A hybrid physical and maximum-entropy landslide susceptibility model

Entropy

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 4271-4292

  Davis, Jerry ^a   Blesius, Leonhard ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cohesion; Hybrid model; Landslide susceptibility; Maximum entropy model; Physical model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934311950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10994300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/e17064271     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Varnes, D.J. Slope movement types and processes. In Landslides: Analysis and Control; Schuster, R.L., Krizek, R.J., Eds.; Volume Special Report 176; National Academy of Science Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 1978; pp. 11-33.
2. Schumm, S.A. Geomorphic thresholds: The concept and its applications. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 1979, 4, 485-515.
3. Uchida, T.; Kosugi, K.; Mizuyama, T. Effects of pipeflow on hydrological process and its relation to landslide: A review of pipeflow studies in forested headwater catchments. Hydrol. Process. 2001, 15, 2151-2174.
4. Montgomery, D.R. Road surface drainage, channel initiation, and slope instability. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30, 1925-1932.
5. Iverson, R.M.; George, D.L.; Allstadt, K.; Reid, M.E.; Collins, B.D.; Vallance, J.W.; Schilling, S.P.; Godt, J.W.; Cannon, C.M.; Magirl, C.S.; et al. Landslide mobility and hazards: Implications of the 2014 Oso disaster. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2015, 412, 197-208.
6. Leshchinsky, B.A.; Olsen, M.J.; Tanyu, B.F. Contour Connection Method for automated identification and classification of landslide deposits. Comput. Geosci. 2015, 74, 27-38.
7. Butt, M.; Umar, M.; Qamar, R. Landslide dam and subsequent dam-break flood estimation using HEC-RAS model in Northern Pakistan. Nat. Hazards 2013, 65, 241-254.
8. Wills, C.J.; McCrink, T.P. Comparing landslide inventories: The map depends on the method. Environ. Eng. Geosci. 2002, VIII, 279-293.
9. Van Westen, C.J.; Castellanos, E.; Kuriakose, S.L. Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview. Eng. Geol. 2008, 102, 112-131.
10. Martha, T.R.; Kerle, N.; Jetten, V.; van Westen, C.J.; Kumar, K.V. Characterising spectral, spatial and morphometric properties of landslides for semi-automatic detection using object-oriented methods. Geomorphology 2010, 116, 24-36.
11. Parker, O.; Blesius, L. Object-Based Segmentation of Multi-Temporal Quickbird Imagery for Landslide Detection. In Proceedings of XII International Symposium on Environmental Geotechnology, Energy and Global Sustainable Development, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 27-29 June 2012; Menezes, G.B., Moo-Young, H.K., Khachikian, C., de Brito Galvao, T.C., Eds.; Environmental Geotechnology: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2012; pp. 291-299.
12. Cascini, L. Applicability of landslide susceptibility and hazard zoning at different scales. Eng. Geol. 2008, 102, 164-177.
13. Blesius, L.; Weirich, F. Shallow Landslide susceptibility mapping using stereo air photos and thematic maps. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 37, 105-118.
14. Kavzoglu, T.; Sahin, E.K.; Colkesen, I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis, support vector machines and logistic regression. Landslides 2014, 11, 425-439.
15. Dhakal, A.; Amada, T.; Aniya, M. Landslide hazard mapping and the application of GIS in the Kulekhani Watershed, Nepal. Mt. Res. Dev. 1999, 19, 3-16.
16. Tosi, M. Root tensile strength relationships and their slope stability implications of three shrub species in the Northern Apennines (Italy). Geomorphology 2007, 87, 268-283.
17. Rice, R.M.; Foggin, G.T. Effect of high intensity storms on soil slippage on mountainous watersheds in southern California. Water Resour. Res. 1971, 7, 1485-1496.
18. Blesius, L.; Weirich, F. The use of high-resolution satellite imagery for deriving geotechnical parameters applied to landslide susceptibility. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Hannover Workshop 2009 on High-resolution Earth Imaging for Geospatial Information, Hannover, Germany, 2-5 June 2009; Heipke, C., Jacobsen, K., Müller, S., Sörgel, U., Eds.; International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Hannover, Germany, 2009.
19. Band, L.E.; Hwang, T.; Hales, T.C.; Vose, J.; Ford, C. Ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: Mapping and modeling ecohydrological controls of landslides. Geomorphology 2012, 137, 159-167.
20. Cervi, F.; Berti, M.; Borgatti, L.; Ronchetti, F.; Manenti, F.; Corsini, A. Comparing predictive capability of statistical and deterministic methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: A case study in the northern Apennines (Reggio Emilia Province, Italy). Landslides 2010, 7, 433-444.
21. Althuwaynee, O.F.; Pradhan, B.; Park, H.-J.; Lee, J.H. A novel ensemble decision tree-based CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) and multivariate logistic regression models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Landslides 2014, 11, 1063-1078.
22. Tien Bui, D.; Tuan, T.A.; Klempe, H.; Pradhan, B.; Revhaug, I. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: A comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides 2015, doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6.
23. Tien Bui, D.; Pradhan, B.; Lofman, O.; Revhaug, I.; Dick, O.B. Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. Catena 2012, 96, 28-40.
24. Haigh, M.J. Dynamic systems approaches in landslide hazard risk. Z. Fuer Geomorphol. 1988, 67, 79-91.
25. Phillips, S.; Anderson, R.; Schapire, R. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231-259.
26. Convertino, M.; Troccoli, A.; Catani, F. Detecting fingerprints of landslide drivers: A MaxEnt model. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 2013, 118, 1367-1386.
27. Brabb, E.E.; Pampeyan, E.H.; Bonilla, M.G. Landslide susceptibility in San Mateo County California scale 1:62500. In Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-360; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1972.
28. Kashiwagi, J.H.; Hokholt, L.A. Soil Survey of San Mateo County, Eastern part, and San Francisco County, California; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1991.
29. Soil Survey Staff. Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd ed.; US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; Volume Agriculture Handbook #436, p. 869.
30. Pampeyan, E.H. Geologic Map of the Montara Mountain and San Mateo 7-1/2' Quadrangles, San Mateo County, California, Scale 1:24,000; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1994.
31. Brabb, E.E.; Pampeyen, E.H. Preliminary map of landslide deposits in San Mateo County, California, scale 1:62,500. In Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-344; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1972.
32. Sims, S. Hillslope sediment source assessment of San Pedro Creek Watershed, California. Master's Thesis, The San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.
33. United States Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District. San Pedro Creek Section 205 Flood Control Study. Engineers, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco, 1998.
34. Pack, R.; Tarboton, D.; Goodwin, C.; Prasad, A. A Stability Index Approach to Terrain Stability Hazard Mapping 2005, User's Manual; CEE Faculty Publications: Logan, UT, USA, 2005. Avaliable online: http://hydrology.usu.edu/sinmap2/(accessed on 8 May 2013).
35. Dyke, J.; Kleidon, A. The maximum entropy production principle: Its theoretical foundations and applications to the earth system. Entropy 2010, 12, 613-630.
36. Phillips, J.D. Divergence, convergence, and self-organization in landscapes. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1999, 89, 466-488.
37. Elith, J.; Phillips, S.; Hastie, T.; Dudík, M.; Chee, Y.; Yates, C. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 2011, 17, 43-57.
38. Ruddell, B.L.; Brunsell, N.A.; Stoy, P. Applying information theory in the geosciences to quantify process uncertainty, feedback, scale. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2013, 94, 56.
39. Felicísimo, Á.; Cuartero, A.; Remondo, J.; Quirós, E. Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: A comparative study. Landslides 2013, 10, 175-189.
40. Phillips, S.; Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 2008, 31, 161-175.
41. Ghestem, M.; Sidle, R.; Stokes, A. The influence of plant root systems on subsurface flow: Implications for slope stability. BioScience 2011, 61, 869-879.
42. Reneau, S.L.; Dietrich, W.E.; Donahue, D.J.; Jull, A.J.T.; Rubin, M. Late Quaternary history of colluvial deposition and erosion in hollows, central California Coast Ranges. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1990, 102, 969-982.
43. Rib, H.T.; Liang, T. Landslides: Analysis and control. In Recognition and Identification; Schuster, R.L., Krizek, R.J., Eds.; Volume Special Report 176; National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 1978;, pp. 34-80.
44. Collins, L.; Amato, P.; Morton, D. San Pedro Creek geomorphic analysis. In San Pedro Creek Watershed Assessment and Enhancement Plan; San Pedro Creek Watershed Coalition: Pacifica, CA, USA, 2001; pp. 631-646.
45. Howard, T.R.; Baldwin, J.E.; Donley, H.F. Landslides in Pacifica California caused by the storm. In Landslides Floods and Marine Effects of the Storm of January3-5, 1982 in the San Francisco Bay Region California; Volume US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434; US Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1988; pp. 3-5.
46. Cannon, S.H.; Ellen, S.D. Rainfall that resulted in abundant debris-flow activity during the storm. In Landslides, Floods, and Marine Effects of the Storm of January 3-5, 1982 in the San Francisco Bay Region, California; Volume US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1988; pp. 3-5.
47. Davis, J.D.; Sims, S.M. Physical and maximum entropy models applied to inventories of hillslope sediment sources. J. Soils Sediments 2013, 13, 1784-1801.
48. Wieslander, A.E. A vegetation type map of California. Madroño 1935, 3, 140-144.
49. Davis, J.D.; Matuk, V.; Wilkinson, N.L.; Chan, C. San Pedro Creek Watershed Assessment and Enhancement Plan; San Pedro Creek Watershed Coalition: Pacifica, CA, USA, 2002.
50. Davis, J.D.; Davis, A.W.; Harvey, B.J. Pedro Point Headlands 1941 to 2010: A Preliminary Study Using Historical Remote Sensing and Dendrochronology; Pacifica Land Trust: Pacifica, CA, USA, 2010.
51. Wieczorek, G.F.; Harp, E.L.; Mark, R.K.; Bhattacharyya, A.K. Debris flows and other landslides in San Contra Costa, Alameda, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Lake, and Yolo Counties, and other factors influencing debris-flow distribution. In Landslides, Floods, and Marine Effects of the Storm of January 3-5, 1982 in the San Francisco Bay Region, California; Volume US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 1988; pp. 3-5.