An economic agent-based model of coupled housing and land markets (CHALMS)

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 183-191

  Magliocca, Nicholas ^a   Safirova, Elena ^b   McConnell, Virginia ^a,b   Walls, Margaret ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

^b RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; Coupled markets; Housing density; Housing markets; Land markets; Price expectations

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED MODELING; COUPLED MARKETS; HOUSING DENSITY; HOUSING MARKETS; LAND MARKETS; PRICE EXPECTATIONS;

COMMERCE; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COSTS; LAND USE; POPULATION STATISTICS; RANDOM PROCESSES; STOCHASTIC MODELS; URBAN PLANNING;

HOUSING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; HOUSING PROJECT; LAND MARKET; LAND USE; LAND USE CHANGE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRICE DYNAMICS; STOCHASTICITY; SUBURBAN AREA; SUBURBANIZATION; URBAN ECONOMY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 79953756063     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alonso W. Location and land use 1964, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Anas A., Arnott R.J. Dynamic housing market equilibrium with taste heterogeneity, idiosyncratic perfect foresight, and stock conversions. Journal of Housing Economics 1991, 1:2-32.
3. Arthur, W. B. (1994). The El Farol Problem. In Amer. Econ. Assoc. Papers and Proc. (Vol. 84, p. 406).
4. Arthur W.B. Out-of-equilibrium economics and agent-based modeling. Handbook of computational economics: Agent-based computational economics 2006, 1551-1564. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam. L. Tesfatsion, K.L. Judd (Eds.).
5. Arthur W.B., Durlauf S.N., Lane D. The economy as an evolving complex system II. Santa Fe institute studies in the science of complexity (XXVII) 1997, Addison, Wesley.
6. Axtell R. The complexity of exchange. Economic Journal 2005, 115(504):F193-F210.
7. Benenson I., Torrens P. Geosimulation: Automata-based modeling of urban phenomena 2004, John Wiley and Sons, London.
8. Brown D.G., Page S., Riolo R., Zellner M., Rand W. Path dependence and the validation of agent-based spatial models of land use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2005, 19(2):153-174.
9. Brueckner J., Fansler D. The economics of urban sprawl: Theory and evidence on the spatial sizes of cities. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1983, 65(3):479-482.
10. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2007). Average cost of owning and operating an automobilea (assuming 15,000 vehicle-miles per year. Research and Innovative Technology Administration. http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_03_14.html.
11. Capozza D., Helsley R. The stochastic city. Journal of Urban Economics 1990, 28(2):187-203.
12. Epple D., Sieg H. Estimating equilibrium models of local jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy 1999, 107(4):645-681.
13. Ettema D. A multi-agent model of urban processes: Modeling relocation processes and price setting in housing markets. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 2010, 35(1):1-11.
14. Fernandez L.E., Brown D.G., Marans R.W., Nassauer J.I. Characterizing location preferences in an exurban population: Implications for agent-based modeling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2005, 32(6):799-820.
15. Filatova, T., Parker, D. C., & van der Veen, A. (2007). Agent-based land markets: Heterogeneous agents, land prices, and urban land use change. Proceedings of the 4th conference of the European social simulation associations (ESSA'07), Toulouse, France.
16. Filatova, T., Parker, D. C., & van derVeen, A. (2009). Agent-based urban land markets: Agent's pricing behavior, land prices and urban land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(13). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/3.html.
17. Fodor E. The real cost of growth in Oregon. Population and Environment 1997, 18(4).
18. Frank J.E. The costs of alternative development patterns: A review of the literature 1989, Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC.
19. Heimlich, R., & Anderson, W. (2001). Development at the urban fringe and beyond: Impacts on agriculture and rural land. Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economic Report No. 803.
20. Irwin E. New directions for urban economic models of land use change: Incorporating spatial heterogeneity and transitional dynamics. Journal of Regional Science 2010, 50(1):65-91.
21. Irwin E., Bockstael N. Interacting agents, spatial externalities, and the evolution of residential land use patterns. Journal of Economic Geography 2002, 2:31-54.
22. Kirman A.P. Whom or what does the representative individual represent?. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1992, 6(2):117-136.
23. Ligtenberg A., Wachowicz M., Bregt A.K., Beulens A., Kettenis D.L. A design and application of a multi-agent system for simulation of multi-actor spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Management 2004, 72:43-55.
24. Manson S.M. Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum 2001, 32:405-415.
25. McNamara D.E., Werner B.T. Coupled barrier island-resort model: 1. Emergent instabilities induced by strong human-landscape interactions. Journal of Geophysical Research - Earth Surface 2008, 113(F1):F01016.
26. Mills E.S. Urban economics 1972, Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL.
27. Muth R.F. Cities and housing 1969, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
28. Otter, H. S., van der Veen, A., & de Vriend, H. J. (2001). ABLOoM: Location behavior, spatial patterns, and agent-based modeling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4(4)2. http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/jasss/4/4/2.html.
29. Parker D.C., Filatova T. A conceptual design for a bilateral agent-based land market with heterogeneous economic agents. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2008, 32:454-463.
30. Parker D.C., Manson S.M., Janssen M.A., Hoffmann M., Deadman P. Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: A review. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2003, 93(2):314-337.
31. Robinson D.T., Brown D.G. Evaluating the effects of land-use development policies on ex-urban forest cover: An integrated agent-based GIS approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2009, 23(9):1211-1232.
32. Tesfatsion L. Agent-based computational economics: A constructive approach to economic theory. Handbook of computational economics: Agent-Based computational economics (II) 2006, 831-880. Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam. L. Tesfatsion, K.L. Judd (Eds.).
33. Tesfatsion L., Judd K.L. Handbook of computational economics: Agent-based computational economics (II) 2006, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam.
34. Veldkamp A., Verburg P.H. Modelling land use change and environmental impact. Journal of Environmental Management 2004, 72:1-3.
35. Walsh R. Endogenous open space amenities in a locational equilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics 2007, 61:319-344.
36. Wheaton William.C. A comparative static analysis of urban spatial structure. Journal of Economic Theory 1974, 9:223-237.
37. Wu J., Plantinga A.J. The influence of public open space of urban spatial structure. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 46(2):288-309.