Characteristics and temporal evolution of particulate emissions from a ship diesel engine

Applied Energy

Volumn 155, Issue , 2015, Pages 204-217

  Mueller, Laarnie ^a,b,c   Jakobi, Gert ^a,b,c   Czech, Hendryk ^b   Stengel, Benjamin ^c,d   Orasche, Juergen ^a,b,c   Arteaga Salas, Jose M ^a,c   Karg, Erwin ^a,b,c   Elsasser, Michael ^a,b,g   Sippula, Olli ^c,e   Streibel, Thorsten ^a,b,c   Slowik, Jay G ^f   Prevot, Andre S H ^f   Jokiniemi, Jorma ^c,e   Rabe, Rom ^d   Harndorf, Horst ^d   Michalke, Bernhard ^a   Schnelle Kreis, Juergen ^a   Zimmermann, Ralf ^a,b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

^c Helmholtz Virtual Institute of Complex Molecular Systems in Environmental Health (HICE)   (Germany)

^d Department of Piston Machines and Internal Combustion Engines ^*  (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^f PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^g DEUTSCHER WETTERDIENST   (Germany)

Author keywords

Black carbon; Diesel fuel; Heavy fuel oil; Organic matter; Particulate matter; Ship emission

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; DIESEL ENGINES; DIESEL FUELS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FUEL OILS; GASES; HYDROCARBONS; MARINE ENGINES; MASS SPECTROMETRY; RESIDUAL FUELS; SHIPS;

AEROSOL MASS SPECTROMETRY; BLACK CARBON; EXHAUST TEMPERATURE; INDIRECT MEASUREMENTS; OXYGENATED HYDROCARBON; PARTICULATE MATTER; SHIP EMISSIONS; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION;

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

BLACK CARBON; DIESEL ENGINE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXHAUST EMISSION; FILTER; HYDROCARBON; INORGANIC COMPOUND; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; ORGANIC MATTER; OXYGEN; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLICY MAKING; SULFUR; TEMPORAL EVOLUTION;

EID: 84934972478     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.115     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Blasco J., Durán-Grados V., Hampel M., Moreno-Gutiérrez J. Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of emissions from ships' propulsion systems. Environ Int 2014, 66:44-47.
2. Corbett J.J., Winebrake J.J., Green E.H., Kasibhatla P., Eyring V., Lauer A. Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41:8512-8518.
3. Eyring V., Isaksen I.S.A., Berntsen T., Collins W.J., Corbett J.J., Endresen O., et al. Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: shipping. Atmos Environ 2010, 44:4735-4771.
4. Johansson L., Jalkanen J.P., Kalli J., Kukkonen J. The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of regulation changes in the northern EU area. Atmos Chem Phys 2013, 13(22):11375-11389. 10.5194/acp-13-11375-2013.
5. Shipping 2020; Executive summary, DNV, Norway, June 2012. . http://www.dnv.com.
6. Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (Revised MARPOL Annex VI). MEPC.176(58) . http://www.imo.org.
7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council ENV 720. A European Union strategy to reduce atmospheric emissions from seagoing ships. Brussels; 2003. . http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/031222_ship_emissions_council.pdf.
8. Browning L., Hartley S., Bandemehr A., Gathright K., Miller W. Demonstration of fuel switching on oceangoing vessels in the Gulf of Mexico. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2012, 62(9):1093-1101.
9. Psaraftis H.N., Kontovas C.A. Balancing the economic and environmental performance of maritime transportation. Transport Res D-TR E 2010, 15(8):458-462. 10.1016/j.trd.2010.05.001.
10. Alföldy B., Lööv J.B., Lagler F., Mellqvist J., Berg N., Beecken J., et al. Measurements of air pollution emission factors for marine transportation in SECA. Atmos Meas Tech 2013, 6(7):1777-1791. 10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013.
11. Walsh C., Bows A. Size matters: exploring the importance of vessel characteristics to inform estimates of shipping emissions. Appl Energy 2012, 98:128-137. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.015.
12. Cooper D.A. Exhaust emissions from high speed passenger ferries. Atmos Environ 2001, 35(24):4189-4200. 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00192-3.
13. Cooper D.A. Exhaust emissions from ships at berth. Atmos Environ 2003, 37(27):817-3830. [3]. 10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00446-1.
14. Sarvi A., Fogelholm C.J., Zevenhoven R. Emission from large-scale medium-speed diesel engine: 2. Influence of fuel type and operating mode. Fuel Process Technol 2008, 89:520-527. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.10.005.
15. Petzold A., Weingartner E., Hasselbach J., Lauer P., Kurok C., Fleischer F. Physical properties, chemical composition, and cloud forming potential of particulate emissions from a marine diesel engine at various load conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44(10):3800-3805. 10.1021/es903681z.
16. Sippula O., Stengel B., Sklorz M., Streibel T., Rabe R., Orasche J., et al. Particle emissions from a marine engine: chemical composition and aromatic emission profiles under various operating conditions. Environ Sci Technol 2014, 48:11721-11729.
17. Moldanova J., Fridell E., Winnes H., Holmin-Fridell S., Boman J., Jedynska A., et al. Physical and chemical characterisation of PM emissions from two ships operating in European Emission Control Areas. Atmos Meas Tech 2013, 6(12):3577-3596. 10.5194/amt-6-3577-2013.
18. Hountalas D.T., Papagiannakis R.G., Zovanos G., Antonopoulos A. Comparative evaluation of various methodologies to account for the effect of load variation during cylinder pressure measurement of large scale two-stroke diesel engines. Appl Energy 2014, 113:1027-1042. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.036.
19. Kowalski J. Concept of the multidimensional diagnostic tool based on exhaust gas composition for marine engines. Appl Energy 2015, 150:1-8. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.013.
20. Agrawal H., Welch W.A., Miller J.W., Cocker D.R. Emission measurements from a crude oil tanker at sea. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42(19):7098-7103. 10.1021/es703102y.
21. Healy R.M., O'Connor I.P., Hellebust S., Allanic A., Sodeau J.R., Wenger J.C. Characterisation of single particles from in-port ship emissions. Atmos Environ 2009, 43(40):6408-6414.
22. Moldanova J., Fridell E., Popovicheva O., Demirdjian B., Tishkova V., Faccinetto A., et al. Characterisation of particulate matter and gaseous emissions from a large ship diesel engine. Atmos Environ 2009, 43(16):2632-2641. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.02.008.
23. Viana M., Amato F., Alastuey A., Querol X., Moreno T., García Dos Santos S., et al. Chemical tracers of particulate emissions from commercial shipping. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43(19):7472-7477.
24. Lu G., Brook J.R., Rami Alfarra M., Anlauf K., Richard Leaitch W., Sharma S., et al. Identification and characterization of inland ship plumes over Vancouver, BC. Atmos Environ 2006, 40(15):2767-2782. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.054.
25. Mauderly J.L., Chow J.C. Health effects of organic aerosols. Inhal Toxicol 2008, 20:257-288. 10.1080/08958370701866008.
26. Krivoshto B.A., Richards J.R., Albertson T.E., Derlet R.W. The toxicity of diesel exhaust: implications for primary care. J Am Bd Fam Med 2008, 21(1):55-62. 10.3122/jabfm.2008.01.070139.
27. Radischat C., Sippula O., Stengel B., Klingbeil S., Sklorz M., Rabe R., et al. Real-time analysis of organic compounds in ship engine aerosol emissions using resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionisation and proton transfer mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015, 1-13. 10.1007/s00216-015-8465-0.
28. Rüger C., Sklorz M., Schwemer T., Zimmermann R. Characterisation of ship diesel primary particulate matter at the molecular level by means of ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry coupled to laser desorption ionisation-comparison of feed fuel, filter extracts and direct particle measurements. Anal Bioanal Chem 2015, 1-15. 10.1007/s00216-014-8408-1.
29. Reda A.A., Schnelle-Kreis J., Orasche J., Abbaszade G., Lintelmann J., Arteaga-Salas J.M., et al. Gas phase carbonyl compounds in ship emissions: differences between diesel fuel and heavy fuel oil operation. Atmos Environ 2014, (94):467-478. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.053.
30. Winebrake J.J., Corbett J.J., Green E.H., Lauer A., Eyring V. Mitigating the health impacts of pollution from oceangoing shipping: an assessment of low-sulfur fuel mandates. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43(13):4776-4782. 10.1021/es803224q.
31. Winnes H., Fridell E. Particle emissions from ships: dependence on fuel type. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2009, 59(12):1391-1398. 10.3155/1047-3289.59.12.1391.
32. Lack D.A., Corbett J.J. Black carbon from ships: a review of the effects of ship speed, fuel quality and exhaust gas scrubbing. Atmos Chem Phys 2012, 12:3985-4000. 10.5194/acp-12-3985-2012.
33. Matthias V., Bewersdorff I., Aulinger A., Quante M. The contribution of ship emissions to air pollution in the North Sea regions. Environ Pollut 2010, 158(6):2241-2250. 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.02.013.
34. Beecken J., Mellqvist J., Salo K., Ekholm J., Jalkanen J.P. Airborne emission measurements of SO2, NOx and particles from individual ships using a sniffer technique. Atmos Meas Tech 2014, 7(7):1957-1968. 10.5194/amt-7-1957-2014.
35. Raptotasios SI, Sakellaridis NF, Papagiannakis RG, Hountalas DT. Application of a multi-zone combustion model to investigate the NOx reduction potential of two-stroke marine diesel engines using EGR. Appl Energy; 2015 [in press]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.041.
36. 2: DOAS measurements from airborne platforms. Atmos Meas Tech 2012, 5(5):1085-1098. 10.5194/amt-5-1085-2012.
37. Balzani Lööv J.M., Alfoldy B., Gast L.F.L., Hjorth J., Lagler F., Mellqvist J., et al. Field test of available methods to measure remotely SOx and NOx emissions from ships. Atmos Meas Tech 2014, 7(8):2597-2613. 10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014.
38. Pirjola L., Pajunoja A., Walden J., Jalkanen J.P., Rönkkö T., Kousa A., et al. Mobile measurements of ship emissions in two harbour areas in Finland. Atmos Meas Tech 2014, 7(1):149-161. 10.5194/amt-7-149-2014.
39. Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Chen L.W.A., Chang M.C.O., Robinson N.F., Trimble D., et al. The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 2007, 57(9):1014-1023. 10.3155/1047-3289.57.9.1014.
40. Drinovec L., Močnik G., Zotter P., Prévôt A.S.H., Ruckstuhl C., Coz E., et al. The "dual-spot" Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation. Atmos Meas Tech Discuss 2014, 7(9):10179-10220.
41. Kirchstetter T.W., Novakov T., Hobbs P.V. Evidence that the spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon. J Geophys Res 2004, 109:D21208. 10.1029/2004JD0004999.
42. DeCarlo P.F., Kimmel J.R., Trimborn A., Jayne J.T., Aiken A.C., Gonin M., et al. A field-deployable high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer. Anal Chem 2006, 78(24):8281-8289. 10.1021/ac061249n.
43. Aiken A.C., DeCarlo P.F., Kroll J.H., Worsnop D.R., Huffman J.A., Docherty K.S., et al. O/C and OM/OC ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-Resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42(12):4478-4485.
44. Jayaram V., Agrawal H., Welch W.A., Miller J.W., Cocker D.R. Real-time gaseous, PM and ultrafine particle emissions from a modern marine engine operating on biodiesel. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45(6):2286-2292.
45. Kroll J.H., Donahue N.M., Jimenez J.L., Kessler S.H., Canagaratna M., Wilson K.R., et al. Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric organic aerosol. Nature Chem 2011, (3):133-139. 10.1038/nchem.948.
46. Agrawal H., Malloy Q.G.J., Welch W.A., Wayne Miller J., Cocker D.R. In-use gaseous and particulate matter emissions from a modern ocean going container vessel. Atmos Environ 2008, 42(21):5504-5510. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.053.
47. Petzold A., Lauer P., Fritsche U., Hasselbach J., Lichtenstern M., Schlager H., et al. Operation of marine diesel engines on biogenic fuels: modification of emissions and resulting climate effects. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45(24):10394-10400.
48. Murphy S., Agrawal H., Sorooshian A., Padro L.T., Gates H., Hersey S., et al. Comprehensive simultaneous shipboard and airborne characterization of exhaust from a modern container ship at sea. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43(13):4626-4640.
49. Mohr C., Huffman J.A., Cubison M.J., Aiken A.C., Docherty K.S., Kimmel J.R., et al. Characterization of primary organic aerosol emissions from meat cooking, trash burning, and motor vehicles with high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry and comparison with ambient and chamber observations. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43(7):2443-2449. 10.1021/es8011518.
50. Sippula O., Koponen T., Jokiniemi J. Behavior of alkali metal aerosol in a high-temperature porous tube sampling probe. Aerosol Sci Technol 2012, 2012(46):1151-1162. 10.1080/02786826.2012.700741.
51. Sippula O., Hokkinen J., Puustinen H., Yli-Pirilae P., Jokiniemi J. Particle emissions from small wood-fired district heating units. Energy Fuels 2009, 2009(23):2974-2982. 10.1021/ef900098v.
52. Pika (ToF_AMS High Resolution Analysis Software); Donna Sueper from Aerodyne Research Inc.: Billerica, MA; available online at [accessed February 2011]. http://cires.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/wiki/index.php/ToFAMS_Analysis_Software#Pika_.28ToF_AMS_High_Resolution_Analysis_software.29.
53. Allan J.D., Delia A.E., Coe H., Bower K.N., Alfarra M.R., Jimenez J.L., et al. A generalised method for the extraction of chemically resolved mass spectra from Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer data. J Aerosol Sci 2004, 35(7):909-922.