Use of a formal consensus development technique to produce recommendations for improving the effectiveness of adult mental health multidisciplinary team meetings

BMC Psychiatry

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Raine, Rosalind ^a   Nic a' Bháird, Caoimhe ^a   Xanthopoulou, Penny ^a   Wallace, Isla ^a   Ardron, David ^b   Harris, Miriam ^c   Barber, Julie ^a   Prentice, Archie ^d   Gibbs, Simon ^e,f   King, Michael ^a   Blazeby, Jane M ^g   Michie, Susan ^a   Lanceley, Anne ^a   Clarke, Alex ^h   Livingston, Gill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^d Royal College of Pathologists   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL HEART AND LUNG INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^f HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^h ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adult mental health; Chronic diseases; Consensus development method; Multidisciplinary team; Recommendations

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT PLANNING; ADULT; CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MENTAL HEALTH; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ADULT; CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; CONSENSUS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; HEALTH PLANNING GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84934767928     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471244X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0534-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. National Cancer Action Team. National Cancer Peer Review Programme Manual for Cancer Services: Haemato-oncology Cancer Measures. London: National Cancer Action Team; 2013.
2. Department of Health. Improving Chronic Disease Management. 2004.
3. Department of Health. Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide: Community Mental Health Teams. London: Department of Health; 2001.
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Management of stable angina [NICE clinical guideline 126]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012.
5. Huxley P, Evans S, Baker C, White J, Philpin S, Onyett S, Gould N. Integration of social care staff within community mental health teams. Final Report. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme: Southampton; 2011.
6. Taylor C, Atkins L, Richardson A, Tarrant R, Ramirez A. Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):1-10.
7. National Peer Review Programme. National Peer Review Report: Cancer Services 2012/2013: An overview of the findings from the 2012/2013 National Peer Review of Cancer Services in England. London: NHS Improving Quality; 2013.
8. Raine R, Wallace I, Nic a Bháird C, Xanthopoulou P, Barber J, Lanceley A, Clarke C, Livingston G, Prentice A, Ardron D, et al. Improving the effectiveness of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a prospective observational study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2014, 2(37).
9. Raine R, Xanthopoulou P, Wallace I, Nic a' Bháird C, Lanceley A, Clarke A, Livingston G, Prentice A, Ardron D, Harris M, et al. Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Quality & Safety 2014.
10. National Cancer Action Team. National Cancer Peer Review Programme Manual for Cancer Services: Skin Measures. London: National Cancer Action Team; 2013.
11. National Cancer Action Team. National Cancer Peer Review Programme Manual for Cancer Services: Gynaecology Measures. London: National Cancer Action Team; 2013.
12. Department of Health. New Horizons: A Shared Vision for Mental Health. London: Department of Health; 2009.
13. Department of Health. Dementia Commissioning Pack: Service specification for dementia: memory service for early diagnosis and intervention. London: Department of Health; 2011.
14. Department of Health. Closing the Gap: Priorities for Essential Change in Mental Health. London: Department of Health; 2014.
15. Care Quality Commission. A fresh start for the regulation and inspection of mental health services. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Care Quality Commission; 2013.
16. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311(7001):376-80.
17. Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKee C, Sanderson C, Askham J, Marteau T. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i.
18. Campbell S, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326(7393):816-9.
19. Bisson JI, Tavakoly B, Witteveen AB, Ajdukovic D, Jehel L, Johansen VJ, Nordanger D, Garcia FO, Punamaki R-L, Schnyder U, et al. TENTS guidelines: development of post-disaster psychosocial care guidelines through a Delphi process. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(1):69-74.
20. Crawford MJ, Price K, Rutter D, Moran P, Tyrer P, Bateman A, Fonagy P, Gibson S, Weaver T. Dedicated community-based services for adults with personality disorder: Delphi study. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193(4):342-3.
21. Hutchings A, Raine R. A systematic review of factors affecting the judgments produced by formal consensus development methods in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11(3):172-179H.
22. Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J, Marteau T. Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999;4(4):236-48.
23. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, Burnand B, LaCalle JR. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2001.
24. Department of Health. Choosing Health: supporting the physical needs of people with severe mental illness - commissioning framework. London: Department of Health; 2006.
25. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Memory Services National Accreditation Programme: standards for memory services. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2012.
26. Department of Health. Living well with dementia: a national dementia strategy. London: Department of Health; 2009.
27. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. A NICE-SCIE Guideline on supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care. Guideline no 42. London: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health; 2007.
28. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Dementia: Supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care. NICE Clinical Guideline 42. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
29. The Royal College of Radiologists. Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meetings - Standards for Clinical Radiologists. London: Royal College of Radiologists; 2005.
30. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guidance on Cancer Services: Improving Outcomes in Haematological Cancers: The Manual. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2003.
31. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Intercollegiate Cancer Committee: Educational Initiatives to Improve the Effectiveness of Cancer Multidisciplinary Teams. London: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges; 2009.
32. National Cancer Action Team. The Characteristics of an Effective Multidisciplinary Team. London: NHS National Cancer Action Team; 2010.
33. NHS Improvement. A guide for review and improvement of hospital based heart failure services. NHS Improvement: Leicester; 2011.
34. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Chronic heart failure: Management of chronic heart failure in adults in primary and secondary care. NICE Clinical Guideline no 108, vol. GC108. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2010.
35. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Services for people with chronic heart failure. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2011.
36. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(9):979-83.
37. Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. An experimental study of determinants of the extent of disagreement within clinical guideline development groups. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(4):240-5.
38. Field KM, Rosenthal MA, Dimou J, Fleet M, Gibbs P, Drummond K. Communication in and clinician satisfaction with multidisciplinary team meetings in neuro-oncology. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(9):1130-5.
39. Fay D, Borrill C, Amir Z, Haward R, West MA. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: A multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2006;79(4):553-67.
40. West M, Alimo-Metcalfe B, Dawson J, El Ansari W, Glasby J, Hardy G, Hartley G, Lyubovnikova J, Middleton H, Naylor P. Effectiveness of Multi-Professional Team Working (MPTW) in Mental Health Care. NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation Programme: Final Report; 2011.
41. Blazeby J, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, English R, Donovan J. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(3):457-60.
42. English R, Metcalfe C, Day J, Rayter Z, Blazeby J. A Prospective Analysis of Implementation of Multi-Disciplinary Team Decisions in Breast Cancer. Breast J. 2012;18(5):459-63.
43. Kidger J, Murdoch J, Donovan J, Blazeby J. Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study. BJOG. 2009;116(4):511-7.
44. Care Quality Commission. National Summary of the Results for the 2014 Community Mental Health Survey. Newcastle upon Tyne: Care Quality Commission; 2014.
45. Raine R, Sanderson C, Hutchings A, Carter S, Larkin K, Black N. An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. Lancet. 2004;364(9432):429-37.
46. Loblaw DA, Prestrud AA, Somerfield MR, Oliver TK, Brouwers MC, Nam RK, Lyman GH, Basch E. American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Formal Systematic Review-Based Consensus Methodology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(25):3136-40.
47. Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ. 2005;331(7517):631-3.