Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: A mixed-methods study

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 867-876

  Raine, Rosalind ^a   Xanthopoulou, Penny ^a   Wallace, Isla ^a   A'Bháird, Caoimhe Nic ^a   Lanceley, Anne ^a   Clarke, Alex ^b   Livingston, Gill ^a   Prentice, Archie ^c   Ardron, Dave ^d   Harris, Miriam ^e   King, Michael ^a   Michie, Susan ^a   Blazeby, Jane M ^f   Austin Parsons, Natalie ^g   Gibbs, Simon ^h   Barber, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Royal College of Pathologists   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^g ROYAL COLLEGE OF PSYCHIATRISTS   (United Kingdom)

^h HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMENTIA; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEART FAILURE; HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM; NON PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SKIN CANCER; TEAMWORK; TREATMENT PLANNING; CHRONIC DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; ENGLAND; INTERVIEW; LEADERSHIP; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING;

ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LEADERSHIP; MALE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84907145925     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002818     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. National Cancer Action Team. National cancer peer review programme manual for cancer services: haemato-oncology cancer measures. London: National Cancer Action Team, 2013.
2. Department of Health. Mental health policy implementation guide. London: Department of Health, 2001.
3. Walker D, Kemp E. A guide for review and improvement of hospital based heart failure services. London: NHS Improvement, 2011.
4. Harrison JD, Choy ET, Spillane A, et al. Australian breast cancer specialists' involvement in multidisciplinary treatment planning meetings. Breast 2008;17:335-40.
5. Wagner EH. Effective teamwork and quality of care. Med Care 2004;42:1037-9.
6. Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, et al. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2116-25.
7. Bosch M, Faber MJ, Cruijsberg J, et al. Effectiveness of patient care teams and the role of clinical expertise and coordination: a literature review. Med Care Res Rev 2009;66(6 Suppl):5S-35S.
8. National Peer Review Programme. National peer review report: cancer services 2012/2013: an overview of the findings from the 2012/2013 National Peer Review of Cancer Services in England. London: NHS Improving Quality, 2013.
9. Fay D, Borrill C, Amir Z, et al. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: a multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. J Occup Organ Psychol 2006;79:553-67.
10. Anderson NR, West MA. Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. J Organ Behav 1998;19:235-58.
11. Gonzalez-Roma V, Gamero N. Does positive team mood mediate the relationship between team climate and team performance? Psicothema 2012;24:94-9.
12. Goh T, Eccles M, Steen N. Factors predicting team climate, and its relationship with quality of care in general practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:1-11.
13. Department of Health. Mental health policy implementation guide: community mental health teams. London: Department of Health, 2002.
14. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Chronic heart failure: management of chronic heart failure in adults in primary and secondary care. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2010.
15. Dixon A, Le Grand J, Henderson J, et al. Is the British National health service equitable? The evidence on socioeconomic differences in utilization. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007;12:104-9.
16. Department of Health. The NHS constitution for England. London: Department of Health, 2013.
17. Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, et al. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol 2006;17:457-60.
18. Mickan SM. Evaluating the effectiveness of health care teams. Aust Health Rev 2005;29:211-7.
19. Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt IS. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision-making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? J Health Serv Res Policy 1998;3:100-7.
20. Lilford RJ, Brown CA, Nicholl J. Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practice. BMJ 2007;335:648-50.
21. Kivimaki M, Elovainio M. A short version of the team climate inventory: development and psychometric properties. J Occup Organ Psychol 1999;72:241-6.
22. Biemann T, Kearney E. Size does matter: how varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organ Res Methods 2010;13:582-99.
23. Harrison DA, Klein KJ. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 2007;32:1199-228.
24. Department for Communities and Local Government. The English indices of deprivation 2010. London: Department for Communities and Local Government, 2011.
25. Harrell FE. Regression modelling strategies. Nashville: Springer, 2001.
26. Gilligan D, Goodrum L, Magee L, et al. Do decisions made at lung cancer multi-disciplinary team meetings get carried out. Lung Cancer 2005;49(Suppl 2(0)):S24.
27. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, et al. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1373-9.
28. Gulliford MC, Adams G, Ukoumunne OC, et al. Intraclass correlation coefficient and outcome prevalence are associated in clustered binary data. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:246-51.
29. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
30. Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, et al. Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 1999;9:26-44.
31. Nembhard IM, Edmondson AC. Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. J Organ Behav 2006;27:941-66.
32. Doyle J. Barriers and facilitators of multidisciplinary team working: a review. Paediatr Nurs 2008;20:26-9.
33. Bezrukova K, Jehn K, Zanutto E, et al. Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance. Organ Sci 2009;20:35-50.
34. Van Knippenberg D, Dawson JF, West MA, et al. Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Hum Relations 2011;64:307-36.
35. Kearney E, Gebert D. Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. J Appl Psychol 2009;94:77-89.
36. Lyratzopoulos G, Barbiere J, Gajperia C, et al. Trends and variation in the management of oesophagogastric cancer patients: a population-based survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:231.
37. Rachet B, Ellis L, Maringe C, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England after the NHS Cancer Plan. Br J Cancer 2010;103:446-53.
38. Cooper C, Blanchard M, Selwood A, et al. Antidementia drugs: prescription by level of cognitive impairment or by socio-economic group?. Aging Ment Health 2010;14:85-9.
39. Bajekal M, Scholes S, Love H, et al. Analysing recent socioeconomic trends in coronary heart disease mortality in England, 2000-2007: a population modelling study. PLoS Med 2012;9:e1001237.