Empirical agent-based land market: Integrating adaptive economic behavior in urban land-use models

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 54, Issue , 2015, Pages 397-413

  Filatova, Tatiana ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELTARES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agent based; Amenities; Flood risk; Hedonic model; Housing market; Price expectations

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMMERCE; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COSTS; ECONOMICS; FLOODS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HOUSING; LAND USE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AGENT BASED; AMENITIES; FLOOD RISKS; HEDONIC MODEL; HOUSING MARKETS; PRICE EXPECTATIONS;

SOFTWARE AGENTS;

EID: 84935031135     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acemoglu D., Ozdaglar A. Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dynamic Games and Applications 2011, 1(1):3-49.
2. Alonso W. Location and land use 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. An L. Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 2012, 229:25-36.
4. Arthur W.B., Durlauf S.N., Lane D. The economy as an evolving complex system II. Santa Fe institute studies in the science of complexity 1997, Vol. XXVII. Addison-Wesley.
5. Balmann, A., & Happe, K. (2000). Applying parallel genetic algorithms to economic problems: The case of agricultural land markets. In "Microbehavior and Macroresults", IIFET 2000 Proceedings. Corvallis, Oregon USA.
6. Benenson I. Multi-agent simulations of residential dynamics in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 1998, 22(1):25-42.
7. Bin O., Kruse J.B., Landry C.E. Flood hazards, insurance rates, and amenities: Evidence from the coastal housing market. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 2008, 75(1):63-82.
8. Boero R., Squazzoni F. Does empirical embeddedness matter? Methodological issues on agent-based models for analytical social science. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2005, 8(4).
9. Brown D.G., Robinson D.T. Effects of heterogeneity in residential preferences on an agent-based model of urban sprawl. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1). art.46.
10. Brown D.G., Robinson D.T., An L., Nassauer J.I., Zellner M., Rand W., et al. Exurbia from the bottom-up: Modeling multiple actors and their landscape interactions. Geoforum 2008, 39(2):805-818.
11. Contini B., Leombruni R., Richiardi M. Exploring a new ExpAce: The complementarities between experimental economics and agent-based computational economics. Journal of Social Complexity 2007, 3(1):13-22.
12. Dawson R.J., Peppe R., Wang M. An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management. Natural Hazards 2011, 59:167-189.
13. Duffy J. Agent-based models and human subject experiments. Handbook of computational economics volume 2: Agent-based computational economics 2006, 949-1011. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam. L. Tesfatsion, K.L. Judd (Eds.).
14. Ettema D. A multi-agent model of urban processes: Modelling relocation processes and price setting in housing markets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35:1-11.
15. Ettema D.F., Arentze T.A., Timmermans H.J.P. Social influences on household location, mobility and activity choice in integrated micro-simulation models. Transportation Research. Part A: Policy and Practice 2011, 45(4):283-295.
16. Evans T.P., Sun W.J., Kelley H. Spatially explicit experiments for the exploration of land-use decision-making dynamics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2006, 20(9):1013-1037.
17. Filatova T., Bin O. Changing climate, changing behavior: Adaptive economic behavior and housing markets responses to flood risks. Advances in social simulation 2013, Vol. 229:249-259. Springer, Berlin.
18. Filatova T., Parker D., van der Veen A. Agent-based urban land markets: Agent's pricing behavior, land prices and urban land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2009, 12(1):3.
19. Filatova T., Parker D.C., van der Veen A. The implications of skewed risk perception for a dutch coastal land market: Insights from an agent-based computational economics model. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 2011, 40(3):405-423.
20. Filatova T., van der Veen A., Parker D. Land market interactions between heterogeneous agents in a heterogeneous landscape-tracing the macro-scale effects of individual trade-offs between environmental amenities and disamenities. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2009, 57(4):431-459.
21. Filatova T., Verburg P.H., Parker D.C., Stannard C.A. Spatial agent-based models for socio-ecological systems: Challenges and prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software 2013, 45:1-7.
22. Frame D.E. Housing, natural hazards, and insurance. Journal of Urban Economics 1998, 44(1):93-109.
23. Geoghegan J., Wainger L.A., Bockstael N.E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological economics 1997, 23:251-264.
24. Gilbert, N., Hawksworth, J. C., & Swinney, P. A. (2009). An agent-based model of the English housing market. In Association for the advancement of artificial intelligence spring symposium series. Stanford, California: The AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, March 23-25, 2009.
25. Grimm V., Berger U., DeAngelis D.L., Polhill J.G., Giske J., Railsback S.F. The ODD protocol a review and first update. Ecological Modelling 2010, 221(23):2760-2768.
26. Heckbert, S., & Smajgl, A. (2005). Analysing urban systems using agent-based modelling. In MODSIM 2005 international congress on modelling and simulation "advances and applications for management and decision making". Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand.
27. Heckbert S. Agent-based modelling of emissions trading for coastal landscapes in transition. Journal of Land Use Science 2011, 6(2-3):137-150.
28. Heckbert S., Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Hanneman D. Cumulative effects and emergent properties of multiple-use natural resources. Multi-Agent-Based Simulation X 2010, 5683:1-13.
29. Heckbert, S., & Bishop, I. (2011). Empirical calibration of spatially explicit agent-based models. In D. Marceau, & I. Benenson (Eds.), Advanced Geosimulation (pp. 92-110). Bentham.
30. Heckbert S., Baynes T., Reeson A. Agent-based modeling in ecological economics. Ecological Economics Reviews 2010, 1185:39-53.
31. Huang Q., Parker D.C., Filatova T., Sun S. A review of urban residential choice models using agent-based modeling. Environment and Planning: B 2013, 40.
32. Huang Q., Parker D.C., Sun S., Filatova T. Effects of agent heterogeneity in the presence of a land-market: A systematic test in an agent-based laboratory. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2013, 41:188-203.
33. Irwin E.G., Bockstael N.E. Interacting agents, spatial externalities and the evolution of residential land use patterns. Journal of Economic Geography 2002, 2:31-54.
34. Janssen M.A., Holahan R., Lee A., Ostrom E. Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science 2010, 328(5978):613-617.
35. Janssen M.A., Jager W. Fashions, habits and changing preferences: Simulation of psychological factors affecting market dynamics. Journal of Economic Psychology 2001, 22(6):745-772.
36. Janssen M.A., Ostrom E. Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2).
37. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-292.
38. Kirman A.P., Vriend N.J. Evolving market structure: An ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2001, 25:459-502.
39. LeBaron B. Agent-based computational finance. Handbook of computational economics volume 2: Agent-based computational economics 2006, 1187-1233. Elsevier B.V. L. Tesfatsion, K.L. Judd (Eds.).
40. Magliocca N., Safirova E., McConnell V., Walls M. An economic agent-based model of coupled housing and land markets (CHALMS). Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35(3):183-191.
41. Matthews R.B., Gilbert N.G., Roach A., Polhill J.G., Gotts N.M. Agent-based land-use models: A review of applications. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:1447-1459.
42. Miller E., Hunt J.D., Abraham J.E., Salvini P.A. Microsimulating urban systems. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 2004, 28:9-44.
43. Mueller B., Bohn F., Dreßler G., Groeneveld J.r., Klassert C., Martin R., et al. Describing human decisions in agent-based models-ODD+D an extension of the ODD protocol. Environmental Modelling & Software 2013, 48(37-48).
44. Parker, D. C., Berger, T., & Manson, S. M. (Eds.). (2002). Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change: Report and review of an international workshop. LUCC Report Series Bloomington, LUCC, October 4-7, 2001.
45. Parker, D. C., Brown, D. G. Filatova, T., Riolo, R., Robinson, D. T., Sun, S. (2011). Do land markets matter? A modeling ontology and experimental design to test the effects of land markets for an agent-based model of ex-urban residential land-use change. In A. J. Heppenstall, A. T. Crooks, L. M. See, & M. Batty (Eds.), Agent-based models of geographical systems (pp. 525-542). Dordrecht: Springer. (accessed 06.01.14). http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/ABM.pdf.
46. Parker D.C., Filatova T. A conceptual design for a bilateral agent-based land market with heterogeneous economic agents. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2008, 32(6):454-463.
47. Plantinga A.J., Lewis D.J. Landscape simulations with econometric-based land-use models. Oxford handbook of land economics 2014, Oxford University Press. J. Wu, J.M. Duke (Eds.).
48. Poggio T., Lo A.W., LeBaron B., Chan N.T. Agent-based models of financial markets: A comparison with experimental markets 1999, MIT Working Paper.
49. Polhill, G., Dawson, T., Parker, D. C., Jin, X., Robinson, K., Filatova, T., et al. (2014). Towards metadata standards for sharing simulation outputs. In Social simulation conference (ESSA 2014). Barcelona, Spain (4p).
50. Robinson D.T., Brown D., Parker D.C., Schreinemachers P., Janssen M.A., Huigen M., et al. Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science. Journal of Land Use Science 2007, 2(1):31-55.
51. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 1974, 82(1):34-55.
52. Schreinemachers P., Berger T. An agent-based simulation model of human environment interactions in agricultural systems. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26:845-859.
53. Sheppard S. Hedonic analysis of housing markets. Handbook of regional and urban economics 1999, 1596-1635. Elsevier Science B.V. E.S. Mills, P. Cheshire (Eds.).
54. Simon H. Models of bounded rationality. Emperically grounded economic reason 1997, Vol. 3. MIT Press.
55. Smajgl A., Brown D.G., Valbuena D., Huigen M.G.A. Empirical characterisation of agent behaviours in socio-ecological systems. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26(7):837-844.
56. Stern N. The economics of climate change: The stern review 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
57. Sun S., Parker D.C., Huang Q., Filatova T., Robinson D.T., Riolo R.L., et al. Market impacts on land-use change: An agent-based experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2014, 104(3):460-484.
58. Tesfatsion L., Judd K.L. Handbook of computational economics volume II: agent-based computational economics 2006, Elsevier B.V.
59. Tesfatsion L. Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. Handbook of computational economics volume 2: Agent-based computational economics 2006, 831-880. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam. L. Tesfatsion, K.L. Judd (Eds.).
60. Thiele J.C., Grimm V. NetLogo meets R: Linking agent-based models with a toolbox for their analysis. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(8):972-974.
61. Valbuena D., Verburg P.H., Bregt A.K. A method to define a typology for agent-based analysis in regional land-use research. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 2008, 128(1-2):27-36.
62. van Delden H., Luja P., Engelen G. Integration of multi-scale dynamic spatial models of socio-economic and physical processes for river basin management. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22:223-238.
63. Verburg P.H., de Koning G.H.J., Kok K., Veldkamp A., Bouma J. A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use. Ecological Modelling 1999, 116:45-61.
64. Voinov A. Systems science and modeling for ecological economics 2008, Elsevier, Academic Print, London - Burlington - San Diego.
65. Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.
66. Windrum P., Fagiolo G., Moneta A. Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 2007, 10(2).
67. Wu J. Environmental amenities and the spatial pattern of urban sprawl. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2001, 83(3):691-697.
68. Wu J.J. Environmental amenities, urban sprawl, and community characteristics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 52(2):527-547.
69. Wu J., Plantinga A.J. The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 46(2):288-309.
70. Yin L., Muller B. Residential location and the biophysical environment: Excurban development agents in a heterogeneous landscape. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 2007, 34(2):279-295.