri S Wetterhall M: Comparison of extraction methods for the comprehensive analysis of mouse brain proteome using shotgun-based mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(4):2441-51. 22352882 10.1021/pr201169q
34. Vasilj A Gentzel M Ueberham E: Tissue proteomics by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis combined with label-free protein quantification. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(7):3680-3689. 22671763 10.1021/pr300147z
35. Burnette WN: Western blotting: electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate--polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal Biochem. 1981;112(2):195-203. 6266278 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5
36. Piersma SR Warmoes MO de Wit M: Whole gel processing procedure for GeLC-MS/MS based proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2013;11(1):17. 23617947 10.1186/1477-5956-11-17 3656797
37. Stover T Amari J Mazsaroff I: Novel characterization tool for Mab digestion-Technical note: RapiGest SF denaturant tool for improved trypsin digestion of monoclonal antibodies. Genet Eng News. 2003;1:1.
38. Goffeau A Barrell BG Bussey H: Life with 6000 genes. Science. 1996;274(5287): 546,563-567. 8849441 10.1126/science.274.5287.546
39. Washburn M Wolters D Yates J: Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(3):242-247. 11231557 10.1038/85686
40. Picotti P Lam H Campbell D: A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome. Nat Methods. 2008;5(11):913-914. 18974732 10.1038/nmeth1108-913 2770732
41. Picotti P Bodenmiller B Mueller LN: Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell. 2009;138(4):795-806. 19664813 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.051 2825542
42. Creasy DM Cottrell JS: Error tolerant searching of uninterpreted tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics. 2002;2(10):1426-34. 12422359 10.1002/1615-9861(200210)2:10&<1426::AID-PROT1426&>3.0.CO;2-5
43. Shilov IV Seymour SL Patel AA: The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell proteomics. 2007;6(9):1638-55. 17533153 10.1074/mcp.T600050-MCP200
44. Bernhardt O Selevsek N Gillet LC: Spectronaut: A fast and efficient algorithm for MRM-like processing of data independent acquisition (SWATH-MS) data. Biognosys.ch. Reference Source
45. Gerber SA Rush J Stemman O: Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(12):6940-6945. 12771378 10.1073/pnas.0832254100 165809
46. Thompson A Schäfer J Kuhn K: Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2003;75(8):1895-1904. 12713048 10.1021/ac0262560
47. Karp NA Huber W Sadowski PG: Addressing accuracy and precision issues in iTRAQ quantitation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010;9(9):1885-97. 20382981 10.1074/mcp.M900628-MCP200 2938101
48. Ow SY Salim M Noirel J: iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: the good, the bad and the ugly. J Proteome Res. 2009;8(11):5347-55. 19754192 10.1021/pr900634c
49. Ong SE Blagoev B Kratchmarova I: Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1(5):376-386. 12118079 10.1074/mcp.M200025-MCP200
50. Hebert AS Merrill AE Bailey DJ: Neutron-encoded mass signatures for multiplexed proteome quantification. Nat Methods. 2013;10(4):332-4. 23435260 10.1038/nmeth.2378 3612390
51. Wu CC MacCoss MJ Howell KE: Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Anal Chem. 2004;76(17):4951-4959. 15373428 10.1021/ac049208j
52. Piersma SR Warmoes MO de Wit M: Whole gel processing procedure for GeLC-MS/MS based proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2013;11(1):17. 23617947 10.1186/1477-5956-11-17 3656797
53. Schirle M Heurtier MA Kuster B: Profiling core proteomes of human cell lines by one-dimensional PAGE and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2003;2(12):1297-305. 14532353 10.1074/mcp.M300087-MCP200
54. Glatter T Ludwig C Ahrne E: Large-scale quantitative assessment of different in-solution protein digestion protocols reveals superior cleavage efficiency of tandem Lys-C/trypsin proteolysis over trypsin digestion. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(11):5145-56. 23017020 10.1021/pr300273g
55. Wisniewski JR Zielinska DF Mann M: Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method. Anal Biochem. 2011;410(2):307-9. 21144814 10.1016/j.ab.2010.12.004